Posted: 11 Sep 2006, 17:32
Is this the sort of stuff you write for these mysterious 'other' boxing sites??... no wonder nobodies heard of them!.... 
8)
8) 
BoxRec
Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman
Page 1 of 1
Posted: 11 Sep 2006, 17:35
By the way I loved the way the great Rahman did 'the wobbly' dance against Maskaev recently!... nice one!...
Maskaev
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 02:19
I heard that Maskaev beat Vitali in the amateurs. Does anyone know more about this fight?
re
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 05:14
All I can say is..at least Maskaev had the balls to get in the ring with Rahman...something Vitali certainly lacked!
Re: re
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 06:26
Wasn't that the injury that caused Vtali to retire, the lack of balls?barry wrote:All I can say is..at least Maskaev had the balls to get in the ring with Rahman...something Vitali certainly lacked!
re
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 06:48
>>>Wasn't that the injury that caused Vtali to retire, the lack of balls?<<<
I wouldn't call it an injury...I'd just state it for what it is!
I wouldn't call it an injury...I'd just state it for what it is!
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 08:45
If Vitali was so eager for a rematch with Lewis, why would he be scared of Rahman for Christsakes??... lets be real here!... noone of unbiased sound mind can really believe that Vitali retired because he was scared of Rahman or anyone else for that matter!...
Maybe Rocky Marcinao retired because he was scared of Floyd Patterson???...
Maybe Rocky Marcinao retired because he was scared of Floyd Patterson???...
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 08:47
And they say sports journalism isnt dead!...Decagon wrote:You've never heard of CBS Sportsline?
re
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 08:50
While personally I do not think he retired because of Rahman, he was, nonetheless, a heavyweight who should never be any debates about all-time great heavyweights...unless it is someone talking about Lennox Lewis...who though he was the dominant heavyweight of his era, was he truly an all-time great heavyweight...Vitali certainly was not!
Re: re
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 10:46
Sure you have detailed insider knowledge on this.barry wrote:>>>Wasn't that the injury that caused Vtali to retire, the lack of balls?<<<
I wouldn't call it an injury...I'd just state it for what it is!
Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 10:47
Dull thread.
Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 11:12
Dull yes, but it clearly shows that posters clearly consider Rahman better than Vitali by a WIDE 10-2 margin.pundit wrote:Dull thread.
Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 12:07
I knew you had trouble interpreting polls that don't go your way...The Great John L wrote:Dull yes, but it clearly shows that posters clearly consider Rahman better than Vitali by a WIDE 10-2 margin.pundit wrote:Dull thread.
Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 12:15
OK, it's 11-3. BTW, this isn't my poll.pundit wrote:I knew you had trouble interpreting polls that don't go your way...The Great John L wrote:Dull yes, but it clearly shows that posters clearly consider Rahman better than Vitali by a WIDE 10-2 margin.pundit wrote:Dull thread.
Re: Badly injured Vitali Klitschko vs. Hasim Rahman
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 12:17
Strange, I have it 6-8.The Great John L wrote:OK, it's 11-3. BTW, this isn't my poll.pundit wrote:I knew you had trouble interpreting polls that don't go your way...The Great John L wrote: Dull yes, but it clearly shows that posters clearly consider Rahman better than Vitali by a WIDE 10-2 margin.
No, it's not your poll, your posts don't tend to be that dull.
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 21:43
I suspect this would come out about the same as Blutto with a bad hangover vs Popeye without spinach.
Posted: 13 Sep 2006, 22:40
funny how everyone critised Vitali when it was rumored he was going to fight Maskaev, because Rahman is far better than him