Page 1 of 1
tv coverage
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 14:10
by Photocopier-the revenge!
i have followed chat on this and other forums for a couple of years. i have never been concerned enough to post on here but due to the current state of things i feel compelled to speak out.
are the current tv channels that show boxing being offered a good product from the promoter?
is the tv coverage up to the standard we would expect and hope for?
are we happy with the viewing times?
are we happy with the characters that present / panel these shows?
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 14:46
by Spud
You are a pr*ck!!!
A very sad pr*ck!!!
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 14:51
by Foggy
pepsi wrote:You are a pr*ck!!!
A very sad pr*ck!!!
Fairly harsh
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 21:53
by JimmyJamJerusalem
I don't know if Photocopier is trying to wind wrists up directly, but I must say I was NOT impressed at shelling out £15 odd quid for the Hatton bill!!! It was an awful undercard. I complained to Sky, and they basically told me to f**k off.
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 09:19
by TerribleTerry
JimmyJamJerusalem wrote:I don't know if Photocopier is trying to wind wrists up directly, but I must say I was NOT impressed at shelling out £15 odd quid for the Hatton bill!!! It was an awful undercard. I complained to Sky, and they basically told me to f**k off.
You were right to feel done - next to no live boxing other then the main event and a replay from a week ago. Sky took the pi55 with that one IMO.
Its not like they are new to PPV - they have no excuses.
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 09:27
by jamesmcdonnell
It was a very poor bill, it must be said.
Posted: 22 Dec 2005, 15:04
by rhino222
pepsi wrote:You are a pr*ck!!!
A very sad pr*ck!!!
ha ha.....you need some chill pills spudly !!
