Page 1 of 1
Rank these three Middleweights.
Posted: 08 Sep 2007, 11:49
by KOJOE90
George Benton.
http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer
Holly Mims.
http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer
Joey Archer.
http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer
Three outsanding Middleweights from the same era who all fought some of the greatest Middleweights and Welterweights of the modern era. All three fighters have some oustanding victories on their records yet none of the ever managed to win a World Title. In fact only Archer got a title shot which was quite remarkable really.
So how do you rate these three highly skilled craftsmen?
Posted: 08 Sep 2007, 11:52
by KOJOE90
Decagon wrote:Off the top of my head, Mims, Archer, Benton. I'll look at their records later, and give a more in-depth response.
My gut feeling was actually Benton, Mims then Archer. But in my opinion it's a real close call and one I need to give more thought.
Re: Rank these three Middleweights.
Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 16:50
by granberry
Benton was run by the mob in Philadelphia.
He was used as a policeman (a fighter used to clear the way of dangerous challengers for those holding the title). Otherwise he didn't get any fights.
Once he was through they let him fight more often.
He was one of the most skilled fighters of his time.
He bragged that he smoked 5 packs of cigarettes a day while he was fighting.
His style was mostly hidden, in close fighting.
His fight with Rubin Carter was a fake. Benton stood and posed and let Carter poke a jab at him and "win" a decision. Then Carter got a title fight against Giardello. Benton was obviously following instructions in that fight.
His career ended when he was shot in the back a number of times while walking down the street in Philly.
Since he was cheated out of his own career during his prime years, he had contempt for the kids he later trained who won the more recent cheese titles.
Mims was supposedly from Washington DC. He was actually run by people from Chicago.
That is why he he could't even win the decision in a fight he clearly won against Giardello in his own supposed home town of Washington, DC.
As a young fighter Mims beat Sugar Ray Robinson in the very next fight Robinson had after winning the middleweight title from LaMotta. They gave Robinson the stinkweed "decision."
That was the worst mistake Mims could have made. After that he was avoided like the plague.
Many of the fights he had on TV were fights he took as a subsitute with less than a week's notice (against Griffith, Carter and several others).
Mims knocked Rubin Carter down and beat him thoroughly and they gave Carter the decision.
Carter did not belong in the same ring with Benton or Mims (or Dick Tiger or Giardello).
Archer doesn't really belong in the group with Benton and Mims. Archer was white. He got two title fights.
Benton and Mims would never get a title fight if they lived to be 100 years old.
Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 17:41
by granberry
Decagon wrote:Fighting to instructions doesn't make a fighter better in my book. If he lost to Rubin Carter, it was his own damn fault.
His "instructions" were to lose, halfwit.
Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 18:00
by granberry
Decagon wrote:Exactly. And he lost. Throwing a fight's worse than being knocked out.
I can see you have a vast amount of experience with the mob.
People with the mob do as they are ordered.
Like Benton.
Like Liston.
Posted: 10 Sep 2007, 22:54
by granberry
Decagon wrote:Then it's their fault for being in the mob in the first place.
Poor Hexagon doesn't have a clue what goes on in boxing.
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 01:52
by Jaclem
...decagon....fighters aren't IN the mob...the mob gets into THEM...
holly mims wore handcuffs more often than jimmy cagney did in all of his movies put together...
..when he was allowed to he showed he could punch as well as being such a good tactician. an example...a hotshot named willie troy was coming along and was pegged as a sure-thing future champion, and he wasn't a bad fighter. he was tossed in against mims who completley outboxed him, gave him a lesson, really, before knocking him out. and that was the beginnning of end of the willie troy bubble bursting.
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 13:35
by Jaclem
..decagon..true..but sometimes the "temptation" is in the form of a promise of cement footwear.
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 13:42
by Martin Sosa Cameron
1 Joey Archer
2 George Benton
3 Holly Mims
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 13:44
by Martin Sosa Cameron
Remembering this boys, I thinks in another very good fighter of their time
Henry Hank
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 13:46
by dempseyfire
Carter-Benton was definetely NOT a thrown fight. Both fighters fought ferociously for the entire distance. Carter was on that night and just did more damage.
I'd say Archer first, then Mims, then Benton, but all 3 were very close and all excellent fighters.
Re: Rank these three Middleweights.
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 14:08
by KOJOE90
granberry wrote:Archer doesn't really belong in the group with Benton and Mims. Archer was white. He got two title fights.
Do you mean Archer doesn't belong in this group for ability reasons or social/political reasons?
When I made this thread I was purely thinking on an ability level.
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 16:33
by HomicideHenry
Joey Archer, NY's battling Irishman, failed twice in title shots against Emile Griffith....but beated the likes of Dick Tiger, an older Sugar Ray Robinson, Rubin Hurricane Carter, and Holly Mims (to name a few).
Holly Mims lost to Carter, Archer, Griffith, Dick Tiger, Joey Giardello, Sugar Ray Robinson, Rocky Castellani...but defeated a young Jimmy Ellis (same Ellis who fought Frazier, Ali, etc), Spider Webb, Milo Savage, Charley Green, to name a few.
George Benton defeated Jimmy Ellis, Joey Giardello, Holly Mims, Johnny Morris (for the Pennsylvania State title) but he also lost to Mims, Rubin Carter, Charley Joseph, Henry Hank...
In short, my list goes as:
1. Mims
2. Archer
3.Benton
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 21:01
by Jaclem
..deco...i'm not glorifying guys who threw fights or taking away from the vast majority of those who didn't. just pointing out that many were victims of circumstances, sometimes beyond their control.
two contrasting cases...jake lamotta was given a shot at the middle title only because he agreed to tank it against billy fox.
when frankie carbo made an offer to sugar ray robinson ...sugar to throw the first fight against lamotta for the title..jake to throw the second...and the third be on the level...the sugar man said to tell jake " to keep his guard up and his ass off the floor." there is no indication that lamotta had anything to do this.
very early in his career, but he was still making a name for himself, ezzard charles scored a knockout. in the dressing room he raised hell...saying he didn't hit the guy that hard and demanded to know if anyone in his camp had done business. only after he was convinced that his opponent was just taking the easy way out did ezzard calm down.
Posted: 11 Sep 2007, 22:19
by HomicideHenry
I remember the mob tried to have Marciano go in the tank against Don Cockell, but The Rock had nothing of it.
Posted: 12 Sep 2007, 00:33
by Jaclem
Posted: 12 Sep 2007, 09:03
by Ambling Alp
This is an interesting topic that KOJoe started. All 3 fought in the same era and were pretty even. They each fought a lot of good competition and won some and lost some. It really shows how much depth there was in the middleweight divison during this time and how often the top fighters were willing to fight each other.
I am going to rank them 1. Archer 2. Benton 3. Mims. However they are so close that you could really put them in any order.
Re: Rank these three Middleweights.
Posted: 18 Feb 2011, 07:15
by Ezzard
Bump!