BoxRec

Imagine this scenario. Two all-time great boxers of the same approximate age and weight class never competed against each other in their primes. Then, just out of curiousity, they are matched when they are both in their 50s. How much significance does the match carry regarding their respective legacies as long as they are both the best they can be considering their age (in other words they have both kept themselves up well)?

For example, would you pay to watch a modern day Joe Frazier vs. a modern day Ken Norton and would the match have any significance regarding their respective legacies?

No and No.

Another no and no

OH NO!!!

Yes ( I'm only human and in Holland you can't afford to miss any fight ) and No.

OH! SAY IT AINT SO WOUTER!!!.....but while we're at it how about Holmes vs Foreman now???....better match I'D say.... both are better preserved than Norton and Frazier.........it could happen!!!.

As long as each of them passes his medicals I really don't see a problem.

How about Harry Carpenter vs Reg Gutteridge...... BATTLE OF THE RETIRED BOXING COMMENTATORS!!!!..........I BET IT WOULD SELL!!!.

If they want to fight, let them do it. Wouldn't pay for that one though.