Page 1 of 1

It needs to stop

Posted: 04 Aug 2006, 07:33
by jomothepure
We've had a couple closer to home recently, and now this:

http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/a ... rent_id=29

Posted: 04 Aug 2006, 09:28
by Loynesy
Fair point, but on a point of interest, why were you reading the Gulf Times?

Posted: 04 Aug 2006, 09:35
by jomothepure
Because the Qatar Tribune was offline when I went to read it. Duh! :-?

Posted: 05 Aug 2006, 14:43
by AndreWardFan2006
What needs to stop? The booing for a winning opponent or the home-field advantage that seems to ruin fights? Both i'm assuming.


~A.W.F~

Posted: 05 Aug 2006, 14:45
by jomothepure
Dodgy Judging. Predominantly home-advantage, but not always ie. Kelly fight.

Posted: 05 Aug 2006, 14:48
by AndreWardFan2006
It would be hard to filter through judges, it is a shame that some of them do that.

~A.W.F~

Posted: 05 Aug 2006, 15:01
by jomothepure
I know - it would be hard I guess to filter judges before a fight. But I don't even know whether any of these judges (in, for example) are even questioned or called into question at all.)

The irony is, Beat Hausamann, who gave the widest decision against Kelly in the Maludrottu, is Swiss :) I can't remember the exact line the EBU took after that - something like, well, hmm, quite close, er, Kelly can fight the winner again. Hausamann has meanwhile continued to judge, admittedly not outside Switzerland.

I don't want to particularly go for Hausamann here, but just taking him as an example, has any one from on high bothered/thought about a) questioning his motives b) questioning his ability c) asking him about these two?

We all know it goes on, but when it gets to the level of the Kelly fight or this fight in Japan, then it becomes farcical, and starts to seriously damage the already poor reputation of boxing