Page 1 of 1
Oh Why Did He Take That Fight?
Posted: 08 Sep 2007, 08:17
by Cap
In September of 1915, leading heavyweight contender Jim Coffey, almost sure to get a crack at Jess Willard's title, signed to fight Frank Moran and got knocked out. Coffey was never in the picture again. How many other contenders have done something similar?
Cap
Re: Oh Why Did He Take That Fight?
Posted: 08 Sep 2007, 08:53
by bennie
Cap wrote:In September of 1915, leading heavyweight contender Jim Coffey, almost sure to get a crack at Jess Willard's title, signed to fight Frank Moran and got knocked out. Coffey was never in the picture again. How many other contenders have done something similar?
Cap
Steve Hearon was WBC No. 1 light-welterweight in 1983 and guaranteed a shot at champ Bruce Curry - a man he had previously stopped. But he took on a then unknown Lupe Aquino and got busted up and stopped.
Posted: 08 Sep 2007, 09:40
by Woller
Johann Orsolics was garanteed a shot at Jose Napoles title, then he took on Eddie Perkins in a tune up fight and got knocked out very badly.
Eddie Machen v Ingemar Johansson ?
Woller
Frank Fletcher
Posted: 08 Sep 2007, 14:10
by tagjohnson
Frank "The Animal" Fletcher one of my alltime favorites, who never had a boring fight, was half a step away from a shot at Hagler when he took a fight with Wilfred Sycpion, got jabbed silly and lost his shot. Instead of trying to work his way back into contention with good but not dangerous opponents he kept taking fights against dangerous contenders like Juan Domnigo Roldan and Curtis Parker and kept getting knocked out. I think including the Sycpion fight he lost 4 or 5 of his last 6 fights. While we're at it why did Leon Spinks fight Gerrie Coetzee and what was Ken Norton thinking about fighting Earnie Shavers?
Posted: 08 Sep 2007, 18:39
by HomicideHenry
Bob Satterfield took on Ezzard Charles and had he not have, he probably would have gotten the shot at Marciano...because Charles took him out of the picture.
That or Tommy Gomez, had he not taken on Walcott and some others, he probably would have gotten a shot, though he would have gotten kayoed and fell off the radar in either rate.
Re: Frank Fletcher
Posted: 08 Sep 2007, 20:32
by BoxBuzz
tagjohnson wrote:Frank "The Animal" Fletcher one of my alltime favorites, who never had a boring fight, was half a step away from a shot at Hagler when he took a fight with Wilfred Sycpion, got jabbed silly and lost his shot. Instead of trying to work his way back into contention with good but not dangerous opponents he kept taking fights against dangerous contenders like Juan Domnigo Roldan and Curtis Parker and kept getting knocked out. I think including the Sycpion fight he lost 4 or 5 of his last 6 fights. While we're at it why did Leon Spinks fight Gerrie Coetzee and what was Ken Norton thinking about fighting Earnie Shavers?
The scariest thing about going to a Fletcher fight was his mom. She could do more damage to those sitting around her that weren't cheering her son on than Frank could do to his opponent in the ring.
Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 18:31
by granberry
Charlie Scott was the number one contender for Don Jordan's welterweight title and had a good chance to KO Jordan.
As a tune-up he fought nobody Benny Kid Paret and got clobbered and knocked flat on his back in the final round.
Paret never looked as good again. That night he was a great fighter, with blazing speed, boxing ability, a punch---everything.
Of course no tape of that fight is available.
Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 23:01
by granberry
Decagon wrote:Paret was a good fighter. Here's his knockout loss against Gene Fullmer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr3e1uz5Wnk
He did have a tendency to get tied up against the ropes, and Fullmer took advantage of this. Look at how just a half minute before the stoppage, he lands a series of eight or ten hard shots. If Fullmer hadn't been the tough son-of-a-bitch he was, he wouldn't have been able to get the knockout in that round.
Leave it to sicko Hexagon to come up with that.
That is one thing I will never watch again after seeing it happen when it did.
Hexagon has obviously never been hit in the head.
re
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 06:06
by barry
"Bombardier" Billy Wells...he had a big following in the UK and was being maneuvered to the top, but foolishly took on Al Palzer in New York and the brittleness of his chin was rather quickly discovered.
Wells had the offensive tools, without a doubt, but he lacked the killer instinct and durability to be a serious contender for the heavyweight crown, but he was one of the longest reigning British heavyweight champions in history and held that honor until Henry Cooper beat it!
Other than Al Palzer I guess I could name around six others that Wells should never have fought!
His bouts were certainly exciting though as one way, or the other...someone was getting knocked out!!!
Re: Frank Fletcher
Posted: 13 Sep 2007, 02:08
by markl
tagjohnson wrote:Frank "The Animal" Fletcher one of my alltime favorites, who never had a boring fight, was half a step away from a shot at Hagler when he took a fight with Wilfred Sycpion, got jabbed silly and lost his shot. Instead of trying to work his way back into contention with good but not dangerous opponents he kept taking fights against dangerous contenders like Juan Domnigo Roldan and Curtis Parker and kept getting knocked out. I think including the Sycpion fight he lost 4 or 5 of his last 6 fights. While we're at it why did Leon Spinks fight Gerrie Coetzee and what was Ken Norton thinking about fighting Earnie Shavers?
Norton & Spinks were fighting in eliminators. Spinks was just the semifinals. But not like they took the fights for no reason.
Morrison/Bentt cost him a few bucks.
Posted: 16 Sep 2007, 13:48
by zurdo
Meldrick Taylor fighting Terry Norris that was a bad career move...
Wasn't Micheal Bentt a last minute substifoe someone else, If I remember correctly Tommy was supposed to fight Razor Ruddock or someone like that
Posted: 16 Sep 2007, 20:36
by Expug
Ruby Goldstein was rolling along real good .
They put him in with Ace Hudkins and he got belted out.
After that it seemed he couldnt get past the rap of having a shaky beard.
Got stopped a few times after that although by a couple real good fighters including a great one in Jimmy McClarnin.
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 00:20
by Brute
It is this simple. If there is someone in your weight division you cannot beat, you are not the real champion.
Some people just get found out early.
Markl
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 14:39
by tagjohnson
I would respectfully disagree with you. If Norton had simply continued to fight against respectable competition he would have gotten a rematch with Holmes in very short order. After all he had lost a great and close fight defending his title. Fighting Shavers was nuts under any circumstances. Spinks wasn't going to get a rematch with Ali due to his retirement but fighting an up and coming power puncher like Coetzee in his first fight after losing to Ali makes no sense.
Posted: 17 Sep 2007, 16:02
by markl
I really can't follow your"logic" here. I don't believe the intention of the thread is who could have ducked and dodged their way to an eventual title shot.
These guys fought in eliminators. That's what men do. They just lost. None of these fights were taken as tuneups.
Both of their next fights would have been title shots. I bet either of them would take those fights again 100 times over.
Posted: 18 Sep 2007, 04:30
by Ezzard
Meldrick Taylor should not have fought Terry Norris. Taylor was just too small at the weight and never really got over this defeat.