Page 1 of 1

The grim reality of the April 7th betting odds

Posted: 26 Mar 2007, 19:01
by deadpan
http://www.oddschecker.com/other-sports/boxing


Have a gander at the odds for the Calzaghe bill.

They've got 'pick em' going through them like a stick of Sports Network rock.

Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 05:31
by Twinkle Toes
I've brought this point up already - It's a shocking card, and 'frankly speaking' it's deplorable.

Quite funny considering a certain SN peon has been on here qouting heresay about a certain Ray Hatton taking the general public for mugs.

Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 05:50
by dr_devious
It is a card full of hopeless mismatches, the only decent match up is Jennings v Takaloo

Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 07:59
by Ally-M1
Hopefully my local Ladbrokes will have odds available for Takaloo vs Jennings..!

Only potential fight worth a decent bet on, given Calzaghe and the rest of the bouts would offer terrible betting sense for the average punter.

Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 08:00
by Max Molyneux
Peter Manfredo Jr (805/67)
:lol:

Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 08:01
by JC
I think 11/10 on under 7.5 rounds is not a bad one to have as part of an accy. Always dodgy betting on Calzaghe KOs though, due to the hand problems.

Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 08:13
by Hagler2002
Well my money is going on Calzaghe by points @ 7/2.....I don't know why there is all this shit surrounding the fight that Joe is going to batter Manfredo and stop him.

1. Manfredo has never been stopped

2. Calzaghe has stopped one opponent in 3 yrs

3. Salem, Ashira & Bika all went the distance so why can't Manfredo?

Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 11:05
by JC
Hagler2k7 wrote:Well my money is going on Calzaghe by points @ 7/2.....I don't know why there is all this shit surrounding the fight that Joe is going to batter Manfredo and stop him.

1. Manfredo has never been stopped

2. Calzaghe has stopped one opponent in 3 yrs

3. Salem, Ashira & Bika all went the distance so why can't Manfredo?
7/2 is pretty tempting. I would urge a bit of caution on the comparason to past opponents though. Salem and Bika are both tough bastards and Salem in particular had gone the distance with some decent SMW fighters before fighting Calzaghe, I still consdier Manfredo's chin to be pretty untested at 168. As for Ashira it's another fight were Joe claims he broke his hand half way through and boxed for a points win. Whether he did or not I don't know but he did seem to be in some discomfort.

I do agree that 7/2 is decent odds though.

Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 05:03
by Hagler2002
I'm not looking to go in large on a points win JC, I just think it is the value in what is a poor fight in regards of betting.

Im also going to have a few quid on Macca to spank that mug in rnd 1/rnd 2

Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 05:07
by Twinkle Toes
Yeah a Macca stoppage in the first couple of rounds has to be worth a punt.

Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 07:22
by Hagler2002
Macca is 4/1 for the 1st and the same for the 2nd :box:

I can't wait to see how ITV are going to try and sell this bloke as a worthy challenger :TU:

Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 07:31
by Autobarn
What are the odd on Gunn landing a punch?

Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 08:00
by jamesmcdonnell
Hagler2k7 wrote:Macca is 4/1 for the 1st and the same for the 2nd :box:

I can't wait to see how ITV are going to try and sell this bloke as a worthy challenger :TU:
That just shows what a mistmatch this is that the odds are so low.

Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 09:15
by Lenny
Have got money on Enzo scoring a first round KO at 7/1 and a smaller amount on a 2nd round stoppage. Was worried about Enzo carrying him for a bit but having seen Gunn and hear him speak I think he may try and rush him McNeeley style and end up getting smashed

Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 09:20
by stujones
Yes, isn't a great bill and I was a little surprised at how BM were hyping it as an impressive bill.

You could add Pryce's commonwealth title fight in the same bracket as an on paper mis match.

Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 09:28
by stujones
BTW, some interesting odds there.

I did expect to see Corrales open as a slight favourite vs Clottey - he's not, I think thats a little tempting.

Jermain Taylor hasn't really been an impressive champion thus far, I think I give Spinks a better chance than Ouma - so the 11/2 odds isn't bad.

I think Branco should be the favourite over Drews - so good odds here for Silivno 58/19. Decent odds for Castillejo to repeat his quite brutal success over Sturm. I do think Sturm will get revenge, but wouldn't lay any money on it.

Frietais at 11/4 vs the Baby Bull is a bit tempting, although I do favour Diaz.

Who knows how much Vitali has left at his age and with his injury problems. I think the odds for Maskaev are a little tempting.


I'd make Hopkins the favourite vs Wright so even odds are tempting for the Executioner.

I would say that even at 3/10 on, that is tempting to put your money on Hill. He beat Maske at a canter last time and with 10 years of inactivity I cannot see how Hill will do any different. Although, he might need a KO.

Posted: 29 Mar 2007, 09:22
by E
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Hagler2k7 wrote:Macca is 4/1 for the 1st and the same for the 2nd :box:

I can't wait to see how ITV are going to try and sell this bloke as a worthy challenger :TU:
That just shows what a mistmatch this is that the odds are so low.
It was 8/1 for a couple of days (laid only a tenner stupidly!) but after a post here and assuumingly loads of bets of round 1 and 2, the odds halved...

Posted: 30 Mar 2007, 07:51
by Chesney_Chambers
The Calzaghe-Manfredo and Enzo-Gunn fights annoy the shit out of me, April 7th has to be the most one-sided World championship bill in the history of boxing :evil: :evil:

Enzo-Haye almost gets made (until Warren insists on options and the right to bone Hayes immediate family), but what replacement do we get to replace this British superfight.....Bobby Gunn whos biggest win was against Shannon Landberg, who got sparked by a 49 year old in his previous fight (admittedly it was Thomas Hitman Hearns).

Kessler and Froch especially have been calling out Calzaghe, either fight would be awesome, but Calzaghes fighting Manfredo instead.

These 2 fights symbolise everything that is wrong with the sport, any non-casual fan who is going to this bill needs to take a long hard look at themselves :-?

Posted: 30 Mar 2007, 08:47
by thespy
Gary Lockett opponent is a former sparring partner who didn't last a day...

Posted: 30 Mar 2007, 13:35
by Hagler2002
Chesney_Chambers wrote:Enzo-Haye almost gets made (until Warren insists on options and the right to bone Hayes immediate family)
You have done it now, expect a letter and a pending lawsuit, you will be homeless and skint within a month :TU:

Posted: 30 Mar 2007, 13:58
by jamesmcdonnell
Hagler2k7 wrote:
Chesney_Chambers wrote:Enzo-Haye almost gets made (until Warren insists on options and the right to bone Hayes immediate family)
You have done it now, expect a letter and a pending lawsuit, you will be homeless and skint within a month :TU:
I can see the climb down now...

"Boxrec wishes to point out, that clearly the comments made painted Mr Warren to be expecting to acquire the rights to sleep with members of Mr Haye's direct family, on signing of a contract to fight Mr Enzo Macaranelli, were quite baseless, and the furthermore, This would insinutate, quite wrongly, that Mr Warren wished to sleep with the said sister and mother of Mr Haye, or that indeed, Mr Warren wished to contract their the rights to their services for sexual liaison with himself or other members of his organisation, or other individuals which is quite untrue."

Posted: 30 Mar 2007, 14:32
by Autobarn
Isn't Haye too busy boning Kylie to care??

Posted: 30 Mar 2007, 15:47
by MightyWarrior
Final Fight wrote:Isn't Haye too busy boning Kylie to care??
Is it true Kylie knocked him cold with a stray shot to the temple, during the throws of passion?