BoxRec

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:06**

The worst decision ive ever seen all three judges give it to the italian. Im stunned!!!!

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:09**

what the fornicate were those judges watching.

the italian was landing with single shots all night and not putting fornicate all together.

kelly was countering and scoring in combo's.

kelly got screwed and i think that decision was fishy.

the swiss judge should be fired. :x

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:11**

Kelly won all but two rounds and landed twice as many shots!!!! The worst ive ever seen....mental!! the judges should be ashamed

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:11**

I had 116-112 for Kelly..........................fornicating disgraceful .

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:15**

BigEars wrote:I had 116-112 for Kelly..........................fornicating disgraceful .

that's as close as u could have it for the italian.

the swiss judge by 7 rds now and not the read out 6. :x

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:23**

10-2 Kelly.

Worst decision I have ever seen, even worse the Hagler vs Antuofermo.

Some people think it might be a case of Kelly getting an over due bad decision going against him, but that was horrible.

and as for that prick from the BBBoC. What an arse, he's not going to help Kelly - the twat.

As you can see I am seething at this.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:24**

I found an piece from Italy regarding the fight, they dont agree with you (via bablefish):

For me Maludrottu of tightest measure has won and me it seemed outside from the world cartellino of the former world-wide champion Jim Watt... anche the cartellino of the Swiss is exaggerated I feared but the factor field, as I feared it to Madrid, instead all good. Maludrottu has attacked and come ahead x 36 minuteren, sure also Kelly has not been to watch

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:26**

Freiheit wrote:I found an piece from Italy regarding the fight, they dont agree with you (via bablefish):

For me Maludrottu of tightest measure has won and me it seemed outside from the world cartellino of the former world-wide champion Jim Watt... anche the cartellino of the Swiss is exaggerated I feared but the factor field, as I feared it to Madrid, instead all good. Maludrottu has attacked and come ahead x 36 minuteren, sure also Kelly has not been to watch

No wonder there is so many dodgy decisions there then.

Sorry, Kelly boxed his brains off.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:27**

Freiheit wrote:I found an piece from Italy regarding the fight, they dont agree with you (via bablefish):

For me Maludrottu of tightest measure has won and me it seemed outside from the world cartellino of the former world-wide champion Jim Watt... anche the cartellino of the Swiss is exaggerated I feared but the factor field, as I feared it to Madrid, instead all good. Maludrottu has attacked and come ahead x 36 minuteren, sure also Kelly has not been to watch

another one on the italian's payroll.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:28**

fornicating disgusting decision and Charles Giles made it even worst with his fence sitting interview. As clear a decision as there has ever been.

I bet Jeff Lacy would have won with those three morons judging.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:29**

Why would kelly bother fighting on after this travesty what with the prick from the board of control as good as saying that fornicate all will be done. nelson spoke a lot of truth in the post fight banter and basically came as close as possible to calling your man a liar without crossing the line.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:29**

Couldnt agree more about the bbboc rep. Absolutely spineless.
Its no wonder boxing in general is in such decline, I was genuinely expecting some of the crowd to storm the ring when the decision was announced.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:31**

postmanpat wrote:Couldnt agree more about the bbboc rep. Absolutely spineless.
Its no wonder boxing in general is in such decline, I was genuinely expecting some of the crowd to storm the ring when the decision was announced.

The minute that arse turned Robinson's first question to "let me just firstly say that the fight was of highest quality" I was tamping.

"I don't score fights" - what a dick.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:35**

How could this happen in belfast against the home figher.......

fornicating DISGRACEFUL

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:39**

martin_g wrote:How could this happen in belfast against the home figher.......

fornicating DISGRACEFUL

that's what makes it's so unbelieveable for me. away from home u have to expect that sort of stuff, but not at fornicating home. :x

for all 3 judges to have it for the italian was also a strange one.

definitely a fix if u ask me.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:40**

I had Kelly as the winner, he boxed fantastic. This is part of the judges guidelines from the http://www.boxebu.com website:

BASIS FUNDAMENTALS FOR SCORING

A -70%: Effective aggressiveness is the most important factor for winning a round. The scoring of clean punches with power, number and accuracy, whether moving forward, backwards, boxing sideways against the ropes or counter punching.

B -20%: Ring Generalship: If an advantage is not found in “A”, whoever dominates the round with boxing skills to control the action and does not allow his rival to perform.

C -10%: Pure aggressiveness. If in doubt at the end of the round, it must be scored in favor of the aggressor, the one who goes decidedly after his rival, who forces the action to win the round, against a boxer who only runs away and does not stop to fight.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:40**

This is why I think that after a fight the judges should sit with a panel, re-watch the fight and explain their scoring.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:41**

If he's the Chairman how bad must the others be?

If he knew anything about Boxing he would not have been oit of line to say the scoring was a disgrace but basically said fornicate all would be done.

Watch out Michael Hunter and Alex Arthur I say.

Also, one point is, why did Gilmour allow all foreign judges in the first place?

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:42**

YES THEY SHOULD....AND THEN SACKED

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:42**

Charles Giles is a spineless 'yes man'!! He didn't want to cross his board paymasters. They're gonna try to sweep this under the rug!

And Freiheit, dispite the article, believe us when we tell you this was a stone cold robbery. Maludrottu was dejected then totally surprised when he got the verdict. Kelly landed on the stats over double the amout of punches and his normally cut up face was almost without damage.

Can the judges be just that plain incompetant?? I don't believe they can be that stupid. I think theirs no doubt whatsoever that they where bought, the swiss judges card was a shocker. Those fans should have tore that place apart and strung up the judges!

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:42**

All on the italian forum mondoboxe have Maludrottu winning, and I know from MSN that some of you brits also have Maludrottu winning.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:42**

If he's the Chairman how bad must the others be?

If he knew anything about Boxing he would not have been oit of line to say the scoring was a disgrace but basically said fornicate all would be done.

Watch out Michael Hunter and Alex Arthur I say.

Also, one point is, why did Gilmour allow all foreign judges in the first place?

With Morrison getting beat and Anderson about to be Gilmour's luck is looking bad.

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:44**

Freiheit wrote:Because its an EBU fight where you actualy have neutral judges!

What, they were neutral?

Blimey, I'd hate to see bias ones!

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:47**

VERY TRUE COS WE ALL KNOW WHATS IT IS LIKE IN ITALY

Posted: **21 Apr 2006, 18:49**

Freiheit wrote:All on the italian forum mondoboxe have Maludrottu winning, and I know from MSN that some of you brits also have Maludrottu winning.

Well then the guys on that forum are a bunch of fornicating blind retards. This verdict just isn't even worth debating. If you score rounds for someone for following the other guy around the ring eating punch after punch then sure, score it for the Italian.

BoxRec

Kelly Robbed

Kelly Robbed