Page 1 of 1
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:14
by silkov
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:20
by Expug
Tate won the vacant version I thought from Coetzee.
A few years later Coetzee beat Dokes for one of the alphabet titles no?
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:37
by silkov
expug wrote:Tate won the vacant version I thought from Coetzee.
A few years later Coetzee beat Dokes for one of the alphabet titles no?
Yeh, thats right, Coetzee fought Weaver for the title as well... but his fight with Tate was for the vacant title...
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 18:48
by DoubleM
Who cares?
Posted: 20 Oct 2006, 19:18
by silkov
Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not???
8)
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 01:36
by Parm
silkov wrote:Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not???
8)
portrayed mistakenly as well
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 04:55
by cosand
<<<<Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not??? >>>>>
Boy do you have a LOT of work to do !!!
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 06:42
by DoubleM
I meant who cares about this subject... I saw the thread and opened it immediately, hoping for an inside story on Willie Pep and his rare stamp collection or something.
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 07:42
by Flump
silkov wrote:expug wrote:Tate won the vacant version I thought from Coetzee.
A few years later Coetzee beat Dokes for one of the alphabet titles no?
Yeh, thats right,
Coetzee fought Weaver for the title as well... but his fight with Tate was for the vacant title...
Co-incidently I just watched this fight,not much finesse but an exciting brawl. I could never figure how in some fights Weaver could take such a good shot, then in others he'd fall over as soon as he got clocked.
He was certainly an interesting fighter though, one of my favourite Heavyweights of the late 70's/80's
Posted: 21 Oct 2006, 08:51
by silkov
cosand wrote:<<<<Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not??? >>>>>
Boy do you have a LOT of work to do !!!
Not as much as you dimbo!...
Posted: 22 Oct 2006, 01:59
by torodecayey
silkov wrote:cosand wrote:<<<<Who cares about what?.... that its 27 years or that it was for the vacant title and not Coetzees title???...
as a reference site for all fans of the manly art surely it is our duty to defend the facts when they are being protrayed mistakenly???>>>... is it is it not??? >>>>>
Boy do you have a LOT of work to do !!!
Not as much as you dimbo!...
i think he means youre undertaking one heck of a task...