Page 1 of 2

WHO ARE THE MOST EXCITING FIGHTERS YOU HAVE SEEN!!!??

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 16:19
by silkov
8) :roll: :box: :box: :box: ...heres my list, damn hard to do actually...
1. saad MUhammad ---
and--- Bobby Chacon tie.
2. Muhammad Ali
3. Roberto Duran
4. Ruben Olivares
5. Fighting Harada
6. Frank Fletcher
7. Kelvin Seabrooks
8. Danny Lopez
9. Wilfredo Gomez
10. Salvadore Sanchez
:box: :box: :box: :box: :box:

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 16:24
by kick asner
Corneleous "Boza" Edwards belongs in their somewhere. Also Marvin Johnson.

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 16:42
by TheRiverCityHippy
although the name sticks in my throat and i know this thread will be swamped with his nuthuggers any minute now i`d have to say tyson was pretty exciting when he first burst onto the scene.
you couldnt walk down the road in the mid 80`s without bumping into a staffordshire bull terrier named tyson.

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 17:58
by elmersalsa
headhunter wrote:although the name sticks in my throat and i know this thread will be swamped with his nuthuggers any minute now i`d have to say tyson was pretty exciting when he first burst onto the scene.
you couldnt walk down the road in the mid 80`s without bumping into a staffordshire bull terrier named tyson.
I agree with you on that one. Hate him or love him, you got to see Tyson fight.

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 18:20
by Flump
Apart from those already mentioned I would throw in the following:

Thomas Hearns
Nigel Benn
Dwight Qawi
Troy Dorsey
Carl Thompson
Mickey Ward
Earnie Shavers
Lloyd Honeyghan
Juan Roldan
Edwin Rosario

And a load of others I'm sure you guys can come up with...

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 18:22
by silkov
elmersalsa wrote:
headhunter wrote:although the name sticks in my throat and i know this thread will be swamped with his nuthuggers any minute now i`d have to say tyson was pretty exciting when he first burst onto the scene.
you couldnt walk down the road in the mid 80`s without bumping into a staffordshire bull terrier named tyson.
I agree with you on that one. Hate him or love him, you got to see Tyson fight.
Yeah, up to a point he was exciting in the 80s but 90% of those fights were one sided mismatches!... I'm thinking more along the lines of fighters who were in a lot of exciting competitive fights!...

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 18:23
by silkov
kick asner wrote:Corneleous "Boza" Edwards belongs in their somewhere. Also Marvin Johnson.
I agree, whatever 10 I choose theres another 10 that deserve mention... but hell, its Monday and I'm tired!... 8) :roll: :box:

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 20:13
by BoxBuzz
Hamed was exciting if for no other reason than you were just waiting for someone to settle his hash....which is just what Barrera did. One defeat and the guy implodes....amazing for a guy who talked it up so much.

Foreman was a guy everybody wanted to see and got everyone's attention because he was made out to be indestructable.

Granted these two examples were as much media made as self made to some degree.

Danny Lopez, Wilfredo Gomez, Aaron Pryor...(surprised?) the word here was exciting not competent. and I give Aaron credit for getting people's attention. Duran, Hearns,. I recall people getting pretty cranked to see every one of Cleveland Williams fights because he was going to give it his best everytime.

Monzon, Hagler,Qawi,Marvin Johnson, Saad Muhammad, Victor Galindez, I think all those names got attention.

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 20:44
by DoubleM
Carmen Basilio.

Posted: 25 Sep 2006, 22:20
by generic screen name
Evander Holyfield is a good one too. He had the whole offensive aresenal and was a bit eager to trade punches w/anyone.

Exciting Holyfield fights:
vs Qawi, 1986
vs Cooper, 1991
vs Bowe, 1992, 1993, 1995
vs Tyson, 1997 (I)

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 01:49
by Collins2000
Charlie Magri

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 01:50
by DonCorleone
BoxBuzz wrote:Hamed was exciting if for no other reason than you were just waiting for someone to settle his hash....
No. If this logic held, John Ruiz would be the MAN. Hamed was exciting because he took chances to do spectacular looking things.

re

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 02:57
by barry
Danny Lopez
Rubeen Olivares
Boby Chacon
Cornelius Boza-Edwards
Bob Satterfield
Tony Galento
Terry McGovern
Jack Dempsey
Henry Armstrong
Thomas Hearns
Arturo Gatti
Marvin Johnson
Mike Tyson
early holyfield
Tommy Morrison
Julian Jackson
Tony Canzoneri
Wilfredo Gomez
etc..etc..

A lot of people have only seen the boring heavyweight Michael Moorer, who only showed glimpses of excitement against Stewart and Cooper...the light heavyweight Michael Moorer was a fuking killer in the ring and certainly exciting...good call on that Dec!

