Page 1 of 1
ITV Boxing - 13/05/06 (Spoiler)
Posted: 13 May 2006, 17:58
by steve689
Decided not to order the Hatton fight so watching the ITV bill now. Mitchell won in two rounds but his opponent was 38 and coming to the end, no point in this fight to be honest he should move to British level. Same with Tony Doherty, wasting time, treading water.
Can't be arsed to review the rest of the card

Maybe someone can help me out.
Posted: 13 May 2006, 18:04
by My T Sharp
Danny Hunt got into a tear-up with the "rough house" Monir Guebbas. Guebbas found a honey punch with the uppercut and also cut Hunt badly over both eyes. This forced Hunt to go for broke and he almost decked Guebbas (who had never been stopped before). The ref got the cuts cleaned up a few times, but unfortunately they were too bad and he stopped the fight.
On a side note, if Hatton gets cut like that tonight do you think it will go straight to the doctor (like them seem to do in the US), or do you think the ref give Ricky's corner a round or two to sort it out like what normally happens in the UK

Posted: 13 May 2006, 18:07
by Paul_Griffin
was the minter fight cancelled?
Posted: 13 May 2006, 18:11
by My T Sharp
Paul_Griffin wrote:was the minter fight cancelled?
Yep, he suffered a perforated ear-drum in his last sparring session leading up to the show.
Posted: 13 May 2006, 18:25
by koomey
My T Sharp wrote:
Danny Hunt got into a tear-up with the "rough house" Monir Guebbas. Guebbas found a honey punch with the uppercut and also cut Hunt badly over both eyes. This forced Hunt to go for broke and he almost decked Guebbas (who had never been stopped before). The ref got the cuts cleaned up a few times, but unfortunately they were too bad and he stopped the fight.
On a side note, if Hatton gets cut like that tonight do you think it will go straight to the doctor (like them seem to do in the US), or do you think the ref give Ricky's corner a round or two to sort it out like what normally happens in the UK

Indeed, thr Hunt fight was a good tear-up, always a shame when a boxer loses by cuts stoppage.
You do tend to find in the US that ref's aren't always keen to let boxers go on if it's a bad cut, but I have seen it happen. Also, Hatton's team should have/will have had a word with the ref about his tendancy to cut and hopefully cut him some slack if it can wait till the break.
Koomey
Posted: 13 May 2006, 18:27
by koomey
p.s. - once again ITV's coverage was complate wank...
Jim Rawling and Duke McKenzie haven't got a fornicating clue when it comes to commentating and McGuigan just gets on my nerves these days...
KOomey
Posted: 13 May 2006, 18:36
by Taki...
koomey wrote:p.s. - once again ITV's coverage was complate wank...
Jim Rawling and Duke McKenzie haven't got a fornicating clue when it comes to commentating and McGuigan just gets on my nerves these days...
KOomey
Barry's the man... you're right about the other two tossers though.
Posted: 13 May 2006, 21:09
by Lefthookhappy19
The commentary was laughable! I swear, whenever Mitchell fights the commentators seem to mention every 30 seconds how he's "a really big puncher". Take note guys, repeating this over and over again isn't going to suddenly make it come true. He's just not. Accept it and STFU. Also made some false statements regarding his opponents record failing to mention his horrible recent form. Why is he still fighting these guys? Come on now, this is getting ridiculus. I can honestly say ive never seen worse opposition all the way through for a prospect.
Posted: 13 May 2006, 21:38
by ebeneezer
Does Mitchell still look like a reject from Blazin Squad?
Posted: 14 May 2006, 09:28
by My T Sharp
Lefthookhappy19 wrote:Why is he still fighting these guys? Come on now, this is getting ridiculus. I can honestly say ive never seen worse opposition all the way through for a prospect.
I think the problem which has held back Mitchell is that he normally boxes too wild looking for the KO, so he can't be trusted against any fighters with any kind of power. Despite the opponent he showed a bit of maturity, so he might get stepped up soon...
Posted: 14 May 2006, 09:56
by bennie
Some of you don't know when you're on to a good thing. Live boxing on ITV and Sky on the same night.
Remember the bad days...
Posted: 14 May 2006, 10:14
by Lefthookhappy19
PPV for Hatton. Im not gonna get down on my knee's and thank Sky for supplying more boxing with which I have to pay for on top of my monthly subscription. Is everyone that desperate for boxing that they will watch any old shite thats put on?? Give us a decent match. How bout throwing Mitchell in with that guy Murray fought, now thats a real test.
Posted: 14 May 2006, 12:20
by steve689
I'm not complaining so much on the commentary and analysis but the quality of Mitchell and Doherty's opponents it frustrating, when will they be stepped up? Hunt-Guebbas was a war! Thoroughly enjoyed that fight.
Posted: 14 May 2006, 12:33
by bennie
steve689 wrote:I'm not complaining so much on the commentary and analysis but the quality of Mitchell and Doherty's opponents it frustrating, when will they be stepped up? Hunt-Guebbas was a war! Thoroughly enjoyed that fight.
Doherty fights Taz Jones again in Cardiff on July 8 (many felt Jones was robbed the first time they met).
Mitchell, still only 21, is Frankie's favourite. Ultra-caution with him.
Posted: 14 May 2006, 13:12
by Old bones Ian
Monir Guebbas is a tough man, he just won't give up in a fight, Gave Mitchell and Murray good workouts as well, Wouldn't mind seeing him as an opponent for Khan
Posted: 14 May 2006, 13:26
by WildWaylon
Taki... wrote:koomey wrote:p.s. - once again ITV's coverage was complate wank...
Jim Rawling and Duke McKenzie haven't got a fornicating clue when it comes to commentating and McGuigan just gets on my nerves these days...
KOomey
Barry's the man... you're right about the other two tossers though.
Duke would agree oranges are green if jim said they were - Yes Barry does know his stuff
Posted: 14 May 2006, 13:59
by vargas
I was impressed with Mitchell in that he took his time and picked his shots alot better than his last fight. IMO he'd beat either Corcoran or Johanneson for the British title, and then could fight for the European when Arthur vacates.
Hunt/Guebbas was a great fight (while it lasted) and I'd love to see a rematch. Tony Doherty looked decent although there's no reason for him to be fighting such poor opposition.
Posted: 14 May 2006, 15:24
by Lefthookhappy19
Carl Johannesen would pulverise Mitchell. Mitchell's people wouldn't dare make that fight. Seriously, Mitchell is way to open defensively to fight Johannesen.
Posted: 14 May 2006, 15:54
by KO Artist
wildwaylon wrote:Taki... wrote:koomey wrote:p.s. - once again ITV's coverage was complate wank...
Jim Rawling and Duke McKenzie haven't got a fornicating clue when it comes to commentating and McGuigan just gets on my nerves these days...
KOomey
Barry's the man... you're right about the other two tossers though.
Duke would agree oranges are green if jim said they were - Yes Barry does know his stuff
You are talking bollocks. Duke knows his stuff. You should show him more respect.
Posted: 14 May 2006, 15:55
by rod riddle
I was impressed with Mitchell in that he took his time and picked his shots alot better than his last fight.
Come on - he was just mugging granny in there.
It seems like Mitchell wants to bypass the domestic scene. How on earth he's going to do that is anybody's guess:
Mitchell will now look to make a quick defence of his title, although he is out of the running for a crack at the British super-featherweight crown after withdrawing from an eliminating contest with John Murray.
Straight from the panto donkey's arse on allegedly.tv
Spare us the bother.
[/quote]