Page 1 of 1

Peak fight

Posted: 31 Jul 2006, 18:31
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
stick to the subject only. this is a marciano thread, but its a much different kind of marciano thread than ur used to.




amatoboxing article on rocky marciano interview 1957


marciano says "rex layne was my peak fight"


Recently the first new discovery of an Egyptian tomb was found in the valley of the kings since Harold Carter discovered King Tut back in 1922. Also recently discovered was a rare interview of Rocky Marciano by Ring magazine writer Dan Daniel. During the time Rocky was champ Al Weill his manager stated "Rocky does the fighting and I do the talking", and so it was. So it is particularly interesting to hear Marciano speak freely as this interview was taken almost 50 years ago in May 1957 shortly after Marciano retired and he speaks for himself and the ex champs views are sometime surprising and eliminate many myths. Here are some of the things Rocky Marciano was thinking back in 1957." I have another beef and it is against the rules of boxing. I am conducting a one man campaign to force the announcement of the rulings of the referee and the judges after every round. .......Suppose the umpire in a ball game kept his mouth shut and his hands at his sides while the batter took his turn. Then the umpire hollered your out or take your base. Would the fans stand for that ? Then why keep a boxer in the dark for ten or fifteen rounds ? In my own experience missed round by round verdicts in my first fight with Joe Walcott,and in my first one with Roland La Starza. Goldman kept telling me I was behind. I thought I was ahead. If it's close you always figure you are in front." This is interesting to me as it contradicts the idea that Rocky came of for the thirteenth round with Walcott figuring he needed a knockout to win that has been the stuff of myth. Referring to the real reason he retired Rocky said of all the writers who had theories .""Who actually hit the ball on the head ?nobody.Why did I quit ? Primarily because I could not fit comfortably into a schedule of two fights a year.I invariably made a bad showing in the first one.You remember my battle with Don Cockell in San Francisco ? It was awful . I had trained harder for that contest than any other.I had boxed 240 rounds and had worked for three months. I was in great shape but as a fight it was no fun for me.I was a big favorite. He was supposed to be a bum .I let him stay around much too long.Then I began to worry about losing my stuff .Training became a routine,a tough chore. I found myself telling Charlie Goldman, let's cut down to a couple rounds today. I had been eager. I had been learning. Suddenly the eagerness was gone and the zest for learning went with it..

After the Cockell mess I began to talk to old fighters.They told me that they had retired two fights after they should have.quit. I made up my mind not to let that happen to me ". Marciano is often thought of as almost a machine however in this interview he shows how human he was as his motivation and confidence slipped badly after the Cockell fight. The interviewed continued."My determination, my desire to fight returned strong for the bout with Archie Moore. He had been running a campaign, popping off and getting me sore. I wanted to whip him badly and quickly. I was good for that fight .The experts say it was my best. I liked my work that night but in my own little book, my six round knockout of Rex Layne on my way to the title was my best.Not once that night did Goldman have to coach me. I did everything right by instinct.Charlie kept saying good , keep it up .You are hurting him.My fight with Moore restored my confidence in myself. I knew than that I was not slipping." Marciano apparently felt that no matter how well he did they experts never gave him the credit he deserved and the writer Dan Daniel got this quote from Rocky."After the Moore fight in the dressing room the experts showered me with questions. Nobody asked me about the fight or about my technique.They didn't ask me about if had succeeded in sticking to my plan.I was good against Moore ,even ouboxed him in some rounds. I had to get low to hurt him and I forced him to fight my kind of fight.But how many writers said that ? It was the old story .Marciano can't be good. He is just a awkward champion.They merely wanted to know,.Rocky are you quitting the ring ? " Nat Fleischer in a article about the ex champ had called Rocky "fat". Rocky apparently took offense because he stated."Take a good look at me. Do I look fat as a porker and completely out of shape? I am down to 215 pounds." Asked about Floyd Patterson the new champ Rocky said," a nice kid. He's humble quiet and well behaved. I had to do all the talking in a 20 minute meeting I had with him. Patterson will find ,as I did that two fights a year is tough. He will find that fighting for a living as champion is tough.I was in my camp for Moore ,when Tommy Loughran visited my camp. He said to me , Rocky you work too furiously. You batter your sparring partners. Let up.I said Tommy I cannot change .I have to train that way because I don't get to fight often enough. The greatest experience of my career was when I knocked out four men inside a month. That's how I liked to fight. That was in 1950. I belted out Phil Muscato, then Joe Dominck then a third guy and finally stopped Carmine Vingo." Later in the interview Marciano contrasted this with his inactivity before the La Starza fight." I then sat around without a fight for four months before tacking La Starza .I was bad. I had become stable worn. Let me say before closing out this little talk that I won't return . I want boxing to remember me as I was the night of my knockout over Moore,the undefeated champion of the world." Then Marciano hastened back to his wife and four year old daughter. He pointed to his ear and said "look no cauliflower" then roared off in his car. I was rather kidding comparing the interview to the Egypt find but many,many things have been written about Marciano but how many times did Rocky himself say things ? Not many, so the interview I thought would be good fun and interesting as to insights into the man for readers. - amato boxing.com





