Page 1 of 1

Which would you rather be?

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 09:13
by kick asner
Would you rather be the greatest Cruiserweight of all time, say that you beat all of the top contenders in that division and had a long and illusterous career but that was the only weight class you ever fought in. Or would you rather be a heaveyweight champion who was never really considered great? Say someone like a Michael Moorer or a Cris Byrd. Guys who were known as much for their shortcomings as they were for their accomplishments but still had the presteige of being a heaveyweight champion, just not a great one.

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 09:26
by Heartbreak_Kid79
Why not ask Evander Holyfield? :lol:

Posted: 16 Nov 2006, 10:15
by Ezzard
If he could haveheld the lineal HW title (even for just one fight) then I'd go for that. Otherwise I'd go for the Cruiser option.