Page 1 of 1

Clinton Woods? Who will be his next fight?

Posted: 29 Jun 2007, 23:44
by leforge
I know he was due ti fight gonzalez again but who do you think he will fight.

Posted: 30 Jun 2007, 02:14
by m1kee50
gozalez and G Johnson are both IBF mandatories so one of them or vacate

Posted: 02 Jul 2007, 01:42
by miamiboxing
johnson

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 05:44
by DavidPayne
I've been told Johnson is taking another path.

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 06:06
by jamesmcdonnell
God the light heavyweight division is boring. Same old bloody names just keep rolling around.

It's time some of the young guns in the division were given their shot.

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 06:10
by Wales
CHad Dawson looks the business though, he has the potential to clear up... 24 isnt he? Mullered Adamek didnt he, although im yet to see the fight myself.

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 06:11
by Twinkle Toes
I guess it will be Gonzales - Is anyone actually interested in watching that fight again?

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 06:38
by rhino222
im not really interested in seeing clinton fight anyone he has already met, its all getting a bit boring to be honest, johnson, delisle, gonzales..

what the fornicate...get someone new over here to fight.

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 06:48
by jamesmcdonnell
Twinkle Toes wrote:I guess it will be Gonzales - Is anyone actually interested in watching that fight again?
Not me.

Christ, can't they get Clinton someone he hasn't already fought already!

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 09:04
by rhino222
they cant afford it cos hatton has got all of the money !! :TU:

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 15:15
by josh fg
It does appear woods's carrer is on a bit of a hiatus because of his promoters other interests, since winning that title he has done very little. I would like to see him have some fights to make himself a little money he is a nice bloke and come up the hard way.

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 15:28
by Captain Hook
He deserves a payday and I'd like to see him fight Tarver, I think he'd outwork him..

sure Tarver is a better boxer - in spurts - but i think Clinton could beat him...

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 17:36
by rhino222
Captain Hook wrote:He deserves a payday and I'd like to see him fight Tarver, I think he'd outwork him..

sure Tarver is a better boxer - in spurts - but i think Clinton could beat him...
i do too and i think clinton deserves the pay day to perhaps end his career, tarver is now more of a name thanks to the balboa link, this could perhaps generate a bit more interest.

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 04:22
by Captain Hook
Exactly.

Tarver gets another shot at the title, Clinton gets an overrated, lazy twat as an opponent....

And publicity.....

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 04:42
by Wales
the amount of grief Calzaghe (and SN) were getting after Woods won the title too. Woods doesn't need Calzaghe, Woods has huge fights ahead of him etc... etc...
Granted, joe is still waiting for his big fight since Lacy, but Woods career has remained at an absolute stand still since his win over Johnson. Its even looking like going backwatrds!!

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 05:02
by Chambers2
Woods should be looking to line-up Chad Dawson IMO. He's the new kid on the block and it'd be a unification match-up, ideal support bout for PBF-RH, if Hobson is promoting it

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 05:24
by jamesmcdonnell
Wales wrote:the amount of grief Calzaghe (and SN) were getting after Woods won the title too. Woods doesn't need Calzaghe, Woods has huge fights ahead of him etc... etc...
Granted, joe is still waiting for his big fight since Lacy, but Woods career has remained at an absolute stand still since his win over Johnson. Its even looking like going backwatrds!!
Yes, with hindsight, it may have been a big mistake turning down a shot at Calzaghe, as Clinton cannot have had too many big paydays in his career.

They should try and get him over to fight Dawson, but who knows whether Dawson is keen or not, and unification fights are always difficult business to make happen, especially with Ricky commanding such big paydays these days.

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 06:13
by Autobarn
if he went to America and fought Dawson it'd be a bad idea. Dawson is 6' 4, lighting fast, a southpaw and has a wicked body attack. This is the nearest in quality to a prime RJJ you'll get at light heavy for the next maybe ten years. Sure Clinton is improved but Dawson appears to be too much.

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 06:48
by Dirk Kelly
Its shocking that Clinton has one of the 3 big belts but yet struggling to get fights, and then ends up fighting the same people over and over.

IMO as soon as Hatton signed Clinton has taken a back seat. You've got to admire his loyalty - he must see this but is sticking with Hobson.

Surely there is fights out there to be had - Briggs, Homes, Erdei, Drews, Ulrich, Green etc etc.

Perhaps a change of promoter is in order? Say what we like about Warren, will he not manage Clinton to at least 2 to 3 decent paydays?

Its a shame because I really like Clinton, done things the hard proper way, not alpabet titles. But now hes the IBF champion he's been put on the shelf. Talk about a title being a weight around your neck!

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 07:17
by Chambers2
Autobarn wrote:if he went to America and fought Dawson it'd be a bad idea. Dawson is 6' 4, lighting fast, a southpaw and has a wicked body attack. This is the nearest in quality to a prime RJJ you'll get at light heavy for the next maybe ten years. Sure Clinton is improved but Dawson appears to be too much.
You'd make a great promoter.......but a sh!t boxing fan :wink:

I want to see our top-level boxers in the best fights out there, especially the ones who are knocking on abit, I want them to target the best and to take risks

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 09:09
by mickeybeard
Autobarn wrote:if he went to America and fought Dawson it'd be a bad idea. Dawson is 6' 4, lighting fast, a southpaw and has a wicked body attack. This is the nearest in quality to a prime RJJ you'll get at light heavy for the next maybe ten years. Sure Clinton is improved but Dawson appears to be too much.
I've watched Dawson against Ruiz, Adamek and Harding. He's good, but not as good as you make out IMO. Then again, I remember you were very high on Adamek, so I suppose it makes sense you'd like the man who beat the man, so to speak. Dawson is fresher, and I'd probably lean towards him if he fought Woods, but in a fight in Sheffield with the crowd behind him, Clinton would have every chance.

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 11:18
by steve689
Woods V Gonalez 2, Johnson 4, DeLisle 3 Lol yaaaawnnnn

I would love to see Woods in with someone like Danny Green or Paul Briggs. Can't they pack him off to Germany to face Zsolt Erdei or even Thomas Ulrich...both winnable fights and would be solid paydays for Woods. Even stick him in with Montell Griffin or perhaps a tempter for Adamek to get him straight back in the driving seat of world class...or even Tarver!!

Anything but Johnson or Gonzalez again. What exactly has Gonzalez done to warrant another shot anyway?

Posted: 04 Jul 2007, 11:31
by Captain Hook
I bet they put him back in with Rico fornicating Hoye