Page 1 of 1
BBC's UK P4P top ten - dearie me
Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 14:54
by dondada
1 Hatton
2 Calzaghe
3 Scott Harrison
4 Eastman
5 Woods
6 Witter
7 Nelson
8 Nicky Cook
9 Froch
10 Jennings...
...and apparently 'Just missed out' - Enzo Macc and David Haye.
I normally don't have much truck with these things but have to say - WTF!
Eastman at number FOUR despite being an utterly lazy bastard the last two times out and no place for British, Commonwealth and European champion Michael Hunter? Utter rubbish.
Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 16:06
by Neri
All the BBC's top 10 have achieved alot more than haye & Enzo id say and even though Haye looks a better pound for pound fighter than say Eastman, Eastman has fought in a much higher class of opposition. I wouldnt argue with the content but maybe the positioning.
Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 18:47
by ManonFire
Would of thought Alex Arthur might of made that list
Re: BBC's UK P4P top ten - dearie me
Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 18:51
by jamesmcdonnell
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:1 Hatton
2 Calzaghe
3 Scott Harrison
4 Eastman
5 Woods
6 Witter
7 Nelson
8 Nicky Cook
9 Froch
10 Jennings...
...and apparently 'Just missed out' - Enzo Macc and David Haye.
I normally don't have much truck with these things but have to say - WTF!
Eastman at number FOUR despite being an utterly lazy bastard the last two times out and no place for British, Commonwealth and European champion Michael Hunter? Utter rubbish.
Overall not a bad list, but what Eastman is doing there is beyond me, Clinton Woods has easily beaten better opposition, and acquitted himself far better in his losing effort to Glen Johnson. Eastman showboated and fannied about in two losing efforts to Joppy and Hopkins, then snoozes his way to a loss over Abraham, who he had the beating of.
Not so sure about Hunter, only because not seen enough of him, but his record alone should be enough I guess.
Re: BBC's UK P4P top ten - dearie me
Posted: 06 Dec 2005, 18:51
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:1 Hatton
2 Calzaghe
3 Scott Harrison
4 Eastman
5 Woods
6 Witter
7 Nelson
8 Nicky Cook
9 Froch
10 Jennings...
...and apparently 'Just missed out' - Enzo Macc and David Haye.
I normally don't have much truck with these things but have to say - WTF!
Eastman at number FOUR despite being an utterly lazy bastard the last two times out and no place for British, Commonwealth and European champion Michael Hunter? Utter rubbish.
Woods should be higher upto no2. Whats Eastman done? Should be below all the top 7. Calazage should be back upto 2 maybe 1 if he beats Lacy.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 03:50
by dondada
Neri1983 wrote:All the BBC's top 10 have achieved alot more than haye & Enzo id say and even though Haye looks a better pound for pound fighter than say Eastman, Eastman has fought in a much higher class of opposition. I wouldnt argue with the content but maybe the positioning.
Have you heard of Michael Hunter?
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 05:59
by Lenny
How about...
1. Hatton
2. Calzaghe
3. Woods
4. Nelson
5. Witter
6. Hunter
7. Cook
8. Arthur
9. Eastman
10. Pickering
??
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 06:04
by jamesmcdonnell
No Scott Harrison mate?

Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 06:11
by Lenny
Nope he's rubbish...
bollocks
Stick him in at 4 and bump the rest down, am considering...nope keep Pickering at 10 and get rid of Eastman.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 06:18
by computerrank
BoxRec's:
1. Hatton
2. Harrison
3. Eastman
4. Arthur
5. Calzaghe
6. Witter
7. D.Willimams
8. Reid
9. Woods
10. Magee
against BBC's:
1 Hatton
2 Calzaghe
3 Scott Harrison
4 Eastman
5 Woods
6 Witter
7 Nelson
8 Nicky Cook
9 Froch
10 Jennings...
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 06:31
by jamesmcdonnell
shows why electronic rankings are so unreliable, look at where Eastman is in boxrec's!
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 06:51
by Lenny
Reid ahead of Woods?? How does that work?
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 06:56
by jamesmcdonnell
It's based on how many points they all have, some divisions seem to have more points for their highest rated than others.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 07:00
by DavidPayne
No Nelson on boxrec's....groan.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 10:11
by computerrank
jamesmcdonnell wrote:It's based on how many points they all have, some divisions seem to have more points for their highest rated than others.
Yes, some divisions are more competitive.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 15:15
by Neri
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Neri1983 wrote:All the BBC's top 10 have achieved alot more than haye & Enzo id say and even though Haye looks a better pound for pound fighter than say Eastman, Eastman has fought in a much higher class of opposition. I wouldnt argue with the content but maybe the positioning.
Have you heard of Michael Hunter?
Yes i have actually, on achievement he could just squeeze in but thats arguable. But its my P4P i'm thinking of and he doesnt make the top 10 for me.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 15:27
by dondada
Neri1983 wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Neri1983 wrote:All the BBC's top 10 have achieved alot more than haye & Enzo id say and even though Haye looks a better pound for pound fighter than say Eastman, Eastman has fought in a much higher class of opposition. I wouldnt argue with the content but maybe the positioning.
Have you heard of Michael Hunter?
Yes i have actually, on achievement he could just squeeze in but thats arguable. But its my P4P i'm thinking of and he doesnt make the top 10 for me.
