Page 1 of 2
Naz in big trouble
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 09:36
by dondada
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 09:38
by jamesmcdonnell
Hmm, says a custodial sentence is a possibility, not a certainty, he can certainly afford a decent brief.
If he was guilty then I've little sympathy, driving around at breakneck speed on a resedential street is fornicating thick.
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 09:42
by dondada
jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hmm, says a custodial sentence is a possibility, not a certainty, he can certainly afford a decent brief.
If he was guilty then I've little sympathy, driving around at breakneck speed on a resedential street is fornicating thick.
I think it's a probability rather than a possibility but one has to be careful when one doesn't have one's law book to hand...
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 09:50
by jamesmcdonnell
Indeed....M'lud
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 09:51
by My T Sharp
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:jamesmcdonnell wrote:Hmm, says a custodial sentence is a possibility, not a certainty, he can certainly afford a decent brief.
If he was guilty then I've little sympathy, driving around at breakneck speed on a resedential street is fornicating thick.
I think it's a probability rather than a possibility but one has to be careful when one doesn't have one's law book to hand...
Highway code has 2yrs Max custodial and unlimited fine for dangerous driving.
Penalty table on
http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/28.htm scroll down a bit to chapter 5.
Re: Naz in big trouble
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 10:01
by KO Artist
There are reports he ran and left the guy for dead.
Could be a 2 -3 stretch coming up for Naz
Oh well, at least he will be back at Featherweight by the time he comes out.
I heard he likes Porridge.
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 10:12
by knockout
The irony is that allegdely the guy in the other car used to train with Brendan Ingle too!!!
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 12:37
by dandantheweatherman
Aren't Naz's charges pretty much the same as those that got footballer Lee Hughes banged up? I think he got 6 years.
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 12:41
by states
dandantheweatherman wrote:Aren't Naz's charges pretty much the same as those that got footballer Lee Hughes banged up? I think he got 6 years.
Didn't the fella Lee Hughes hit die though?
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 12:47
by MightyWarrior
Surely it'll just be a fine? No alchohol involved, and his hot shot lawyer will argue it was a one off error of judgement ( or whatever ) etc etc
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 12:52
by Gordon
Young girl in my work has just got herself a 3 month ban. No fine, no penalty points.
She was doing 113mph on a 40 mph limit.
Daddy got her a good lawyer,
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 13:29
by nickd
If you remember Hamed did a runner from the scene, so not just a straight up dangerous driving charge perhaps, it will be fleeing the scene of an accident also surely? By rights he should be banged up, if any of us regular Joe's did what he has done we'd be going away for a little holiday why should it be any different for him.
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 13:31
by MightyWarrior
Doesn't mention doing a runner in the charges I've seen.
Serious enough to add leaving the scene of a crime if he did you'd think..maybe that was his two "buddies", who just had charges dropped.
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 13:34
by nickd
MightyWarrior wrote:Doesn't mention doing a runner in the charges I've seen.
Serious enough to add leaving the scene of a crime if he did you'd think..maybe that was his two "buddies", who just had charges dropped.
I remember from the time of the accident, Hamed and one of his brothers I think ran from the scene. At the time there was confusion as to who was driving the car, I'm sure I read somewhere they thought Hamed might have lent the car to someone who was uninsured. Just going on memory here so may not be the case.
Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 15:08
by tonyevs
It takes exceptional charges to send a celebrity to prison...or to even get it taken seriously
Fine looks the most likely scenario...who is that celebrity lawyer who gets all the footballers off? he`d probably get it thrown out

Posted: 15 Dec 2005, 15:12
by steve689
states wrote:dandantheweatherman wrote:Aren't Naz's charges pretty much the same as those that got footballer Lee Hughes banged up? I think he got 6 years.
Didn't the fella Lee Hughes hit die though?
Yeah the old guy did die and Lee Hughes is now banged up for in Featherstone prison not far from me.
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 08:22
by hammer
yeah but the diffrences is one was high on drink and drugs,the other just not paying attenion on the road.think it will be harsh if naz is sent down ,cant see it my self but who knows with all this terroist stuff and the fact naz is a hardcore musilm they may make him pay .
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 08:27
by hammer
i have no faith in the british justice system.

Re: Naz in big trouble
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 08:38
by DavidPayne
KO Atrist wrote:
I heard he likes Porridge.
Dont tell me they get UK Gold on the inside too?
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 09:30
by MightyWarrior
Don't think he'll go inside: I hear the prison population is balooning, which I think is an outrage - why should these criminals be allowed the trip of a lifetime - something us normal folk can only dream about?
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 09:36
by My T Sharp
MightyWarrior wrote:Don't think he'll go inside: I hear the prison population is balooning, which I think is an outrage - why should these criminals be allowed the trip of a lifetime - something us normal folk can only dream about?
Surely Naz is full of enough hot air to go balooning any time he wants
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 12:31
by dandantheweatherman
Regarding Lee Hughes and Naz, I'd forgotten that Naz didn't actually kill anyone (at least I hope not).
I used to work in Manchester and a mate of mine got off speeding (110 on the M62) by paying the brief Alex Ferguson used to get him off charges when he was speeding because he needed the khazi (or something). Anyway, this brief found some technicality to get my mate off. Cost him thousands, but he reckoned it saved him money on taxi fares to work in the long run!
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 13:02
by liamlion
Hughes' long sentence rests on a few issues.
Hughes already had a previous conviction for Drink Driving and so the Judge took this into consideration, along with the fact that Hughes also went missing for a few days after the accident.
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 19:05
by hitman_hatton1
liamlion wrote:Hughes' long sentence rests on a few issues.
Hughes already had a previous conviction for Drink Driving and so the Judge took this into consideration, along with the fact that Hughes also went missing for a few days after the accident.
hasn't naz got a bit of previous on a motoring offence. unless he fled the scene, he should be ok.

Re: Naz in big trouble
Posted: 16 Dec 2005, 19:12
by ebeneezer
KO Atrist wrote:I heard he likes Porridge.
I heard that he likes Open All Hours and Last Of The Summer Wine as well.