nice interview. rocky believes his peak was rex layne.








wuts my opinion?



I no hardly anyone(especially my pro marciano fans) share this same opinion but its my opinion that the joe louis fight in 1951 was marcianos peak. he was 28 full of youthness and firepower. his handspeed looked faster in this fight than in some of his later fights. all his power was here. he was a fighting machine. he went right after louis the whole fight. he completley dominated and outphysicaled a much bigger dangerous skilled opponent. he was using both hands throughout the fight and marcianos was getting his full power into every shot. the knockout through the ropes, NO ONE EVER DID THAT TO JOE LOUIS. that was a deadly finish as ever, he knocked louis out cold. that was a hungry lion finishing off his prey. he also the whole fight prevented louis from really unleashing on marciano. besides a couple hard left hooks and his powerful left jab(the best jab in the division), marciano kept louis from unleashing on him the whole fight. louis still had a hard left hook he hit marciano flush at the end of the 1st round and marciano stood there and took it. the punch obviousely hurt, but then all of a sudden marciano fires a fast powerful overhand right as the bell rings buckling louis knees! marciano even did a bit more bobbin and weaving in this fight than any other fight. even if marcianos crouch wasnt fully refined yet, i believe marcianos physical tools and power overlapped his defense. marciano physically was at his complete best. there was nothing stopping him. this was his peak.goldman got too cocky. he polished rocky up so much by 1951-52 that he thought he would be able to keep going and make him even more polished. so wut did goldman do? he changed marcianos style thus making him lose power. by 1955 marciano was actually becomming an arm puncher. i didnt like the change in marcianos style at all. he was hitting charles, cockell, moore repeadtley but they werent going down. marcianos power was not there anymore. he was more methodical and aging, he didnt unleash his deadly firepower and didnt put guys lights out like he did in 1951-52.i think 1951 joe louis fight was marcianos peak, but hey thats just my opinion.



so both I and rocky are in agreement 1951 was his peak, though we both have different opinions on which fight it was against

Posted: 31 Jul 2006, 18:37
by BoxBuzz
Perfect place for yet another Rocky moment. BB....your on a roll. All good reads yet lacking the variety that I so often search for in the best of novels.

Posted: 31 Jul 2006, 18:38
by granberry
Ever hear of paragraphs?

Try reposting it---with paragraphs.

Will be much easier to read.

.

Posted: 31 Jul 2006, 18:44
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
BoxBuzz wrote:Perfect place for yet another Rocky moment. BB....your on a roll. All good reads yet lacking the variety that I so often search for in the best of novels.

this is a very interesting interview, read it. this is about rocky marcianos peak, not about how great he was

Posted: 31 Jul 2006, 23:56
by sockdolager
granberry wrote:Ever hear of paragraphs?

Try reposting it---with paragraphs.

Will be much easier to read.

.
you are a cranky one heh? hehehe, it would be easier to read w/ paragraphs, however your crankyness amuses me!

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 01:54
by evndrbsn
I still think you overate his win over Joe Louis. Yes, he looked real good, but against an over-the-hill former champ. I know your arguments because I've read them all before, but I don't completely agree. Joe Louis was still capable, but he wasn't championship calibre anymore.

