Page 1 of 1

Who in the Hall of Fame is least deserving of the honor?

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 14:59
by BoxBuzz
Seems like a question that would get a variety of answers. I don't have a single name but a few rolling around in my mind. I want to think about it more before I go on the record here. But it seemed an intriguing question to pose.

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 15:46
by Seamus
Jess Willard, James J Braddock and Ingemar Johansson for starters, and they're are plenty of fighters below heavyweight, who are more deserving than the likes of Baer,Liston and Norton who haven't made it in yet.

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 15:46
by silkov
Bobby Chacon
Kid Chocolate
Joe Brown
Manual Ortiz
Henry Armstrong
......... :box:

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 15:59
by Thunder and Lightning
I would say Clevland Williams deserves the hall less than both Braddock and Johansson being that he has beaten no real big names except for Earnie Terrell and i don't think you deserve the hall for losing to big names.




I hope that atleast the Henry Armstrong bit is a joke.

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 16:01
by pundit
Decagon wrote:Jim Braddock
Willard is worse.

Posted: 01 Sep 2006, 16:20
by silkov
silkov wrote:Bobby Chacon
Kid Chocolate
Joe Brown
Manual Ortiz
Henry Armstrong
......... :box:



PLEASE IGNORE THE ABOVE POST I MISREAD THE THREAD TITLE AND THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT WHO IS THE MOST DESERVING IN THE HALL!!! BIG MISTAKE BUT ITS FRIDAY NIGHT FOLKES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!