Page 1 of 1

Who Should Amir Khan Fight ???

Posted: 06 Mar 2007, 16:49
by sweetscience
90% of the posts on here critise Amirs opponents, so who do you think he should fight, and be realistic, he aint going to get put in with the worlds number #1

Steffy Bull i think has Ryan Barrett wrote all over it. Still a good match for someone 11-0 thou !

However i think his next bout should have been against a lightwelter who will give him rounds and obviously at a low risk, someone like the french guy he fought a few bouts ago,

Then, Defo Willie Limmond, winable and for a title

remember he aint 21 so they is zero point fighting Thaxton

Posted: 06 Mar 2007, 16:54
by emma
I think someone like John Fewkes or Nigel Wright.

Posted: 06 Mar 2007, 17:00
by sweetscience
i too think john fewkes

however..................

a million posts of 'he cant punch' would follow

Posted: 06 Mar 2007, 17:02
by emma
sweetscience wrote:i too think john fewkes

however..................

a million posts of 'he cant punch' would follow
Yes he's only KO'd two of his opponents.

Posted: 06 Mar 2007, 19:47
by tonyevs
How about Damian Owen....similar age...and he`ll definetly come to fight :D

If Khan is as good as the hype that surrounds him then this would be a terrific match-up that would prove something :TU:

Posted: 06 Mar 2007, 20:14
by stujones
He might not be a Light Welter, but he gives a good account of himself and has a rock solid chin.

http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=031241

Maybe thats a little bit on the over cautious side.

An ambitious but I think winnable fight for Khan is against this guy.

http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=14651

Posted: 06 Mar 2007, 23:10
by Neri

Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 04:08
by Autobarn
Khan should be fighting ppl who are a 1/2 level below Meager, or if ambitious a full level below Thaxton. Dave Stewart, Danny Hunt otherwise it just isn't worth wathcing.

Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 04:59
by Daveyswan
Ye I think Damian Owen would be a good shout - He fought at Lightweight the weekend but see he's a light welter which suprised me as he looked small but strong

Daveyswan

Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 07:06
by Top Dog
Anyone with a heart beat, a pair of balls, can take a punch, who has a half decent punch, unlike all of his last opponents who had none of these attributes. Give him a genuine test with a guy who is hungry. Maybe someone like Martin Watson, or Reid :TU:

Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 07:18
by Autobarn
Come on Frank, let's see things done the HONEST WAY, let's have some fights.

There is a huge discrepency in what the papers print ("THAT EXTRAORDINARY BOY" and all the gushy rest) and what serious boxing fans believe ("HAVE A F UCKING FIGHT!").

Casual fans know what they are seeing. In my experience it's the Earl-Katsidis and Woods-Johnson 3 fights that they respond well to.

It's routine for Khan to have blowouts. If we're lucky we get a spoiler.

Get him ready for Thaxton and when that happens it's main event material! Thaxton's title/ability and Khan's Olympic name would make it big.

Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 07:24
by stujones
Daveyswan wrote:Ye I think Damian Owen would be a good shout - He fought at Lightweight the weekend but see he's a light welter which suprised me as he looked small but strong

Daveyswan
I would like to see Owen grow as a prospect - perhaps I am a tad bias cause I've thought of Dean quite highly but I was very impressed with his showing. He's had an early set back, but no-one seems to know if that was a home town decision.

I think Owen can progress to British title level (at least) and I don't want a Khan fight to ruin one of our two best prospects. On the showing vs Dean, Owen vs Khan is a tough one to call. I would actually tip Owen over Limond if he can reproduce that form.

Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 07:37
by overhand_right
Daniel Seda.

A fighter who would "fight for the world title tomorrow" if he could and has been pro for nearly 2 years should be fighting & beating Seda.

Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 08:01
by lurkyshaka
stujones wrote: An ambitious but I think winnable fight for Khan is against this guy.

http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=14651
Yeah, Lauri would be a good opponent at this point. He's been in with some good fighters, he's a 140 fighter so nobody could criticise Khan for picking on smaller men in this one, but Lauri isn't a puncher and so he's a 'safe' opponent. It'd be a good measuring stick type fight for Khan.

The only problem that i can see would be Warren being concerned that Khan might not look as dominant over Lauri as Hatton and Witter did and thus his stock might lower a bit. I can't see Warren going for this one for that reason.

Posted: 07 Mar 2007, 09:55
by sweetscience
Top Dog wrote:Anyone with a heart beat, a pair of balls, can take a punch, who has a half decent punch, unlike all of his last opponents who had none of these attributes. Give him a genuine test with a guy who is hungry. Maybe someone like Martin Watson, or Reid :TU:
martin watson went the distance with an under prepared ryan barrett, who in turn got wiped out by Khan in a minute

Posted: 08 Mar 2007, 11:04
by Autobarn
lurkyshaka wrote:
stujones wrote: An ambitious but I think winnable fight for Khan is against this guy.

http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=14651
Yeah, Lauri would be a good opponent at this point. He's been in with some good fighters, he's a 140 fighter so nobody could criticise Khan for picking on smaller men in this one, but Lauri isn't a puncher and so he's a 'safe' opponent. It'd be a good measuring stick type fight for Khan.

The only problem that i can see would be Warren being concerned that Khan might not look as dominant over Lauri as Hatton and Witter did and thus his stock might lower a bit. I can't see Warren going for this one for that reason.
Seems like Lauri would be good. Lauri does fold faced with soe speed & power i.e. Witter.

Posted: 08 Mar 2007, 13:17
by dbf
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=006527

victor hugo paz. been in with a few names. south american. Not much of a puncher.[/url]

Posted: 08 Mar 2007, 13:22
by jamesmcdonnell
dbf wrote:http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=006527

victor hugo paz. been in with a few names. south american. Not much of a puncher.[/url]
Not a bad call, very experienced, doesn't get stopped, good workout for Khan provided the ref didn't jump in there as soon as he starts flurrying.

weird, up until 1995, he had a really good record, and then since then, went into journeyman mode, losing more than he is winning, wonder what happened?

Posted: 09 Mar 2007, 11:40
by black panther
I think a few fights down the line(maybe for his 16/17th?) fight he should fight stefano zoff - past his best, a non-puncher but bags of experience still durable and a former world(WBA) and european champ to boot. He would definitely tell us a thing or two about where khan can go.

Posted: 09 Mar 2007, 12:27
by JC
At this stage I'm not too bothered about his opponents' win/loss record as long as they can give him something new to deal with/figure out.

Posted: 09 Mar 2007, 14:30
by Autobarn
How about a Daniel Thorpe rematch?

I think I read about Steffy Bull in the local rag. Didn't he lose in his attempt for the English title at the Dome & consider hanging 'em up?