Page 1 of 1
Was that fight or faint?
Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 20:51
by mulder
Did they say Barrett had come to Fight or faint?
The farcical Khan band wagon rolls on!.....The initial Knockdown wasn't
that bad but then again if you catch a student doctors skeleton flush, it
will go down but.......
What was the rest about!..............Pathetic!
P T Barnum knew what he was talking about..........Enough of the pudding!........The meat and potatoes were great
Woods was a great example of my last post.
Johnson was superb but Old Father Time hampered him in the later rounds and i think Woods grit swung it
Nice contrast though the best and worst of Boxing on the same bill
What do you think?
Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 20:58
by Hagler2002
Great main event but its beyond me why ITV feel the need to pre-record the undercard fights and then show them, would have been much better with the undercard plenty build up then the main course.....we even got the bloody news half way through the broadcast.
Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 21:10
by josh fg
Can we not have double posts on the same subject the substantive of the debate on Kahn's fight is on the post titled "bloody Nora"
Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 21:28
by mulder
josh fg wrote:Can we not have double posts on the same subject the substantive of the debate on Kahn's fight is on the post titled "bloody Nora"
Whoa! sorry dude
What put the bug up your arse? all the hassle of having to flit between
threads or people having there own thoughts and doing there own thing
POLITICS?........... New Labour......Ill bet
Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 21:39
by josh fg
mulder wrote:josh fg wrote:Can we not have double posts on the same subject the substantive of the debate on Kahn's fight is on the post titled "bloody Nora"
Whoa! sorry dude
What put the bug up your arse? all the hassle of having to flit between
threads or people having there own thoughts and doing there own thing
POLITICS?........... New Labour......Ill bet
if you knew what I do then you'd proberbly retract that statement, more to the point I just wanna make it easier for people to follow the threads, not having a go mate I assumed you just hadn't read the other post it not being well named.
Posted: 02 Sep 2006, 22:06
by mulder
josh fg wrote:mulder wrote:josh fg wrote:Can we not have double posts on the same subject the substantive of the debate on Kahn's fight is on the post titled "bloody Nora"
Whoa! sorry dude
What put the bug up your arse? all the hassle of having to flit between
threads or people having there own thoughts and doing there own thing
POLITICS?........... New Labour......Ill bet
if you knew what I do then you'd proberbly retract that statement, more to the point I just wanna make it easier for people to follow the threads, not having a go mate I assumed you just hadn't read the other post it not being well named.
Wow that's got me curious!
Retraction!!!....it better be good
No offence taken and Point taken
Keep well