BoxRec

I always said Hatton would struggle with slick fighters.

I always said that his avoidance of witter, judah, corley, mayweather and mitchell was no fluke.

Looks like I am 100% right.

Hatton has feasted on 135 pounders and no hopers FOR YEARS. LOOK at his record, he is nothing more than a BULLY.

he fought an old Tszyu and got by mainly due to Tszyu being inactive and coming off a career threatning injury and being 35. He had a VERY HARD TIME against Maussa.

THEN he fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight.

HE LOST THE FIGHT!

Damn I feel SOOOOOO GOOD! Now the nuthuggers have been silenced and they have NO RESPONSE to this showing because Hatton SHOWED he is one dimensional and would have been KO'd if it was a 13 rounder.

lirva33 wrote:I always said Hatton would struggle with slick fighters.

I always said that his avoidance of witter, judah, corley, mayweather and mitchell was no fluke.

Looks like I am 100% right.

Hatton has feasted on 135 pounders and no hopers FOR YEARS. LOOK at his record, he is nothing more than a BULLY.

he fought an old Tszyu and got by mainly due to Tszyu being inactive and coming off a career threatning injury and being 35. He had a VERY HARD TIME against Maussa.

THEN he fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight.

HE LOST THE FIGHT!

Damn I feel SOOOOOO GOOD! Now the nuthuggers have been silenced and they have NO RESPONSE to this showing because Hatton SHOWED he is one dimensional and would have been KO'd if it was a 13 rounder.

Who got the decision? Was hatton KO'd?

achybreaky wrote:

lirva33 wrote:I always said Hatton would struggle with slick fighters.

I always said that his avoidance of witter, judah, corley, mayweather and mitchell was no fluke.

Looks like I am 100% right.

Hatton has feasted on 135 pounders and no hopers FOR YEARS. LOOK at his record, he is nothing more than a BULLY.

he fought an old Tszyu and got by mainly due to Tszyu being inactive and coming off a career threatning injury and being 35. He had a VERY HARD TIME against Maussa.

THEN he fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight.

HE LOST THE FIGHT!

Damn I feel SOOOOOO GOOD! Now the nuthuggers have been silenced and they have NO RESPONSE to this showing because Hatton SHOWED he is one dimensional and would have been KO'd if it was a 13 rounder.

Who got the decision? Was hatton KO'd?

The first nutrider arrives on the scene!

Hatton was stumbling around like a Saturday night drunk against a man that was KO'D In 3 ROUNDS by Cassini.

Hatton fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight

but of course he can still beat Floyd.

lirva33 wrote:

achybreaky wrote:

lirva33 wrote:I always said Hatton would struggle with slick fighters.

I always said that his avoidance of witter, judah, corley, mayweather and mitchell was no fluke.

Looks like I am 100% right.

Hatton has feasted on 135 pounders and no hopers FOR YEARS. LOOK at his record, he is nothing more than a BULLY.

he fought an old Tszyu and got by mainly due to Tszyu being inactive and coming off a career threatning injury and being 35. He had a VERY HARD TIME against Maussa.

THEN he fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight.

HE LOST THE FIGHT!

Damn I feel SOOOOOO GOOD! Now the nuthuggers have been silenced and they have NO RESPONSE to this showing because Hatton SHOWED he is one dimensional and would have been KO'd if it was a 13 rounder.

Who got the decision? Was hatton KO'd?

The first nutrider arrives on the scene!

Hatton was stumbling around like a Saturday night drunk against a man that was KO'D In 3 ROUNDS by Cassini.

Hatton fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight

but of course he can still beat Floyd.

Hatton didnt lose the fight.

achybreaky wrote:

lirva33 wrote:

achybreaky wrote: Who got the decision? Was hatton KO'd?

The first nutrider arrives on the scene!

Hatton was stumbling around like a Saturday night drunk against a man that was KO'D In 3 ROUNDS by Cassini.