It is much like Muhammad Ali's much ballyhooed win over Cleveland Williams. It was pretty and all, but what exactly did it mean? Williams was shot by this point, still able to hang in there with most, but not on that so important championship level.

Marciano's win over Rex Layne, who was at his fighting best himself at that point, and his KO over Archie Moore are much more credible than his win over Louis. I think the Marciano of the Louis fight, while maybe more powerful, loses to the more refined Marciano of '55. Then again, who knows? The man never lost, so its hard to judge his best reliably.

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 03:22
by granberry
sockdollanger wrote:
granberry wrote:Ever hear of paragraphs?

Try reposting it---with paragraphs.

Will be much easier to read.

.
you are a cranky one heh? hehehe, it would be easier to read w/ paragraphs, however your crankyness amuses me!
Suggesting an improvement that would make what is posted easier to read is not "crankyness."

Your crankyness amuses me!

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 04:11
by computerrank
I looked at Boxrec Annual Ratings and the Top 10 Annual Bouts:

http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php/B ... eavyweight

- Marfciano defeated his hightest rated opponent Archie Moore in 1955

-- 1950 1772.1
-- 1951 1837.4
-- 1952 1761.9
-- 1953 1611.9
-- 1954 1709.1
-- 1955 2003.5


1950-03-24 1709.9 1772.1 W MD Rocky Marciano vs. Roland LaStarza

1951-10-26 1878.5 1794.1 L KO Joe Louis vs. Rocky Marciano
1951-07-12 1696.4 1837.4 W KO Rocky Marciano vs. Rex Layne

1952-07-28 1837.2 1761.9 W KO Rocky Marciano vs. Harry 'Kid' Matthews
1952-09-23 1911.7 1701.6 W KO Rocky Marciano vs. Jersey Joe Walcott

1953-05-15 1895.8 1611.9 W KO Rocky Marciano vs. Jersey Joe Walcott
1953-09-24 1911.5 1547.4 W TKO Rocky Marciano vs. Roland LaStarza

1954-06-17 1709.1 1903.6 L UD Ezzard Charles vs. Rocky Marciano
1954-09-17 1634.7 1942.0 L KO Ezzard Charles vs. Rocky Marciano

1955-09-21 1957.3 2003.5 W KO Rocky Marciano vs. Archie Moore
1955-05-16 1917.2 1659.3 W TKO Rocky Marciano vs. Don Cockell

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 11:52
by HomicideHenry
I kind of agree in Rocky's statement, because if I recall correctly, when he had the computer fight with Ali he asked Woroner if his fight with Rex Layne was in his 'best' fights, and Woroner said No, that only Marciano's 5 best years was placed in the computer, as was Ali's five best years.

Layne was at the time considered to be the next HW champion, that he was going to be a real force in the division---but his punching power seemed to have no effect on Marciano at all, considering Layne had a KO percentage rate of nearly 70%. Marciano bombed him out in the 6th.

It may surprise some people that Marciano did face men with very good power and he beat them rather easily---Harry 'Kid' Matthews had a 70% KO average, Eddie Ross had a 88% KO average, Louis had a 78% KO average, Walcott had 60% and Moore had 73%.

Myself personally, I never thought he really ever lost his prime, but he lost his one-punch power---only because he shortened up his punches, Goldman changed his style a bit. Marciano still threw punches in bunches, he had greater stamina and durability than anyone in those days, and no doubt hit harder than anyone.

That's why guys like Cockell and Moore lasted long. But you have to remember Moore went down 5 times, and Cockell was all over the place as well. My personal opinion---his peak fight---was against Roland LaStarza the second time around. The first fight had been so close, and the second fight was just a brutal fight, where LaStarza's arms were broken and Marciano kept hammering away.

His best fights in my opinion were: LaStarza(2), Charles (1 & 2), Louis, Matthews, Savold, Walcott (1 & 2) and Moore.

But possibly the most brutal and grotesque Marciano fight I have ever seen was the Carmine Vingo fight, there is a picture of that fight, and it's really a testament to Marciano's power, Vingo's face didn't look like a human face, eyes rolling in the back of his head, blood everywhere and ghastly. Vingo never fought again---it was that brutal, Marciano practically killed him.

