BoxRec

Where Are You "Boxing Twat From Brentwood Who Crys when he is sacked"??

You are full of information ... but I have seen sight of a letter from the WBA sanctioning the Ricky Hatton and Luiz Collazo bout ... Very surprised you have not informed the forum!!!

Instead of making bold statements ... you should do what I do ... Stick to making the tea you bell end!!!

Moderators ... it would be appreciated if this post stayed ... our friend boxingtwat has made enough of his own statements ... its time for a few of us to make our own!!!

I thought we'd hear from Spud on the matter.... Still, cheers for the info. I'm not sure if it's good or not. Yes, it helps now that it's for a title (after all, what was the point of fighting Collazzo otherwise?) But will the WBA insist on Hatton facing Urkal, should Ricky win? It's hardly worth it if that's the case. I can see Hatton winning the belt, but dropping it before his next fight, if I'm being honest. Shows how much belts are worth, really.

At last the confusion is over. So is Urkal being paid step aside money?

Someone has kept the WBA BAG MAN sweet then.
No surprise there then: there's enough $$$$ to go around.....you'd have thought.

Good news all round - hate to think Ricky had dumped his titles for nada.

looks like that taxi is back on bc.

u got the woods fight not on sky bit wrong as well.

taxi for boxingchat.

states wrote:I thought we'd hear from Spud on the matter.... Still, cheers for the info. I'm not sure if it's good or not. Yes, it helps now that it's for a title (after all, what was the point of fighting Collazzo otherwise?) But will the WBA insist on Hatton facing Urkal, should Ricky win? It's hardly worth it if that's the case. I can see Hatton winning the belt, but dropping it before his next fight, if I'm being honest. Shows how much belts are worth, really.

me?

hitman_hatton1 wrote:looks like that taxi is back on bc.

u got the woods fight not on sky bit wrong as well.

taxi for boxingchat.

Yeah but look at the Woods and Hatton cards. Poor quality and certainly not worth PPV

I might download it from one of the websites for about £2. Thats about all its worth.

The Hatton match is a good one, can see Ricky losing it. Much better than he's been given credit for is Collazo.

pepsi wrote:Where Are You "Boxing Twat From Brentwood Who Crys when he is sacked"??

You are full of information ... but I have seen sight of a letter from the WBA sanctioning the Ricky Hatton and Luiz Collazo bout ... Very surprised you have not informed the forum!!!

Instead of making bold statements ... you should do what I do ... Stick to making the tea you bell end!!!

Moderators ... it would be appreciated if this post stayed ... our friend boxingtwat has made enough of his own statements ... its time for a few of us to make our own!!!

?????????????????? WTF is this all about?

Spud and Boxingchat...

this could get tedious

Look Spud, you bald headed bastard, why don't you just fu*k off back to your own forum??

This baldy c*nt is the laughing stock of boxing forums. He started out on ESB and made countless enemies by banning people and acting the hard man. Then he went to doghouse and the same thing happened. He was criticising Hatton bigtime before he started working for the same company that promotes him. Now he loves Hatton. He's an absolute joke and I would personally like to tell him to f*ck off!!

Not to mention Lirva, Boxingchat's personal fluffer.....

I don't think we really need a history lesson Lirva, many of us here are well aware of who Spud is....he's still entitled to post here.

Actually in no way do I want to cause any problems for this forum ... in fact stayed away unless of course provoked by unnecessary b*llocks and false statements given by certain posters on this forum ...

BoxingTw*t ... as already stated or hinted at is no better than me ... yep thats right "odd job man" "tea boy" or "promoters bitch" whatever title he wants to give himself in my opinion it is one of the 3 contained within this paragraph ...

Boxing is a fantastic sport ... but it seems the odd poster on this forum and in particular I name "boxingtwat" seems to relish and have great joy in belittling and going well below the belt with his comments concerning other promoters or boxers ... indeed it seems a lot of his statements on here could get him in a lot of trouble if certain personalities decided to pursue the matter in legal terms ...

