Page 1 of 2

More censorship from Box Rec

Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 11:50
by boxingchat
A perfectly valid subject get's taken off again. I thought communism was dead!

Why is it only Warren can be slagged off on here?

Billy GRahsm made a complete mess of a simple thing and you sweep it under the carpet (Which you probably got from Papa Hatton)

Put it back on Boxrec, you're pathetic.

Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 12:50
by nickd
You know where the door is, and take Lirva with you while you're at it.

Re: More censorship from Box Rec

Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 12:53
by MightyWarrior
boxingchat wrote:
Why is it only Warren can be slagged off on here?
No, everyone gets slagged off here on a first come first served basis.

You just have to get in line :TU:

And no idea what post you're talking about - your Billy Graham post appears here as well.

Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 13:36
by Deserter
nickd wrote:You know where the door is, and take Lirva with you while you're at it.
Absolutely :TU:

Re: More censorship from Box Rec

Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 13:42
by KOJOE90
boxingchat wrote:Put it back on Boxrec, you're pathetic.
What thread are you talking about?

Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 12:30
by steve689
Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:

Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 13:15
by stujones
No idea also.

Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 13:53
by boxingchat
steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.

Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 13:54
by nickd
boxingchat wrote:
steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
Stop trying to worm out of it and admit you've made a complete twat of yourself yet again. :lol: :lol:

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 08:55
by J
boxingchat wrote:
steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:08
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
J wrote:
boxingchat wrote:
steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped :lol:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.
You fantasise about Steve giving Boxingchat a throat job?

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:14
by Goz
Pro-Warren prick has some front accusing someone else of censorship.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:23
by J
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:
J wrote:
boxingchat wrote: Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.
You fantasise about Steve giving Boxingchat a throat job?
no i dont but i do find referrIng to someones incarceration and poking fun at it offensive.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:34
by lirva33
im on boxingchats side here.

the mods have a lot to answer for for their actions.

Steve should know better than to take a pop. He should expect a pop back.

Lirva.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:37
by J
Steve's reponse was boxing related not personal.

boxing chats response is out of line.

end of.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:09
by Loynesy
Agreed - Steve made a light hearted reference and in response had someone responding with a personal insult from the safety of a keyboard.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:12
by Goz
I think Lirva is fully aware of that guys and:

1 - Is either Boxingchat himself or

2 - Just being a prick for the sake of it

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:30
by Neri
lirva33 wrote:im on boxingchats side here.
That goes without saying, considering you and boxingchat are the same person.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:35
by Freiheit
Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:37
by TerribleTerry
Loynesy wrote:Agreed - Steve made a light hearted reference and in response had someone responding with a personal insult from the safety of a keyboard.
The internet is full of 'keyboard warriors' like BC. :cry:

I doubt Steve gets wound up by his lame taunts. BC is a fool and has been shown up as such on here more times then I care to remember.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:38
by jamesmcdonnell
Every heard of a proxy server?

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:39
by nickd
Freiheit wrote:Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers
That proves nothing! Its easy for the same person to post from 2 different IP addresses if they want to.

How about banning both of 'their' IP addresses and be done with it?

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:42
by The Law
Freiheit wrote:Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers
Which isn't hard to do via an anonymous proxy .......

........ btw my other username is Freiheit, I occasionally use a Scandinavian proxy. So in a sense I'm replying to myself :wink:

Denne lag er frygtelig :TU:

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:44
by Freiheit
Dont know any about proxy servers, but fact is that within 3 minutes boxingchat posted, then lirva then boxingchat, and the two IPs were different.

Lag???

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:46
by The Law
Freiheit wrote:Dont know any about proxy servers, but fact is that within 3 minutes boxingchat posted, then lirva then boxingchat, and the two IPs were different.

Lag???
There's always a lag with proxy servers. The connection is never quite the same speed as your normal connection.

jeez, why am I replying to myself again? :lol: