Page 1 of 1
Thaxton v John Murray
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 08:53
by sweetscience
i dont think there has been much chat about these two squaring off
Murray has been a pro for quite alot longer than Khan, and has had more bouts etc
whats your thoughts ?
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 09:03
by Max Molyneux
Thaxton by KO.
Murray Is too easy to hit for a domestic veteran like Thaxton.
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 11:07
by stujones
Yeah, I think Thaxton - although with Jon he is a bit of a timebomb the way he cuts up these days.
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 11:43
by Mukel
Do you think Murray has the potential to develop into a fighter to beat the likes of thaxton?
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 12:32
by kevo
Maybe a bit further down the line, but not right now. Too easy to hit, and doesn't hit particularly hard.
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 12:44
by steve689
Who is next in line for Thaxton incidentially?
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 14:05
by Wales
Dont know, but Thaxton Earl would be entertaining
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 14:49
by glahn
This will be a good fight, I think. I take Murray to just edge it.
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 14:58
by steve689
I would favour Thaxton over Murray and strongly favour him over Earl. Am i the only one who thought Earl sounded punchy BEFORE he fought Katsidis?
Posted: 27 Mar 2007, 19:11
by tonyevs
Murray is new to the weight and along way from the likes of Thaxton.
Like lots here I think the situation with Khan is just plain silly, he has been built into a prospect before he has really shown anything as a pro, Murray has shown more but still not enough to really put him in the bracket of future champion.
Thaxton destroys either one...quite easilly also
Posted: 28 Mar 2007, 04:00
by sweetscience
he has always been a lightweight he just always claimed to be a super feather but in reality he could never make it
he boxed in the aba's at lightweight about 4 years ago