It seems "boxingtwat" does not have the spine or the bollocks to name himself and front up the scandulous comments he has made in recent months ... in his pathetic world he can't ever seem to admit he is wrong and now he knows his time is up and one way or another he will be brought to account for the outrageous statements he has made he has lost his bottle ...

I will say nothing else on the matter unless of course the insults continue to flow ...

It is great in my opinion Ricky is fighting in America ... regardless of opinion he has a great team around him from the Legal Team right down to the "odd job man" ... all he needs now is for the fans to get behind him for Saturday!!! ... I know most boxing fans will and they really want Ricky to win and go on to even bigger and better things ... it is just a shame that behind the scenes the malicious, sad and pathetic world of back stabbing in boxing continues to rear its ugly head ... the cake in boxing is huge and there is a big slice for all to enjoy without the continued bollocks that goes on ...

It is really time for all to move on ... whether it be those at the top or us fans who visit these forums ..

Good Luck Boxrec ... you have a brilliant forum here ... I will only visit as promised many months ago ... when falsehoods are stated or unnecessary insults continue to flow ...

lirva33 ... you really do need to get your information correct before you make the statements you do!!![/b] ... I feel you may need some form of medical assistance as you seem overly aggressive and a tadge unstable ... I could recommend a very good doctor if you would like my help in this matter ...

Anyhow ... Back to boxing!!!

pepsi wrote:Actually in no way do I want to cause any problems for this forum ... in fact stayed away unless of course provoked by unnecessary b*llocks and false statements given by certain posters on this forum ...

BoxingTw*t ... as already stated or hinted at is no better than me ... yep thats right "odd job man" "tea boy" or "promoters bitch" whatever title he wants to give himself in my opinion it is one of the 3 contained within this paragraph ...

Boxing is a fantastic sport ... but it seems the odd poster on this forum and in particular I name "boxingtwat" seems to relish and have great joy in belittling and going well below the belt with his comments concerning other promoters or boxers ... indeed it seems a lot of his statements on here could get him in a lot of trouble if certain personalities decided to pursue the matter in legal terms ...

It seems "boxingtwat" does not have the spine or the bollocks to name himself and front up the scandulous comments he has made in recent months ... in his pathetic world he can't ever seem to admit he is wrong and now he knows his time is up and one way or another he will be brought to account for the outrageous statements he has made he has lost his bottle ...

I will say nothing else on the matter unless of course the insults continue to flow ...

It is great in my opinion Ricky is fighting in America ... regardless of opinion he has a great team around him from the Legal Team right down to the "odd job man" ... all he needs now is for the fans to get behind him for Saturday!!! ... I know most boxing fans will and they really want Ricky to win and go on to even bigger and better things ... it is just a shame that behind the scenes the malicious, sad and pathetic world of back stabbing in boxing continues to rear its ugly head ... the cake in boxing is huge and there is a big slice for all to enjoy without the continued bollocks that goes on ...

It is really time for all to move on ... whether it be those at the top or us fans who visit these forums ..

Good Luck Boxrec ... you have a brilliant forum here ... I will only visit as promised many months ago ... when falsehoods are stated or unnecessary insults continue to flow ...

lirva33 ... you really do need to get your information correct before you make the statements you do!!![/b] ... I feel you may need some form of medical assistance as you seem overly aggressive and a tadge unstable ... I could recommend a very good doctor if you would like my help in this matter ...

Anyhow ... Back to boxing!!!

F*ck off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

boxingchat is a fu*king fair man and he adds spice to the boards. He knows what he is talking about. Instead of banging on about the VERY FEW times he was wrong, why don't you talk about the VERY MANY times he was right!!!!

Fu*k off you baldy bastard!!

Viva boxingchat!!

Must say that Boxingchat does actually offer a good deal to these boards, despite his obvious (and humourous) bias. I'm all for people saying what they think, legal matters should not be an issue.

Shouldn't this belong on the local elections thread?

KO Artist wrote:

hitman_hatton1 wrote:looks like that taxi is back on bc.

u got the woods fight not on sky bit wrong as well.

taxi for boxingchat.

