Page 1 of 1
Mitchell V Khan: And the winner is?
Posted: 16 Jul 2007, 10:11
by 101boxing
who do you fancy?
Taking into consideration Khans weight advantage and generally being much bigger, who would you tip for this one should it happen?
Technically i think Mitchell is a better fighter, but the size and power of Khan could tip it his way.
Mitchell for me.
Posted: 16 Jul 2007, 10:15
by Dirk Kelly
Tough one this, think maybe too close to call but will be a slug fest while it lasted.
Posted: 16 Jul 2007, 10:34
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Mitchells defense is Gatti-esque, close your eyes throw your hand in front of you and your bound to find mitchell. His punch is probably a bit better than Limmond BUT his timing is nowhere near as good so he won't land as flush as Limmond. Khan mid round stoppage
Posted: 17 Jul 2007, 08:13
by dr_devious
Pick em, both have decent power and speed and crap defences. Whoever lands well first probably
Posted: 17 Jul 2007, 17:36
by Albert
Has Mitchell been decked by a non puncher?
Posted: 17 Jul 2007, 17:41
by rhino222
but has mitchell fought anyone who is/was 29-1 or whatever limmond was going into the fight.
lets not take anything away from willie, he is a good technician with cute boxing skills, he is a test for anyone at any reasonable level.
Posted: 17 Jul 2007, 17:56
by Albert
rhino222 wrote:but has mitchell fought anyone who is/was 29-1 or whatever limmond was going into the fight.
lets not take anything away from willie, he is a good technician with cute boxing skills, he is a test for anyone at any reasonable level.
But to get decked by him and badl shaken where no one would have grumbled if Khan had got stopped?