"Fireman" Jim Flynn vs. Dan "Porky" Flyn
Posted: 05 Jul 2007, 18:01
I haven't posted here lately, but this is going to be a revival of some thread(s) I had created a few years back. Fighters with similar names who fought more or less at the same time and perhaps could have (or should have or would have) faced each other in the ring, however for whatever reason didn't. In other words, "Philadelphia" Jack O'Brien vs. Jack Root, Bob Foster vs. Mac Foster, Earnie Shavers vs. Ernie Terrell, Tony Tubbs vs. Tony Tucker and so on.
This time around, it's Dan "Porky" Flynn vs. "Fireman" Jim Flynn in a battle of Flynns. Of course, that's somewhat interesting in itself because Jim Flynn's original name was (apparently, I have heard variations) Andrew Chairiglione. Some mystery still surrounds him possibly because he fought so long ago, wikipedia calls him a "bare knuckle boxer" when that era had mostly passed (he could have supplemented his gloved bouts with bare knucks outside of the rings). The Fireman fought when it seems there were not many other Italian or Italian-American boxers of note, at least heavyweights. Porky Flynn on the other hand was indeed an Irish-American, born Daniel F. Flynn.
So, Fireman vs. Porky. Who wins? They had opponents in common, obviously, fighting in the early 1900's and more particularly the 1910's. Both lost early to Jack Dempsey, though Jim Flynn also had an early win against the "Manassa Mauler" (aside: I am aware of the controversy surrounding the first Dempsey-Flynn fight, maybe deserving of a thread in itself, my own opinion for what it's worth might differ from many others). Fireman Jim Flynn, like so many others, probably did not know when to call an end to his career...still in his day was considered a legitimate contender. Even in some of his later fights, during the 1920's, he remained competitive (a reported victory over Tiger Flowers, the joint Flowers-Harry Greb site says Flowers won, I am not sure whether or not Flynn had a great size differential over the middleweight Tiger). And it's this that I think would make the difference, Jim Flynn in a hard-fought 6 round KO over Dan Flynn. Unless, as was frequent in their time, a no-decision/newspaper decision/draw situation intervened.
Anthony
This time around, it's Dan "Porky" Flynn vs. "Fireman" Jim Flynn in a battle of Flynns. Of course, that's somewhat interesting in itself because Jim Flynn's original name was (apparently, I have heard variations) Andrew Chairiglione. Some mystery still surrounds him possibly because he fought so long ago, wikipedia calls him a "bare knuckle boxer" when that era had mostly passed (he could have supplemented his gloved bouts with bare knucks outside of the rings). The Fireman fought when it seems there were not many other Italian or Italian-American boxers of note, at least heavyweights. Porky Flynn on the other hand was indeed an Irish-American, born Daniel F. Flynn.
So, Fireman vs. Porky. Who wins? They had opponents in common, obviously, fighting in the early 1900's and more particularly the 1910's. Both lost early to Jack Dempsey, though Jim Flynn also had an early win against the "Manassa Mauler" (aside: I am aware of the controversy surrounding the first Dempsey-Flynn fight, maybe deserving of a thread in itself, my own opinion for what it's worth might differ from many others). Fireman Jim Flynn, like so many others, probably did not know when to call an end to his career...still in his day was considered a legitimate contender. Even in some of his later fights, during the 1920's, he remained competitive (a reported victory over Tiger Flowers, the joint Flowers-Harry Greb site says Flowers won, I am not sure whether or not Flynn had a great size differential over the middleweight Tiger). And it's this that I think would make the difference, Jim Flynn in a hard-fought 6 round KO over Dan Flynn. Unless, as was frequent in their time, a no-decision/newspaper decision/draw situation intervened.
Anthony