As far as Louis not being 'championship calibre' when he faced Marciano, Louis was ranked #1 in the world at that time, in my opinion he could have beaten virtually every other man in the world but the big three: Marciano, Charles and Walcott. Louis was like George Foreman was in the 80's and 90's, in his comeback---that's the only way I can compare him at that time. Sure he didn't have the fast hands that he used to have, but his experience alone made up the difference.

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 16:44
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
savold? rocky sucked vs savold. it was his worst fight! he had the flu which is why he didnt have his power or snap in his punches that night



rex layne is by far one of marcianos best preformanes on film

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 17:02
by granberry
IrishRufusMurphy wrote:
I
It may surprise some people that Marciano did face men with very good power and he beat them rather easily---Harry 'Kid' Matthews had a 70% KO average, Eddie Ross had a 88% KO average, Louis had a 78% KO average, Walcott had 60% and Moore had 73%.
That shows what garbage "KO percentages" are.

Harry 'Kid' Matthews was a lightheavyweight.

Louis was totally washed up and couldn't punch anymore

as shown by his TWO decisions over Cesar Brion and his TWO decisions over Agromente.

.

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 22:56
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
Louis was totally washed up and couldn't punch anymore

as shown by his TWO decisions over Cesar Brion and his TWO decisions over Agromente.
this is bullshit.


wut about his KO over # 2 ranked VERY DURABLE lee savold with 1 punch? louis could still hit hard



louis nearly knocked agramonte out in there 2nd fight. one right hand floored agramonte for 9 in the 2nd round, agramonte was practically counted out.



louis didnt knock these guys out cause they were very good fast defenesive boxers and top contenders. for a man of louis's age its harder for him to knock these kinda men out. it was harder for him to land the clean shot. but he showed when he did land clean like in agramonte II, he could knock u out.


foreman in the 1990s failed to knockout every ranked contender he faced outside of michael moorer, does that mean he still couldnt hit in the 1990s?

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 22:58
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
the hardest hitters marciano faced were 215lb joe louis, jersey joe walcott, archie moore, and rex layne. louis still had good force in his punch(especially left hook), walcott was the hardest hitter marciano faced walcott could really punch, moore was a hard hitter even at heavyweight and one of the best finishers, and layne packed a very heavy right hand.


also it appears carmine vingo was a very hard hitter, at least marciano said so. he claimed "i have never been hit by anything so hard in my life"



big bill wilson also was a decent puncher for a big man. scored 42 KOs in 52 wins though most of his KOs are vs tomatoe cans. though wilson did beat good fighters like eddie mader, buddy knox, and buddy scott.

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 23:01
by granberry
Yes, the washed-up, overweight Joe Louis of the Marciano fight, only able able to throw a left jab ;

he was just terrific.

Posted: 01 Aug 2006, 23:19
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
granberry wrote:Yes, the washed-up, overweight Joe Louis of the Marciano fight, only able able to throw a left jab ;

he was just terrific.
i seem to remember a 1951 joe louis still having a powerful left hook

Posted: 03 Aug 2006, 12:59
by HomicideHenry
http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/Aren ... Savold.jpg

For a sick Marciano in what you call his "worst" fight, looking at the state of Savold's face, I'm sure the man was wishing he didn't face Marciano in any way shape or form, sick or not. Marciano had a way that bordered on ghastly in morphing people's faces into gelatin---Savold's face was so damned awful it was on par with Henry Cooper and Chuck Wepner's cuts in being so bloodied up and broken in.

Not saying that it is Marciano's best performance, and Savold may have been on the downside, but Savold was a "name" fighter with great experience against men like Joe Louis and other top flight contenders, who had a punch, it was surely an important fight to have taken.

Posted: 03 Aug 2006, 13:26
by BrocktonBlockbuster49
savold was washed up when he fought marciano. joe louis gave savold a bad beating and ruined savold in 1951. watch savold vs louis, savold looked a lot faster and better reflexes than the savold of the marciano fight. the savold of the marciano fight had no legs, threw hardly any punches the whole fight, and looked out of shape at 200lb compared to the trim 190lb savold weighed vs louis.


weill had no business sending marciano in vs savold. weill should have sent marciano in vs clarence henry or rematch lastarza