Page 1 of 1
Jake la motta or marcel cerdan?
Posted: 14 Apr 2006, 23:55
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
who was the better middleweight? and who would have won the rematch?
Posted: 15 Apr 2006, 01:38
by Jaclem
...i don't understand those numbers and odds ...... i can't dispute them...i just don't understand them.
back to the question....the answer is lamotta.
this should have the record for being ther shortest thread in the history of this forum...it won't be.....but it should.
Posted: 15 Apr 2006, 02:33
by HomicideHenry
Cerdan had bad shoulder by time he faced La Motta, and lost to La Motta in defense of his title. Hell even the Europeans were saying he was already on the downside before he beat Tony Zale for the title.
Maybe if Cerdan had both his shoulders in good condition...he would have prolly beaten LaMotta. But considering he wouldnt of had two good shoulders in the rematch...LaMotta would have taken him out.
Posted: 15 Apr 2006, 03:07
by surf-bat
Marcel Cerdan by a wide margin