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 03:34
by john2345
In no particular order after the first four...

Thomas Hearns
Arturo Gatti
Nigel Benn
Mike Tyson
Roberto Duran
Tony Sibson
Manny Pacquaio
Kirkland Laing (when on form)

J

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 05:09
by Ezzard
Hearns
Jackson
Benn

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 05:41
by Tantum
Bert Cooper

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 05:41
by DoubleM
I hate to repeat myself, but the answer is Carmen Basilio.

He was involved in the Fight of the Year in '55, '56, '57, '58 and '59. And that's without the inclusion of other exciting battles such as the Pender and Langlois fights.

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 05:45
by Tantum
I don't disagree, I was just adding to the list. :wink:

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 05:59
by silkov
BoxBuzz wrote:Hamed was exciting if for no other reason than you were just waiting for someone to settle his hash....which is just what Barrera did. One defeat and the guy implodes....amazing for a guy who talked it up so much.

Foreman was a guy everybody wanted to see and got everyone's attention because he was made out to be indestructable.

Granted these two examples were as much media made as self made to some degree.

Danny Lopez, Wilfredo Gomez, Aaron Pryor...(surprised?) the word here was exciting not competent. and I give Aaron credit for getting people's attention. Duran, Hearns,. I recall people getting pretty cranked to see every one of Cleveland Williams fights because he was going to give it his best everytime.

Monzon, Hagler,Qawi,Marvin Johnson, Saad Muhammad, Victor Galindez, I think all those names got attention.
Geez! Buzz!! I must take umbrage at you for casting doubt about whether the Hawk was 'competent'............ :o :o :o.... he was an excellent fighter!... if he hadnt been competent I dont see him beating a still dangerous Alexis Arguello two times... plus some other very decent fighters!... :x :box: :box: :box: :box:

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 06:02
by silkov
Some more for you all...

Kid GAVILAN
Ray Robinson
Ruben Carter
Bennie Briscoe
Carlos Monzon
Alexis Arguello
Bazooka Limon
Gerrie Coetzee
Iran Barkley
:box: :box: :box:

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 06:08
by Ezzard
DoubleM wrote:I hate to repeat myself, but the answer is Carmen Basilio.

He was involved in the Fight of the Year in '55, '56, '57, '58 and '59. And that's without the inclusion of other exciting battles such as the Pender and Langlois fights.

I don't know... The Ring fell in love with Basillio back then. Also, Basillio was very durable and not a clean KO puncher. His fights were very exciting but I like the thrill of knowing that a fight with a Julian Jackson can be over in the blink of an eye one way or another.

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 06:22
by BoxBuzz
silkov wrote:
BoxBuzz wrote:Hamed was exciting if for no other reason than you were just waiting for someone to settle his hash....which is just what Barrera did. One defeat and the guy implodes....amazing for a guy who talked it up so much.

Foreman was a guy everybody wanted to see and got everyone's attention because he was made out to be indestructable.

Granted these two examples were as much media made as self made to some degree.

Danny Lopez, Wilfredo Gomez, Aaron Pryor...(surprised?) the word here was exciting not competent. and I give Aaron credit for getting people's attention. Duran, Hearns,. I recall people getting pretty cranked to see every one of Cleveland Williams fights because he was going to give it his best everytime.

Monzon, Hagler,Qawi,Marvin Johnson, Saad Muhammad, Victor Galindez, I think all those names got attention.
Geez! Buzz!! I must take umbrage at you for casting doubt about whether the Hawk was 'competent'............ :o :o :o.... he was an excellent fighter!... if he hadnt been competent I dont see him beating a still dangerous Alexis Arguello two times... plus some other very decent fighters!... :x :box: :box: :box: :box:
Silkov, we both agree he was very good, it's always been a matter of degree's between my enthusiasm and others on this site. I just don't think he was quite all some imagine him to be. When his name starts getting bantered about with Robinson, Armstrong, Bennie Leonard, Duran and the "best of the best" I simply disagree.

So the "competent" barb should simply being taken in context.....He was competent.....there...now I've said two nice things about Aaron in the same thread. A record that should stand for quite some time.

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 07:32
by The Great John L
Boza-Edwards
Saad Muhammed
Chacon
Frank Fletcher

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 12:24
by Tantum
Barry meant that those were indeed exciting bouts... But those were about the only exciting heavyweight bouts he was in.

re

Posted: 26 Sep 2006, 13:42
by barry
>>>I don't know how you can say that Moorer-Cooper was only a "glimpse" of being exciting. That was one of the best heavyweight bouts of the decade<<<

Jesus...do I need to draw everything out in pictures for you?

--who only showed glimpses of excitement against Stewart and Cooper--

Cooper and Stewart were the only exciting fights that he had at heavyweight...hence the statement!!!!