Yeah but look at the Woods and Hatton cards. Poor quality and certainly not worth PPV

I might download it from one of the websites for about £2. Thats about all its worth.

The Hatton match is a good one, can see Ricky losing it. Much better than he's been given credit for is Collazo.

No offence intended but why are you always backing/defending boxingchat?

lvlarc_uk wrote:

KO Artist wrote:

hitman_hatton1 wrote:looks like that taxi is back on bc.

u got the woods fight not on sky bit wrong as well.

taxi for boxingchat.

Yeah but look at the Woods and Hatton cards. Poor quality and certainly not worth PPV

I might download it from one of the websites for about £2. Thats about all its worth.

The Hatton match is a good one, can see Ricky losing it. Much better than he's been given credit for is Collazo.

No offence intended but why are you always backing/defending boxingchat?

None taken. Check my posts i'm not always backing him.

Youve used my last post as an example, but BC hasnt said that the Hatton/Woods card isnt worth PPV has he?

I make my own mind up, employ myslef and pay myself. I have no desire nor any need to back/defend anyone except myself.

By the way do you think its worth PPV?

I think there are far too many cards being sold as PPV's now.

Mayorga-De La Hoya, christ they even got away with Tarver-Jones 3 as PPV. I think the Yanks had to pay $50 each for these and it didn't have any decent undercard to support it.

Last time I paid for a UK PPV was Klitschko V Williams, think it was £15 what a mess that turned out to be.

Nowadays any top ranked fighter can be a PPV fighter, Hatton is now a PPV fighter, so if he can get the buys then good for him.

I wont be paying for it though.

[quote="johnswan1"]Must say that Boxingchat does actually offer a good deal to these boards, despite his obvious (and humourous) bias. I'm all for people saying what they think, legal matters should not be an issue.[
/quote]

have to say i agree

i thought everyone knew the name of boxing chat. i certainly do, and so does everyone i know in boxing ...

AND THERE'S NO WAY SPUD DOESN'T KNOW IT!!!!

Yes I think everyone knows who boxingchat is, and everyone knows who pepsi is too: a shill for......who is it this week? Oh yes, FA!

I find it amazing that Spud thinks he's scored a point when clearly, if he actually knew anything about Boxing at all. He had never even been to a fight before 2000 when he latched onto to Frank Maloney's shirt-tale and told the world how Julius Francis was gonna do Tyson (Exactly, nuff said)
He would know that it was only a judge who allowed the WBA to sanction Hatton V Collazo, less than a week before the fight (Is that normal Spud?) and in return the WBA have agreed to pay M'Baye significant damages and the Promoters have to pay Urkal a step-aside fee. Hatton has to fight Urkal next if he is to keep his WBA Welterweight crown (Providing he wins, which barring a freak result he will, easily) and Urkal will the be the #1 contender in much the same way as M'Baye is at 140 lbs. Interesting to see who will be jointly-representing Urkal won't it?

By the way Spud and everyone else, I am not who you think I am and I am no-ones bitch or odd job man or anything otherwise and I certainly have never and would never compare myself to you in any way, I get a wage for my efforts! Moreover, I haven't had to join the Army to get a wage either. I heard from Frank Maloney that you weren't even good enough to be a real soldier so you had a desk Job, how Al-Quaeda must have breathed a huge sigh of relief when you finally left the forces!

As for Hatton having a good team around him.......please.

I repeat, the games not over till the fat lady sings...........

Now run along Spud......theres a good BOY.

Handbags at yawn!...

Oh, and by the way Spud, the WBA have still not approved this fight. Urkal has asked for $200k to allow the 'proposal' to go ahead. At present no agreement has been rubber-stamped by either Urkal or the WBA. I suggest you get your facts right and find out the latest goings-on beofre you post remarks like this.

Oh, you might be wondering how I found out this information? Is Christian Meyer good enough for you?

666th post boxingchat - a mark of the devil? Oh and I had a little flutter that this won't be for the WBA based on your inside knowledge BC