Page 1 of 2
Rumour has it...
Posted: 27 Jun 2007, 22:32
by STP
Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP
The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable
Posted: 27 Jun 2007, 23:34
by STP
Baffling because here Ray Hatton says they'll sign the Mayweather fight contract this week:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/avdb/sport/ ... _au_bb.asx
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 03:26
by Autobarn
M'Baye - a one off with Warren? Was convinced thought that Frank was keeping that title warm for Khan.
Then Mosley? Interesting, I'll give it that.
Well structured move, because i.e. take on 2ndary league title holder and then an A-lister.
Mosley could be tough for Hatton. Shane has class and power. But he lacks speed and zest now and IS an old guy...
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 04:28
by Shirow
Autobarn wrote:Shane has class and power. But he lacks speed and zest now and IS an old guy...
Did you see Mosley's fight with Collazo? He looked rejuvenated
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 04:40
by Chambers2
I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
Re: Rumour has it...
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 04:43
by boxingchat
STP wrote:Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP
The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable
Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember, Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.
You original source is wrong and therefore not reliable.
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 04:46
by boxingchat
Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
Don't worry your ass is safe!
Re: Rumour has it...
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 04:55
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
STP wrote:Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP
The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable
Whats the source? Our resident SN insider has called it BS and these fights make little sense financially
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 04:56
by Chambers2
boxingchat wrote:Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
Don't worry your ass is safe!
Damn!!!

Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 04:58
by Autobarn
Shirow wrote:Autobarn wrote:Shane has class and power. But he lacks speed and zest now and IS an old guy...
Did you see Mosley's fight with Collazo? He looked rejuvenated
I don't think he was rejuvenated. Just a good ring general. He used movement against a man with no movement.
Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember, Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.
If Hatton's not a world champion then no SN fighters are world champions. Because it's habitual to pick up a belt without even beating a world class opponent. Macca isn't a world champion. Arthur definitely won't be - whether he gets half of a WBO or full - because is he even going to go near Pac, Soto or Marquez? Hatton beat Tszyu, and so it doesn't matter which title he holds - he's still the champion.
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 05:33
by fried bread
Why not a non-title affair? Ricky would beat MBaye, vacate the belt anyway. Champion vs title holder, it could still easily be marketed.
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 05:48
by Chambers2
Am I missing something, why would Ricky even entertain the idea of giving a allegedly fighter a shot at the BIG time????
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 06:27
by Wales
MEN? And a nice big wedge of cash. There is obviously a lot of promotion behnd a huge super event, perhaps they dont feel any other promoter in the UK can pull off a millenium stadium sized show?
Who knows. Boxings a funny business.
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 06:32
by Greg Nicholas
He surely wont fight M'Baye (Warren would want to stage a Hatton-PBF or Hatton-DLH at Wembley or some shit out of spite for Benn and Eubank), but i do know for a fact that Hatton wants to fight in Oct because they feel the long layoffs before the Collazo and Urango debacles did him no favours..
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 06:35
by Roars Like Me
Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
I'm scared for you
It sounds likely as Warren dropped his libel in a heartbeat as long as Ray links up with him for a fight or two.
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 06:54
by Wales
Greg Nicholas wrote:He surely wont fight M'Baye (Warren would want to stage a Hatton-PBF or Hatton-DLH at Wembley or some shit out of spite for Benn and Eubank), but i do know for a fact that Hatton wants to fight in Oct because they feel the long layoffs before the Collazo and Urango debacles did him no favours..
Warren has always said keeping Hatton busy was a huge priority due to the weight issues etc... Im sure the NOTW column will be full of praise on Sunday.
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 07:10
by Autobarn
The thing is, is M'Baye any lesser than Malignaggi? I'd say they're about equal. Paulie brings trash talking and a New York following. M'Baye can be done at the MEN. Two big stages there.
As B/C says, Kotelnik is the obstacle. M'Baye never has it easy with this guy who won't go away. I won't moan about the decisions, but you can make a case for Kotelnik winning one of those fights, at least.
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 07:38
by twenty six
.................... STP talks bollocks.
Re: Rumour has it...
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 17:30
by Flump
boxingchat wrote:STP wrote:Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP
The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable
Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember,
Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.
You original source is wrong and therefore not reliable.
Hatton is the real champ at Light Welter, I don't think many people would argue with that, unless they had an agenda.
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 17:41
by rhino222
Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
what...again?
Posted: 28 Jun 2007, 21:06
by stujones
Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
It wouldn't make any sense to me either, but then again neither did the Urango fight.
Re: Rumour has it...
Posted: 29 Jun 2007, 12:27
by boxingchat
Flump wrote:boxingchat wrote:STP wrote:Ricky will be fighting M'Baye and Mosley in his next two fights and is in talks with GBP
The apparent original source is, or should be, reliable
Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember,
Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.
You original source is wrong and therefore not reliable.
Hatton is the real champ at Light Welter, I don't think many people would argue with that, unless they had an agenda.
I'm not arguing with you but the WBC, IBF, WBA and IBF only recognise each other and not the others. If this were not the case why did the WBC
allow their International belt last Saturday. Fact is, Hatton MAY be the best 10 stoner in the world (Not even in the north of England in my eyes) but the facts are the facts, he is not a World Champion, belt wise at least.
Maccarinelli is the WBO Champion so is a World Champion "Recognised"
WBU and IBO are not in the same league and that tihnk is universally accepted. In fact, the IBO splinter from the WBU so why Hatton even has it, wants it or needs it is beyond me.
Posted: 29 Jun 2007, 12:28
by boxingchat
rhino222 wrote:Chambers2 wrote:I'll pull an 8 hour moonie down Manchesters Canal Street with 'Insert Here' tattooed on my arse if he fights M'Baye next....it just doesn't make any sense IMO
what...again?
You get the impression he wants his arse filled!

Re: Rumour has it...
Posted: 29 Jun 2007, 12:44
by jomothepure
boxingchat wrote:Flump wrote:boxingchat wrote:
Absolute and utter BS. M'Baye has to fight Kotelnik after Rees. Also, remember, Hatton is not a World Champion (IBO doesn't count) so the unification rule cannot apply.
You original source is wrong and therefore not reliable.
Hatton is the real champ at Light Welter, I don't think many people would argue with that, unless they had an agenda.
I'm not arguing with you but the WBC, IBF, WBA and IBF only recognise each other and not the others. If this were not the case why did the WBC
allow their International belt last Saturday. Fact is, Hatton MAY be the best 10 stoner in the world (Not even in the north of England in my eyes) but the facts are the facts, he is not a World Champion, belt wise at least.
Maccarinelli is the WBO Champion so is a World Champion "Recognised"
WBU and IBO are not in the same league and that tihnk is universally accepted. In fact, the IBO splinter from the WBU so why Hatton even has it, wants it or needs it is beyond me.
Do you know how and why? I thought the IBO were formed first, or at any rate were sanctioning fights before the WBU, although admittedly that's different from which was formed first.
Posted: 29 Jun 2007, 13:48
by hitman_hatton1
the only reason hatton never had one of the major belts is cos they went and stripped him.
the belts cheapen thereselves when they do that.
and look how awful n'dou looked last week.