No Muttley for Lauri
Posted: 12 Sep 2006, 07:23
you used to post interesting articles Bennie, but most of what you post now is either abuse or bitterness? can i just ask why, feel free to send me a private message if you don't want to put it on here.bennie wrote:Contrary to 'impartial' reports. BBN has become as bent as you and the websites you're plugging. It should be renamed either FrankMaloney.net or JonThaxton.net.
Incidentally, where was your editor (laugh) at Woods-Johnson? Doing it from TV no doubt. smeg amateurs.
Do you know how small, petty and poisonous posts like this make you sound?bennie wrote:Contrary to 'impartial' reports. BBN has become as bent as you and the websites you're plugging. It should be renamed either FrankMaloney.net or JonThaxton.net.
Incidentally, where was your editor (laugh) at Woods-Johnson? Doing it from TV no doubt. smeg amateurs.
I am just looking for Bennie to chanel his chi energy. Convert his ying to a yang, light a joss stick, listen to some pink floyd and just CHIILLLLL...Terence wrote:Channel your negative energy into a positive outcome.
I hear Feng Sui is very relaxing, I prefer Brut, although I'm not into aromatherapy per se.
I've already asked you to come up with evidence that BBN favours Maloney over other promoters...but you can't, can you?bennie wrote:Contrary to 'impartial' reports. BBN has become as bent as you and the websites you're plugging. It should be renamed either FrankMaloney.net or JonThaxton.net.
Incidentally, where was your editor (laugh) at Woods-Johnson? Doing it from TV no doubt. smeg amateurs.
Plus, I've just noticed the original story relates to a Matchroom bill!bennie wrote:Contrary to 'impartial' reports. BBN has become as bent as you and the websites you're plugging. It should be renamed either FrankMaloney.net or JonThaxton.net.
Incidentally, where was your editor (laugh) at Woods-Johnson? Doing it from TV no doubt. smeg amateurs.