Hatton fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight

but of course he can still beat Floyd.

Hatton didnt lose the fight.

Come back when you watch the fight son.

lirva33 wrote:

achybreaky wrote:

lirva33 wrote:

The first nutrider arrives on the scene!

Hatton was stumbling around like a Saturday night drunk against a man that was KO'D In 3 ROUNDS by Cassini.

Hatton fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight

but of course he can still beat Floyd.

Hatton didnt lose the fight.

Come back when you watch the fight son.

I just did son and im prettysure hatton was declared the winner, maybe you should watch the fight son.

achybreaky wrote:

lirva33 wrote:

achybreaky wrote: Hatton didnt lose the fight.

Come back when you watch the fight son.

I just did son and im prettysure hatton was declared the winner, maybe you should watch the fight son.

Post your scorecard then??

Oh, you didn't score it. You just blindly watched it.

Man I feel good. Hatton was beaten up by a slick fighter,.

lirva33 wrote:

achybreaky wrote:

lirva33 wrote:

Come back when you watch the fight son.

I just did son and im prettysure hatton was declared the winner, maybe you should watch the fight son.

Post your scorecard then??

Oh, you didn't score it. You just blindly watched it.

Man I feel good. Hatton was beaten up by a slick fighter,.

How can you blindly watch something i would think that would be impossible? I dont have to post a scorecard as there were thankfully three judges at ringside who takes that responsibilty out of my hands. Accept the result and move on.

hatton deserved to win a close fight. give him credit for fighting a bigger guy with world class skills who had a bad style for him - and even winning the fight. no, it wasn't great work from ricky, hopefully it will tell him to move down a divison where he needs to be able to physically dominate guys.

grow up lirva, as terence wrote, hatton put tszyu through an ageing experience. and if you can't believe that tszyu can fold under pressure see the vince phillips fight

hatton seems to be sensible, he's already said he wants to corrales-castillo winner at 140


you told us that collazo would destroy hatton - that it would be obvious that any slick fighter, Corley included, would "destroy him". not that hatton would edge a decision

Lirva talking shit again, He is one of the reasons i cant be arsed to post here much...

Why you fellas tolerate this grade A c.u.n.t I will never know.

HH

Fck off Lirva33, you're not wanted here.

lirva33 wrote:I always said Hatton would struggle with slick fighters.

I always said that his avoidance of witter, judah, corley, mayweather and mitchell was no fluke.

Looks like I am 100% right.

Hatton has feasted on 135 pounders and no hopers FOR YEARS. LOOK at his record, he is nothing more than a BULLY.

he fought an old Tszyu and got by mainly due to Tszyu being inactive and coming off a career threatning injury and being 35. He had a VERY HARD TIME against Maussa.

THEN he fought a slick fighter and LOST the fight.

HE LOST THE FIGHT!

Damn I feel SOOOOOO GOOD! Now the nuthuggers have been silenced and they have NO RESPONSE to this showing because Hatton SHOWED he is one dimensional and would have been KO'd if it was a 13 rounder.

WHAT ARE YOU ON ABOUT,IF THERE WAS A 13TH ROUND.
HATTON WAS COMING BACK AFTER THE SECOND MIN OF THE ROUND..YOU FOOL

Hardhitters11 wrote:Lirva talking shit again, He is one of the reasons i cant be arsed to post here much...

Why you fellas tolerate this grade A c.u.n.t I will never know.

HH

I agree HH. I can't understand why the mods on here put up with the silly twat. It's obvious he should be binned.

I watched the fight, scoring it round by round (albeit in my head, I haven't got a paper record). I had it to Hatton by a round. And when that happens, you have to concede it could have gone the other way. But winning a close fight was right by me.

