Page 1 of 2
More censorship from Box Rec
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 11:50
by boxingchat
A perfectly valid subject get's taken off again. I thought communism was dead!
Why is it only Warren can be slagged off on here?
Billy GRahsm made a complete mess of a simple thing and you sweep it under the carpet (Which you probably got from Papa Hatton)
Put it back on Boxrec, you're pathetic.
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 12:50
by nickd
You know where the door is, and take Lirva with you while you're at it.
Re: More censorship from Box Rec
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 12:53
by MightyWarrior
boxingchat wrote:
Why is it only Warren can be slagged off on here?
No, everyone gets slagged off here on a first come first served basis.
You just have to get in line
And no idea what post you're talking about - your Billy Graham post appears here as well.
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 13:36
by Deserter
nickd wrote:You know where the door is, and take Lirva with you while you're at it.
Absolutely

Re: More censorship from Box Rec
Posted: 21 Mar 2006, 13:42
by KOJOE90
boxingchat wrote:Put it back on Boxrec, you're pathetic.
What thread are you talking about?
Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 12:30
by steve689
Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped

Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 13:15
by stujones
No idea also.
Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 13:53
by boxingchat
steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped

Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
Posted: 22 Mar 2006, 13:54
by nickd
boxingchat wrote:steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped

Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
Stop trying to worm out of it and admit you've made a complete twat of yourself yet again.

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 08:55
by J
boxingchat wrote:steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped

Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:08
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
J wrote:boxingchat wrote:steve689 wrote:Which topic are you on about Boxingchat? Your Billy Graham topic is still here unless you've made a mistake...wouldn't be the first time, we all remember The Hatton/Barrera bollock you dropped

Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.
You fantasise about Steve giving Boxingchat a throat job?
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:14
by Goz
Pro-Warren prick has some front accusing someone else of censorship.
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:23
by J
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:J wrote:boxingchat wrote:
Well it won't be that one then will it, now go and mop the landing Godbar.
i hope steve meets you one day and fornicating pokes these words down your throat.
You fantasise about Steve giving Boxingchat a throat job?
no i dont but i do find referrIng to someones incarceration and poking fun at it offensive.
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:34
by lirva33
im on boxingchats side here.
the mods have a lot to answer for for their actions.
Steve should know better than to take a pop. He should expect a pop back.
Lirva.
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 09:37
by J
Steve's reponse was boxing related not personal.
boxing chats response is out of line.
end of.
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:09
by Loynesy
Agreed - Steve made a light hearted reference and in response had someone responding with a personal insult from the safety of a keyboard.
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:12
by Goz
I think Lirva is fully aware of that guys and:
1 - Is either Boxingchat himself or
2 - Just being a prick for the sake of it
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:30
by Neri
lirva33 wrote:im on boxingchats side here.
That goes without saying, considering you and boxingchat are the same person.
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:35
by Freiheit
Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:37
by TerribleTerry
Loynesy wrote:Agreed - Steve made a light hearted reference and in response had someone responding with a personal insult from the safety of a keyboard.
The internet is full of 'keyboard warriors' like BC.
I doubt Steve gets wound up by his lame taunts. BC is a fool and has been shown up as such on here more times then I care to remember.
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:38
by jamesmcdonnell
Every heard of a proxy server?
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:39
by nickd
Freiheit wrote:Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers
That proves nothing! Its easy for the same person to post from 2 different IP addresses if they want to.
How about banning both of 'their' IP addresses and be done with it?
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:42
by The Law
Freiheit wrote:Lirva and boxingchat are not the same person, posting from different IP numbers
Which isn't hard to do via an anonymous proxy .......
........ btw my other username is Freiheit, I occasionally use a Scandinavian proxy. So in a sense I'm replying to myself
Denne lag er frygtelig

Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:44
by Freiheit
Dont know any about proxy servers, but fact is that within 3 minutes boxingchat posted, then lirva then boxingchat, and the two IPs were different.
Lag???
Posted: 23 Mar 2006, 11:46
by The Law
Freiheit wrote:Dont know any about proxy servers, but fact is that within 3 minutes boxingchat posted, then lirva then boxingchat, and the two IPs were different.
Lag???
There's always a lag with proxy servers. The connection is never quite the same speed as your normal connection.
jeez, why am I replying to myself again?
