Vitali - Bruno
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 18:01
How many?
Bruno could hurt him though with that left hook!
Page 1 of 2
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 18:04
No way would he easily use his height on Bruno like he did with most of the crap he fought.
Bruno could hurt him though with that left hook!
Bruno could hurt him though with that left hook!
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 18:07
What crap. This is about the point you start blabbernig on about Kessler and Ottke.
Here's one; How long would Ottke have to be on his back before a German ref counted him out??
A. 10 mins
B. 2hrs
C. Never he'd DQ the opponent for violent conduct.
Here's one; How long would Ottke have to be on his back before a German ref counted him out??
A. 10 mins
B. 2hrs
C. Never he'd DQ the opponent for violent conduct.
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 18:10
It seems you doJimmyJamJerusalem wrote:What crap. This is about the point you start blabbernig on about Kessler and Ottke.
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 18:10
I'd go with C. 
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 18:11
So in the third round Bruno kisses the ring dust.Max Molyneux wrote:I'd go with C.
Incidentally, this is how I have it too.
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 18:15
When did this forum turn into 'Max vs. Pundit'?
It's fornicating pathetic.
It's fornicating pathetic.
Posted: 05 Apr 2006, 18:16
Vitali might win but not that easy.
Bruno fought in a better Era too.
Plus I don't rate Vitali that high.
Bruno fought in a better Era too.
Plus I don't rate Vitali that high.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 05:36
If Bruno caught him in the early rounds like Sanders did, by by Vitali.Max Molyneux wrote:Vitali might win but not that easy.
Bruno fought in a better Era too.
Plus I don't rate Vitali that high.
Otherwise Vitali by late stoppage.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 05:57
Vitali late KO, Vitali's size and volume of shots would spell disaster for Bruno, but the jab would keep him in it early.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 07:23
have to agree with this.this thread is stupid really.bruno lasted 5 rounds with a prime tyson and 7 with prime lewis(both fighters who would beat klits no doubt)so why would vitali klits blow him out in 3?!?jamesmcdonnell wrote:Vitali late KO, Vitali's size and volume of shots would spell disaster for Bruno, but the jab would keep him in it early.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 07:26
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 07:40
states wrote:When did this forum turn into 'Max vs. Pundit'?
It's fornicating pathetic.
ah, sorry, but I can understand pundit. This Max guy could drive you to craziness if you take his statements serious......
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 07:41
I'm looking for a poll of how many times pundit's had a girlfriend nicked by a Brit
10, 15 or 20
10, 15 or 20
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 07:55
interesting one....
Klitchko only faced two punchers... one cut his face to pieces, the other was only fit enough to fight one round....
Bruno was stopped by great punches from great punchers.....
Klitchkos stamina was suspect himself so it would be wrong to assume that Bruno would tire and he wouldnt.
Bruno could outjab Vitali early on.... and i think he could do enough damage in this time to either
a) cut up Vitali and force a stoppage
b) tire out Vitali enough so when Frank started to tire himself he could ride a points victory....
Klitchko only faced two punchers... one cut his face to pieces, the other was only fit enough to fight one round....
Bruno was stopped by great punches from great punchers.....
Klitchkos stamina was suspect himself so it would be wrong to assume that Bruno would tire and he wouldnt.
Bruno could outjab Vitali early on.... and i think he could do enough damage in this time to either
a) cut up Vitali and force a stoppage
b) tire out Vitali enough so when Frank started to tire himself he could ride a points victory....
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 08:36
Dude you rated Schmeling past Lewis so your as bad!BubiScholz wrote:states wrote:When did this forum turn into 'Max vs. Pundit'?
It's fornicating pathetic.
ah, sorry, but I can understand pundit. This Max guy could drive you to craziness if you take his statements serious......
Bruno could beat Vitali though and was skilled than most of the guys Vitali fought except Lewis.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 08:49
agreed bubster.BubiScholz wrote:states wrote:When did this forum turn into 'Max vs. Pundit'?
It's fornicating pathetic.
ah, sorry, but I can understand pundit. This Max guy could drive you to craziness if you take his statements serious......
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 09:26
....and the world is a discMax Molyneux wrote:
Bruno could beat Vitali though and was skilled than most of the guys Vitali fought except Lewis.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 09:31
Agree completely with this postknockout wrote:interesting one....
Klitchko only faced two punchers... one cut his face to pieces, the other was only fit enough to fight one round....
Bruno was stopped by great punches from great punchers.....
Klitchkos stamina was suspect himself so it would be wrong to assume that Bruno would tire and he wouldnt.
Bruno could outjab Vitali early on.... and i think he could do enough damage in this time to either
a) cut up Vitali and force a stoppage
b) tire out Vitali enough so when Frank started to tire himself he could ride a points victory....
Vitali fought 1 fighter better than Bruno and thats Lewis. Bruno may have beat or come close against that old Lewis too. How would Vitali do against a prime Lewis and Tyson - not any better than Bruno imo.
Vitali could win this 1 late but Vitali tyres late too. Vitali was not a puncher compared to the monstorous punchers Bruno got stopped.
Bruno could really bang and was possibly the hardest hitter of the era. Don't rule out Bruno KO'ing Vitali in the early rounds if Vitali gets shaken and does a road runner act against Sanders, Bruno could stop him early.
On a stylistic note, Bruno had a better jab (he outboxed prime Lewis with it), Vitali seems to react better when tagged and may be a little tougher, Bruno has a better chin (not going down against Tysons and Lewis best onslaughts), Vitali has better stamina.
So all in Bruno early or Vitali late
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 09:34
Indeed.BubiScholz wrote:....and the world is a discMax Molyneux wrote:
Bruno could beat Vitali though and was skilled than most of the guys Vitali fought except Lewis.
Livra can;t talk after all the posts made by him about the bet!
Vitali also didn't like it to the body so Bruno could hurt him there even more and Vitali's stamina wasn't so good either.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 09:41
comparing Bruno and Vitali is like comparing Damon Hill with Niki Lauda, Michael Schumacher or Ayrton Senna. Every German Taxi-Driver would have won the World Championship with the Williams-Super-Car.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 09:42
Max Molyneux wrote:Indeed.BubiScholz wrote:....and the world is a discMax Molyneux wrote:
Bruno could beat Vitali though and was skilled than most of the guys Vitali fought except Lewis.
Livra can;t talk after all the posts made by him about the bet!
Vitali also didn't like it to the body so Bruno could hurt him there even more and Vitali's stamina wasn't so good either.
maybe, but lirva is not on drugs like you.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 09:43
Dude, I dion't watch F-1 so make sense.
Vitali was overated for losing.
Vitali was overated for losing.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 09:45
No it isn't. Who did Vitali beat that makes him so superior to Bruno? Fatman Sanders? Fatman Johnson, or losing to an aged Lewis.
Hell, Bruno was well ahead on points going into the fateful round against Lewis, and took a hell of a battering before going down.
Hell, Bruno was well ahead on points going into the fateful round against Lewis, and took a hell of a battering before going down.
Posted: 06 Apr 2006, 14:04
Exactly Vitali never proved himself any more than Bruno
Bruno beat McCall, Coetzee, Coetzer, James Tillis, Bugner, Ribalta which is probably as good as Sanders, Williams, Hide, Johnson, Donald.
Bruno beat McCall, Coetzee, Coetzer, James Tillis, Bugner, Ribalta which is probably as good as Sanders, Williams, Hide, Johnson, Donald.