Page 1 of 1
limond vs khan - what was your scoring
Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 19:15
by boxerbob
of the fight when it got stopped???
i had it 77-74 khan
round 1.......10-9 khan
round 2.......10-9 khan
round 3.......10-9 limond
round 4.......10-10 even
round 5.......10-9 khan
round 6.......10-8 limond
round 7.......10-8 khan
round 8.......10-9 khan
5-2-1 in rounds
Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 19:19
by Albert
I had Khan winning the fight as I expected, but my oh my he got exposed this evening.
Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 19:30
by boxerbob
yes agree mate
he will only be a world champion if hes matched very very well
Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 19:36
by chesh
I had it 76-74 for Khan:
round 1.......10-9 khan
round 2.......10-9 khan
round 3.......10-9 limond
round 4.......10-9 limond
round 5.......10-9 khan
round 6.......10-8 limond
round 7.......10-8 khan
round 8.......10-9 khan
Posted: 14 Jul 2007, 19:41
by rooney
He will be exposedsoon enough - Thaxton would KO him
Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 08:16
by 1southpaw
i had it even at the stopage because the way i score fights is that if the rounds are close you give it to the champion
Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 08:52
by jamesmcdonnell
So in other words, you don't know how to score fights.
Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 11:33
by WildWaylon
Khan was IMO 2 rounds up and no more - Lucky for him they pulled Limond out because Khan was desperate, still unsteady and couldnt have gone much further - Had Limond gone for it which he didnt after Khan went down, Khan would have lost - Why didnt Limond finish him off, he knows the game well enough not to let Khan get a breather - Bollocks to Khan bravely fighting back to stop Limond - He had two chances given to him, being counted out by going down again but being allowed to continue and Willie Limond backing off instead of going for the kill.
Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 12:12
by 1southpaw
jamesmcdonnell wrote:So in other words, you don't know how to score fights.
everyone scores fights differently but the way i score a title fights is that you dont get no favours and you need to win clearly by not getting hit and hitting your opponent cleanly for most of the round/rounds
anyway i dont think it matters what i think because im not a judge

Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 12:30
by Max Molyneux
73 - 76 to Khan I think.
Or 5 rounds to 2 before the stoppage I think to Khan.
Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 12:40
by KO Artist
Albert wrote:I had Khan winning the fight as I expected, but my oh my he got exposed this evening.
Khan's defence is dreadgul, and his chin worse. Limon is feather fisted.
Good show by willie, whi is a natrual 130lb, wheras Khan is a massive lightweight who may end up at Welter.
Graham Earl would have knocked Khan spark out.
Olympic Silver he may have won, but the standard in amatuer boxing has been so poor for years.
Billy Schwer was ABA finalsist, but he was a much better amatuer and pro than Khan will ever be.
Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 13:46
by bennie
Khan showed he was all fighter. Limond was a step up and it showed, but Khan came through just two years after going pro. The criticism of him is baffling to me. He was slagged for blowing away bums, then grinds out a thrilling victory over a good fighter and is still slagged.
Posted: 15 Jul 2007, 14:07
by Kelly young
i think khan is a good boxer and should be learning the game before he starts to act up to all the hype even his corner warned him about showing off in the bout and the next round was nearly knock out and he even made a mess of the count as he went down on one knee at the count of seven and if the ref had the balls should have carried the count on but didnt . but i do think he would have made the count no problem i am only pointing out he still has a lot to learn . i also think that the public will start to wonder about khan as no disrepect to willie limont he has not got a knock out punch so i think they need to test the water with a proper light weight like say john thaxton or even andy morris and see if all the hype is worth it