BoxRec

Computerank:
I don't quite understand what the new stuff means. Looking at the 1930s bantams, can you give a sample explanation of what this page means:
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php/B ... ght--1930s

Ric wrote:Computerank:
I don't quite understand what the new stuff means. Looking at the 1930s bantams, can you give a sample explanation of what this page means:
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php/B ... ght--1930s

.. sure, I will ...

Now you can see for every year:

- top 10 bouts - measure for quality is rating of lower rated boxer - you can see both ratings before the bout, home advantage of 125 points regarded
- top 15 boxers in weight division

The Top 10 Fights of the Year (by Division), measured by what factor(s)? This explanation then should be put on the BoxRec Annual ratings Home Page to offer guidance to the Wiki visitor.

Ric wrote:The Top 10 Fights of the Year (by Division), measured by what factor(s)? This explanation then should be put on the BoxRec Annual ratings Home Page to offer guidance to the Wiki visitor.

Ric,

you are right, no doubt.

I will do so.

Thanks and best regards
Martin

Then you will be entrusted with the responsiblity of ferreting out the nonsense and bringing good sense and logic to this theoretical novice.

Decagon wrote:This is definitely going to give me a headache. It won't be long before I'm stuck arguing about Rocky Marciano's competition with a guy who's never even seen Marciano, but is using this feature.

What do you mean? Computerrank is listing actual, not theoritical, fights in each Top Ten Fights of the Year.