Page 1 of 1

Naz released on tag

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 13:03
by Chesney_Chambers
after serving 16 weeks of a 15 month sentence (from Sky Sports news)

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 13:48
by lvlarc
That's just wrong.

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 14:24
by nickd
Always has been and always will be a twat. Now a fat twat.

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 14:52
by steve689
The law is shit and totally unfair, how can they possibly justify him serving only 16 weeks?! Livingstone i didn't hear of those misdemeanours inside either, how come he is being let out after behaving like that? And how come he got sent to an open nick so soon, it's baffling.

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 01:04
by Patrick__
an absolute disgrace.

Livingstone - I couldn't agree more with everything you say.

Barerra v Hamed. I don't think I've enjoyed any fight more than that one. Barerra oozed class, Hamed was shitscared, Barerra took him to pieces.

Adios Prince.

Allah Akbar.

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 03:30
by Britannian Stallion
where did you find about about him going mental and smashing the place up? Personally I think that 4 months inside any prison establishment is a big deal and he wouldn't have been let out if the authorities hadn't deemed it the right decision. Would like to see some pictures of him now though. Is he still the fatster tht he was when he went in?

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 06:07
by Autobarn
Despicable. Look at the consequences of what he did.

I also was never more overjoyed than when Barrera schooled him. Never a more classless, graceless and tactless winner I've ever come across. He also beat a lot of my fave fighters, like Paul Ingle & Vuyani Bungu. So to see him get thoroughly outboxed was a real treat.

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 07:16
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
What a set of miserable bastards, is this how we treat one of the best boxing talent we've had? Be happy when he losses and wish the worst on him?

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 07:55
by fist
I think its fine that he was released on tag. There are currently about 70,000 offenders in custody and the priority has to be dangerous offenders who's risk of harm to the public is medium to high i.e. it is highly likely and almost imminent from release that they will cause serious harm to another person. Naz committed a crime and has spent four months in prison, a few more months will make little difference in relative terms. Ultimately, his risk of re-offending and risk of harm to the public is probably low in that unlike some persistant driving offenders I doubt he will actually jump in a car illegally on being released and put his foot down. Without doubt he was a nob and he has partially paid his price. However, you have to put into perspective with the criminal justice system as a whole and his punishment has been proportionate and in compariosn to some cases more severe, in that I have known a number of cases that have resulted in a Community penalty rather than custody.

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 12:57
by JimJim
Do we know if the victim is going after Naz for damages ? You'd think this would be a straight forward enough case (what with Naz being found guilty of the crime already) for the victim to claim a whopping amount of compensation.

Does anyone know ?

Re: Naz released on tag

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 14:43
by KO Artist
Chesney_Chambers wrote:after serving 16 weeks of a 15 month sentence (from Sky Sports news)
Deplorable, but typical of the justice system under New Labour.

The guy he left for dead should commence a civil suit immediatley and take every penny hamed has.

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 14:57
by mrbassie
It's absurd the way this country panders to criminals, light sentencing, early releases :roll:

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 15:03
by mattym
mrbassie wrote:It's absurd the way this country panders to criminals, light sentencing, early releases :roll:
yeah i know, its no wonder antisocial behaviour is falling rapidly....



thank gawd

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 15:14
by mrbassie
antisocial behaviour is falling? where do you live?

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 15:26
by KO Artist
mrbassie wrote:antisocial behaviour is falling? where do you live?
I think it was tongue in cheek

Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 15:38
by mattym
KO Artist wrote:
mrbassie wrote:antisocial behaviour is falling? where do you live?
I think it was tongue in cheek
ur a clever boy!!! more than can be said for Mr Bassie!!! lol yeah mate it was meant to be the height of sarcasm, sorry its not always clear when you type it just seems like im talking a load of bollox...

Posted: 03 Sep 2006, 14:28
by JimJim
I think the main problem with the sentencing in this country is typified by the Naz Hamed case; sentenced for 15 months, and he does 16 weeks. Why not just pass a 16 week sentence in the first place ?

We regularly see sentences given, and we know that the convict won't see it through.

Most people would like to see some common sense, clarity and consistency applied.

I hope the guy that Naz left for dead takes him to the fxxking cleaners, financially speaking. How can an apparently devoutly religious person like Hamed just drive off and leave somebody in that state ?

Posted: 05 Sep 2006, 15:46
by harrygreb
perhaps he was let out because he posed no danger to anyone making their living from professional boxing

Posted: 05 Sep 2006, 15:56
by SticknMove
At first I thought this thread was titled:

'Naz released on fag'

Which would have been controversial for a completely different reason altogether.

Posted: 05 Sep 2006, 15:58
by nickd
SticknMove wrote:At first I thought this thread was titled:

'Naz released on fag'

Which would have been controversial for a completely different reason altogether.
:lol: :lol:

Posted: 06 Sep 2006, 07:51
by harrygreb
perhaps if he ever gets back in the ring this would be a wise first opponent
for naz

Posted: 06 Sep 2006, 07:57
by Boxingmad
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:What a set of miserable bastards, is this how we treat one of the best boxing talent we've had? Be happy when he losses and wish the worst on him?
The guy is a nasty piece of work and he treats everyone with contempt. The most unpleasant person I've ever come across in boxing. Had the most extraordinary talent ever, but blew it. Evans' article was spot-on.

How can you treat him any other way? I've never met anyone who has nice things to say about him.

Posted: 06 Sep 2006, 08:02
by stujones
Boxingmad wrote:
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:What a set of miserable bastards, is this how we treat one of the best boxing talent we've had? Be happy when he losses and wish the worst on him?
The guy is a nasty piece of work and he treats everyone with contempt. The most unpleasant person I've ever come across in boxing. Had the most extraordinary talent ever, but blew it. Evans' article was spot-on.

How can you treat him any other way? I've never met anyone who has nice things to say about him.
Amir Khan and Chris Eubank did after they kiss and made up.

I couldn't believe his mouth when he was firing criticism at Colin Hart and Barry McGuigan. The cheek to call out a near 40 year old - and Barry especially criticism was constructive.