Page 1 of 1
Lol at Toney
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 08:50
by Max Molyneux
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/4711022.stm
He even agrees that Ruiz was robbed.
Doe he want to eat the canvas though if he fought Lennox?
All these heavyweights wanting Lennox is kinda proving that they don't want to unify and take the easy to the linear ship by beat the last real champ.
I agree he'd whoop Valuev though.
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 08:58
by Achybreaky
I found the funniest part of the interview was when he talked about himself in the third person at the end. Quality

Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 13:56
by jomothepure
Shows how piss poor the heavyweight division is when the "contenders" have to shout out Lewis as the most credible opponent going
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 14:15
by nickd
Why is Toney mentioning Valuev? He cant fight for the WBA title after cheating.
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 14:27
by jomothepure
nickd wrote:Why is Toney mentioning Valuev? He cant fight for the WBA title after cheating.
Oh, of course, I forgot about that. Boxing's fantastic impression to all. Get caught cheating/doping, you're banned from being WBA champ. But it's ok to be a WBC champ
Boxing's moral message to the young: get caught cheating in your french a-level exams, and we'll take it away (and let you sit the german one instead.)
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 14:27
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
jomothepure wrote:Shows how piss poor the heavyweight division is when the "contenders" have to shout out Lewis as the most credible opponent going
Fighting LEwis now is like LEwis fighting Tyson - the biggest money fight out there.
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 15:00
by hitman_hatton1
jomothepure wrote:Boxing's moral message to the young: get caught cheating in your french a-level exams, and we'll take it away (and let you sit the german one instead.)
haha good one.
i think toney unifies the division. just get him the fights and he cleans up at the moment.
Re: Lol at Toney
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 16:57
by JoshLucas
Max Molyneux wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/4711022.stm
He even agrees that Ruiz was robbed.
Doe he want to eat the canvas though if he fought Lennox?
All these heavyweights wanting Lennox is kinda proving that they don't want to unify and take the easy to the linear ship by beat the last real champ.
I agree he'd whoop Valuev though.
I recently watched the Ruiz-Valuev fight and there is no way Valuev did enough to take away Ruiz's title. Now Valuev is not going to fight on April 1st due to some injury.
Re: Lol at Toney
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 16:58
by JoshLucas
Max Molyneux wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/4711022.stm
He even agrees that Ruiz was robbed.
Doe he want to eat the canvas though if he fought Lennox?
All these heavyweights wanting Lennox is kinda proving that they don't want to unify and take the easy to the linear ship by beat the last real champ.
I agree he'd whoop Valuev though.
I recently watched the Ruiz-Valuev fight and there is no way Valuev did enough to take away Ruiz's title. Now Valuev is not going to fight on April 1st due to some injury.
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 17:22
by Max Molyneux
nickd wrote:Why is Toney mentioning Valuev? He cant fight for the WBA title after cheating.
They are still ranking him too!

Re: Lol at Toney
Posted: 14 Feb 2006, 22:29
by shoutout
JoshLucas wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/4711022.stm
He even agrees that Ruiz was robbed.
Doe he want to eat the canvas though if he fought Lennox?
All these heavyweights wanting Lennox is kinda proving that they don't want to unify and take the easy to the linear ship by beat the last real champ.
I agree he'd whoop Valuev though.
I recently watched the Ruiz-Valuev fight and there is no way Valuev did enough to take away Ruiz's title. Now Valuev is not going to fight on April 1st due to some injury.
i expect valuev to follow in vitali's footsteps...not in a good sense, but more like the tailend of his career when he was constantly postponing fights...
the "sasquatch" is an incredibly unworthy "champ" who will milk his ill-gotten wba belt for all its worth!!!
Posted: 15 Feb 2006, 06:28
by jomothepure
Max Molyneux wrote:nickd wrote:Why is Toney mentioning Valuev? He cant fight for the WBA title after cheating.
They are still ranking him too!

That's absolutely criminal. Not that they'll reply, but I've e-mailed them asking how they justify ranking Toney when they've just stripped him as champion and won't put him in a title fight for 2 years. Ludicrous