Certainly exposed some flaws in Ricky's game though.

viciousmaussa wrote:hatton deserved to win a close fight. give him credit for fighting a bigger guy with world class skills who had a bad style for him - and even winning the fight. no, it wasn't great work from ricky, hopefully it will tell him to move down a divison where he needs to be able to physically dominate guys.

grow up lirva, as terence wrote, hatton put tszyu through an ageing experience. and if you can't believe that tszyu can fold under pressure see the vince phillips fight

hatton seems to be sensible, he's already said he wants to corrales-castillo winner at 140


you told us that collazo would destroy hatton - that it would be obvious that any slick fighter, Corley included, would "destroy him". not that hatton would edge a decision

Show me where I said Hatton would lose to Collazo?

Collazo was KO'd in 3 by Edwin Cassini, and is a non puncher.

But Hatton is so one dimensional that a slickish fighter gives him maxximum problems and has him stumbling all over the shop.

Like fornicate Mitchell would beat Hatton.

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:

Hardhitters11 wrote:Lirva talking shit again, He is one of the reasons i cant be arsed to post here much...

Why you fellas tolerate this grade A c.u.n.t I will never know.

HH

I agree HH. I can't understand why the mods on here put up with the silly twat. It's obvious he should be binned.

I watched the fight, scoring it round by round (albeit in my head, I haven't got a paper record). I had it to Hatton by a round. And when that happens, you have to concede it could have gone the other way. But winning a close fight was right by me.

Certainly exposed some flaws in Ricky's game though.

I had it so close as you did either could have won - As you have to take take the belt from a champion and it was in America with three American Judges I thought Colazzo had got the decision

i just made a topic confronting lirva saying that he should present something useful to the forum or get lost and it got moved into record enquiries! all the crap he says, and my topic gets moved into record enquiries so no one will read it everyone go into record enquiries and vote in the poll about lirva in there. Pleeeeeease, for the sake of good conversation.

He obviously thrives on this kind of response. Everyone should agree not to post on his threads and ignore him. He would soon fade away.

Neri1983 wrote:He obviously thrives on this kind of response. Everyone should agree not to post on his threads and ignore him. He would soon fade away.

ould do that, he gets off on the attention, from now on no1 speak to him or reply to anything he says because he doesnt deserve our informed opinions... or tantum's opinions either.

I don't understand why he's still here TBH. If he trolled on most other boxing sites he would of been banned by now, why can't the admins do their job here and get rid of this fornicator?

lvlarc_uk wrote:I don't understand why he's still here TBH. If he trolled on most other boxing sites he would of been banned by now, why can't the admins do their job here and get rid of this fornicator?

Agreed. No one minds lively debate but he takes it to another level and crosses the line on many occasions.

I agreed with Jim Watt's score of 114 - 113 to Hatton in close one!

Callazo was better than most of us including me thought.

Livra should go to ESB, alot there think Callazo wasrobbed too.

Get this fornicator banned.

jeej wrote:Get this fornicator banned.

Well I can agree when he said he's like to see Hatton wearing an oxygen mask.

lirva33 wrote:

viciousmaussa wrote:hatton deserved to win a close fight. give him credit for fighting a bigger guy with world class skills who had a bad style for him - and even winning the fight. no, it wasn't great work from ricky, hopefully it will tell him to move down a divison where he needs to be able to physically dominate guys.

grow up lirva, as terence wrote, hatton put tszyu through an ageing experience. and if you can't believe that tszyu can fold under pressure see the vince phillips fight

hatton seems to be sensible, he's already said he wants to corrales-castillo winner at 140


you told us that collazo would destroy hatton - that it would be obvious that any slick fighter, Corley included, would "destroy him". not that hatton would edge a decision

Show me where I said Hatton would lose to Collazo?

Collazo was KO'd in 3 by Edwin Cassini, and is a non puncher.

But Hatton is so one dimensional that a slickish fighter gives him maxximum problems and has him stumbling all over the shop.

you said "it's obvious that any slick fighter would destroy hatton," you liar. when i objected, you said "anothe ridiot who knows nothing about styles".