Ricky Hatton: 'The Ring' Fighter Of The Year
Posted: 21 Dec 2005, 17:36
The article is confusing, did the first Brit win it in 1928 or was 1928 just the year the award was first given out?Max Molyneux wrote:Wow first British fighter to reiceive it since 1928.![]()
Well done Hatton.
"Hatton is the first-ever British boxer to receive the award since its inception in 1928."Cannibal wrote: The article is confusing, did the first Brit win it in 1928 or was 1928 just the year the award was first given out?
My personal choice was Lorenzo Parra, beating 3 top 10 guys in their countries.jamesmcdonnell wrote:I must say, I'm a little surprised.
Just goes to show, that the Yanks do actually rate some of our fighters. Not sure I feel it is entirely deserved, but then again, who else has a stronger case.
Taylor barely squeaked by Hopkins in two dismally boring fights.
Mayweather hasn't beaten anyone of note this year.
No heavyweight has really shone this year.
Winky only beat a shell of Trinidad.
Castillo lost to Corralles, and vice versa.
Morales got beat, Pacquaio too, Barrera not done much since beating Morales.
If Taylor and Winky get it on, the winner has a strong case next year.
He's already been awarded the Ring's belt. I think that each fighter who receives such a belt does get to keep it, as each belt is personalised.Foggy wrote:Does Hatton get awarded anything, like a ring Belt for keeps ????
Danny Williams... :)liamlion wrote:Who else in world boxing, this year, has destroyed and effectively ended the career of a top three pound-4-pound fighting machine and future hall of famer?
Jermaine Taylor (no he didn't destroy Hops but did Ricky destroy Zoo?)liamlion wrote:He's already been awarded the Ring's belt. I think that each fighter who receives such a belt does get to keep it, as each belt is personalised.Foggy wrote:Does Hatton get awarded anything, like a ring Belt for keeps ????
I reckon Hatton deserves to be their fighter of the year. Who else in world boxing, this year, has destroyed and effectively ended the career of a top three pound-4-pound fighting machine and future hall of famer?
Ricky stopped Tszyu, Taylor never stopped Hopkins.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Jermaine Taylor (no he didn't destroy Hops but did Ricky destroy Zoo?)liamlion wrote:He's already been awarded the Ring's belt. I think that each fighter who receives such a belt does get to keep it, as each belt is personalised.Foggy wrote:Does Hatton get awarded anything, like a ring Belt for keeps ????
I reckon Hatton deserves to be their fighter of the year. Who else in world boxing, this year, has destroyed and effectively ended the career of a top three pound-4-pound fighting machine and future hall of famer?
Yes Ricky did destroy Tszyu - left him a beaten man, sitting on his stool.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
Jermaine Taylor (no he didn't destroy Hops but did Ricky destroy Zoo?)
Good call, can't argue with his achievements this year. Shame the lower weights are ignored, Parra would have been a shout had he been in a higher division.Freiheit wrote:My personal choice was Lorenzo Parra, beating 3 top 10 guys in their countries.
lennox had a good year 2000.Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:Why did Lennox never win it??? Surely in his reign he should of been deserving in 1 of those years?
An American by any chance ? I see exciting Hatton fights not ugly ones.Jabba The Nut wrote:I dont rate Hatton,
I used too, and then he started wrestling his opponents during every bout!
Each fight is becoming more ugly.
Neri1983 wrote:An American by any chance ? I see exciting Hatton fights not ugly ones.Jabba The Nut wrote:I dont rate Hatton,
I used too, and then he started wrestling his opponents during every bout!
Each fight is becoming more ugly.
Neri1983 wrote:Excellent body punches, surprisingly good jab, excellent workrate, marauding style, exciting fighter all FACTS too. Just my opinion.