Explain to me how, based on current form and achievements, Eastman gets in your top ten and Hunter doesn't. And don't give me this better class of opposition bollocks. Buckley would be in on that criteria.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 15:39
by dondada
Criteria for these things are important obviously. I go on achievement over potential. And I actually think you can go DOWN in the list whilst you are winning. Witter would have been higher for me if he hadn't been terrible recently and has been overtaken by others who have been more impressive. For what it's worth, mine:
1 Hatton
2 Calzaghe
3 Nelson
4 Woods
5 Scott Harrison
6 Arthur
7 Nicky Cook
8 Hunter
9 Witter
10 Jennings
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 15:47
by stujones
Wouldn't have Jennings in the top ten yet. A fair few I would have instead of him.
For now I would still have Thompson ahead of him.
Also would have guys like Moore, Kelly (world class), Pickering, Magee (Eamomn), Reid, Earl, Dann and Alexander ahead of him.
Jennings has only just won the British title and has hardly established as a good champion yet.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 16:08
by dondada
stujones wrote:Wouldn't have Jennings in the top ten yet. A fair few I would have instead of him.
For now I would still have Thompson ahead of him.
Also would have guys like Moore, Kelly (world class), Pickering, Magee (Eamomn), Reid, Earl, Dann and Alexander ahead of him.
Jennings has only just won the British title and has hardly established as a good champion yet.
Thompson was very fortunate to win his last fight and despite everyone saying "we've all written him off before" I do believe he's finished.
I was debating whether or not to go for Moore, Jennings, Kelly, Pickering or maybe even Dann for that tenth one. But I could only squeeze one in. As a compiler of rankings, you should know the difficulties that arise.
Speaking of which, stick yours up on here.
I suppose Jennings is the one floater I've picked on potential. Magee needs to re-establish himself and did himself no favours by pulling out of this weekend's bill. Reid is on the way down as is Alexander.
Earl? He got his lugs boxed off by a relative novice. You are extraordinarily generous with that call.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 16:45
by Neri
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Neri1983 wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Have you heard of Michael Hunter?
Yes i have actually, on achievement he could just squeeze in but thats arguable. But its my P4P i'm thinking of and he doesnt make the top 10 for me.
Explain to me how, based on current form and achievements, Eastman gets in your top ten and Hunter doesn't. And don't give me this better class of opposition bollocks. Buckley would be in on that criteria.
Class of opposition has to be some sort of factor. Ok Eastman has had a bad run lately and has had a lot of criticism for being lazy, but going 12 rounds with THE middleweight champion of the world & at the time No. 1 pound for pound in the world plus a highly tipped up and comer in Abraham who can prove himself even more against Ikeke soon isn't bad even in losing, these are top notch opponents.
Previous to these tricky fights he did defend his British title against current champ Dann and defend his European title a few times.
Don't get me wrong Hunter is a good fighter and would be on the verge of top 10 British P4P, but winning and defending the British super bantam title against not exactly formidable opponents and coming good in a close fight with Pickering would'nt place him above Eastman for me. Hunter being excited and Eastman not doesn't do it for me.
But all our P4P are going to differ. It's subjective and difficult to define, and just my opinion.
Posted: 07 Dec 2005, 19:36
by stujones
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:stujones wrote:Wouldn't have Jennings in the top ten yet. A fair few I would have instead of him.
For now I would still have Thompson ahead of him.
Also would have guys like Moore, Kelly (world class), Pickering, Magee (Eamomn), Reid, Earl, Dann and Alexander ahead of him.
Jennings has only just won the British title and has hardly established as a good champion yet.
Thompson was very fortunate to win his last fight and despite everyone saying "we've all written him off before" I do believe he's finished.
I was debating whether or not to go for Moore, Jennings, Kelly, Pickering or maybe even Dann for that tenth one. But I could only squeeze one in. As a compiler of rankings, you should know the difficulties that arise.
Speaking of which, stick yours up on here.
I suppose Jennings is the one floater I've picked on potential. Magee needs to re-establish himself and did himself no favours by pulling out of this weekend's bill. Reid is on the way down as is Alexander.
Earl? He got his lugs boxed off by a relative novice. You are extraordinarily generous with that call.
Suppose your right on Earl - forgot about that. Still a little annoyed at losing money on the Bennett outcome (which I based on the Burns performance).
It got to be Kelly in the top ten, has to be him. Beaten Booth (who beat Robinson), outclassed Napa (who almost beat Power), undefeated EBU champion. Lost to an outstanding world champion (well he was) - still "looks" world class and could be argued to be the #1 Flyweight and Bantamweight domestically and he done that through actual wins.
Incidently the rankings will be up tonight - couple of changes. Here is my latest P4P. I have shifted Thompson down, but not out of the ten.
Pound 4 Pound.
1. (1.) Ricky Hatton – Beats a legend to move to the top of the UK P4P rankings
2. (2.) Joe Calzaghe – Long time #1 slips down after a stagnant few years.
3. (3.) Clinton Woods – Excellent win over Gonzales propels him up the P4P rankings.
4. (4.) Scott Harrison – Wins the featherweight battle of Britain to close the gap on Calzaghe and Woods.
5. (5.) Johnny Nelson – Good win on his return.
6. (7.) Damean Kelly – Excellent performance vs Napa.
7. (8). Junior Witter – Moves into the top ten at the expense of Brodie who appears to have retired.
8. (6.) Carl Thompson – Looked like a faded fighter on his return. .
9. (9). Nicky Cook – A European champion in impressive form.
10. (10). Alex Arthur – Very impressive vs Sinistin to capture the EBU title.
Posted: 08 Dec 2005, 03:50
by dondada
Wouldn't object to Kelly at all. Getting better too.
Posted: 08 Dec 2005, 09:38
by DK2112
How the hell can they put Nelson below Eastman and Witter? Pathetic
Posted: 08 Dec 2005, 13:58
by Neri
Oh yer forgot about Kelly.