BoxRec

You decide.

Cheers,
P

Is this yet another typical anti Calzaghe thread from Pundit?

You decide.

Cheers,
M

Is Pundit Kessler's best ball licker in years?

You decide.

Cheers
M

Imagine this:

Beyer beats Kessler.

Already Bika looks better, as he was going to beat Beyer last May.

Calzaghe beats a better than expected Bika, in a close, exciting fight.

Bika=better than Kessler

Pundit you are clearly a moron. I'm no Calzaghe fan but your witch hunt is pathetic.

nickd wrote:Pundit you are clearly a moron. I'm no Calzaghe fan but your witch hunt is pathetic.

Only radical truthtellling can help against the nuthugging-blindness epidemic, caused by the FWarrren virus, that holds this forum in its grip.

Thought this one should get a second hearing.

Cheers,
P

no but he was better than most expected. Joe won but did not look that good i favour kessler over the joe of tonight.

0ttke was poor imo joe would have stopped him easily imo.

He's certainly up there among his best victories IMO, anyone who had seen him before would have agreed he was no jimenez or salem. Its too bad for calzaghe that smw is a lot stronger division now than when he was in his physical prime...

No, he was just not a slow, hook-based fighter.

If Calzaghe wants to look good, he should take on Markussen, Briggs or Dave Green.

Of course if he thinks he can beat a great for real fighter, then he should take on Kessler.

Deram wrote:No, he was just not a slow, hook-based fighter.

If Calzaghe wants to look good, he should take on Markussen, Briggs or Dave Green.

Of course if he thinks he can beat a great for real fighter, then he should take on Kessler.

Makussen?! current affairs would suggest otherwise....Actually it was bikas straight right which was most damaging...he needs to fight kessler but andrade might be a better match...