Page 1 of 1

Tyson interview on ITV.

Posted: 05 Dec 2005, 16:03
by stujones
What did eveyone make of this? I thought it was quite interesting. The man knows his boxing and seemed to be quite realistic about his own downfall and why hasn't been fighting well of late but when he discussed whether this is due to his advancing years he said of his skills now "I know I'm still great".

Of course Barry and Duke were spot on in their hopes that he doesn't return, but just a question - how much of an improvement do you think there would be if he did (and I know he won't so it is hypothetical) dedicated himself for 6 months as he said what he needed to do should he return.

He seemed pretty sure that it his lack of desire that has cost him most and not age. What do you think?

Posted: 05 Dec 2005, 16:14
by Syntax Error
I missed this, when was it on?

Posted: 05 Dec 2005, 16:17
by stujones
Syntax Error wrote:I missed this, when was it on?
Nelson vs Cantatore bill

Posted: 05 Dec 2005, 16:19
by Syntax Error
stujones wrote:
Syntax Error wrote:I missed this, when was it on?
Nelson vs Cantatore bill
Thanks.

That's why I missed it; I've boycotted all Nelson fights, since his abysmal performance in the Warring fight in 1992! I thought he would have learnt from the DeLeon farce in 1990, but alas, no, he was just as bad against Warring!!!! :TU:

Posted: 05 Dec 2005, 16:38
by Exile
Any links?

Re: Tyson interview on ITV.

Posted: 05 Dec 2005, 22:32
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
stujones wrote:What did eveyone make of this? I thought it was quite interesting. The man knows his boxing and seemed to be quite realistic about his own downfall and why hasn't been fighting well of late but when he discussed whether this is due to his advancing years he said of his skills now "I know I'm still great".

Of course Barry and Duke were spot on in their hopes that he doesn't return, but just a question - how much of an improvement do you think there would be if he did (and I know he won't so it is hypothetical) dedicated himself for 6 months as he said what he needed to do should he return.

He seemed pretty sure that it his lack of desire that has cost him most and not age. What do you think?
He has no hunger, less speed, less power and most importantly hasn't the energy/stamina to have the high volume high action fighting style which is the only way he knows how to fight.

Against Holy he was a 5round fighter (although still fought well but not well enough after R5), against Lewis/Williams he was a 1round fighter, against McBride he tried to change his style to fight at a slower pace for 12rounds - it didnt work.

Hes totally shot - he still has the strength, some speed all the technique - but he can't produce the frantic pace which made him a legend

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 05:20
by jamesmcdonnell
Tyson doesn't even have the technique any more, he stopped using Cus D'amato's system, relatively early in his career, and became a more straight forward slugger with less defence. His handspeed is still pretty impressive for his age, but without the output he's just not that good.

Re: Tyson interview on ITV.

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 07:24
by stujones
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
stujones wrote:What did eveyone make of this? I thought it was quite interesting. The man knows his boxing and seemed to be quite realistic about his own downfall and why hasn't been fighting well of late but when he discussed whether this is due to his advancing years he said of his skills now "I know I'm still great".

Of course Barry and Duke were spot on in their hopes that he doesn't return, but just a question - how much of an improvement do you think there would be if he did (and I know he won't so it is hypothetical) dedicated himself for 6 months as he said what he needed to do should he return.

He seemed pretty sure that it his lack of desire that has cost him most and not age. What do you think?
He has no hunger, less speed, less power and most importantly hasn't the energy/stamina to have the high volume high action fighting style which is the only way he knows how to fight.

Against Holy he was a 5round fighter (although still fought well but not well enough after R5), against Lewis/Williams he was a 1round fighter, against McBride he tried to change his style to fight at a slower pace for 12rounds - it didnt work.

Hes totally shot - he still has the strength, some speed all the technique - but he can't produce the frantic pace which made him a legend
Is this due to age or the way he has been training, or a combination of both?

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 07:27
by jamesmcdonnell
Both, Tyson has been abusing himself for a long long time now, he's not trained hard for fights for over a decade and he's almost 40, so there's no surprise.

Plus, there is zero mystique about the man, he's been battered to defeat by Williams and now McBride, the aura of fear has gone, and that was always one of his most potent weapons.

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 09:29
by Goz
I think Tyson can come back and unify the titles if only he will dedicate himself. C'mon Mike I know you can do it.

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 10:14
by jamesmcdonnell
Is that a joke? Please tell me you are joking....

He can't even beat Kevin McBride for fucks sake.

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 10:26
by Goz
Mike just ran out of steam against Mcbride, for the early rounds he looked like the old Mike.

Against Danny Williams he was injured.

Against Lennox Lewis he kept smashing his face against Lewis's fists, otherwise he would surely have won the unified titles there and then in 2002.

In the division is so weak, if Tyson would just take back Rooney, be 21 years old again and get some heart, fitness and desire he could be the best again!

Of course I was phucking joking, I just couldn't believe the thread I was reading....

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 10:28
by J
and the post of the year award goes to...GOz :lol: :TU:

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 10:31
by steve689
Exile wrote:Any links?
Try http://www.allegedly.tv, i don't think Johnny Nelson has his own website.

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 11:21
by DavidPayne
According to the back of Brendan's t-shirt Friday he does have a website.

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 11:22
by DavidPayne
Could we assume the Johnny Nelson website doesn't get hit a lot?

Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 19:18
by BunglesFingers
I have to say that I would rather look at Jonny's website than watch his fights these days.

Does a great job as a pundit :TU:

As for Tyson, no he should never go back and he has said the same old bollocks many times before.