PAUL SMITH CONTENDER FANS - DON'T LOOK AT FIGHT N**S.COM
Posted: 10 Oct 2007, 12:47
Fightnews.com have put up the result and details of Paul Smith's online
shit man not even allowed to put in the rival site's name,chris s wrote:Sorry meant fightn**s.com not fightviews
Just so mad when I saw that happened
I have avoided the site - but you're as much as a pr1ck by saying don't look at it.....that makes me think he got beat.chris s wrote:fightviews.com have put up the result and details of Paul Smith's online
Still had a prick last time I looked old son, so dare say I am one.E wrote:I have avoided the site - but you're as much as a pr1ck by saying don't look at it.....that makes me think he got beat.chris s wrote:fightviews.com have put up the result and details of Paul Smith's online
Well the implication is that he lost so don't look.........chris s wrote:Still had a prick last time I looked old son, so dare say I am one.E wrote:I have avoided the site - but you're as much as a pr1ck by saying don't look at it.....that makes me think he got beat.chris s wrote:fightviews.com have put up the result and details of Paul Smith's online
Don't be such a knob old bean, just telling people not to look unless they want to know how he got on.
How is that giving the result?
Honestly, you are getting the wrong end of the stick. I guess there is quiet a lot of traffic on this site that goes there also as it is a decent info base.E wrote:Well the implication is that he lost so don't look.........chris s wrote:Still had a prick last time I looked old son, so dare say I am one.E wrote: I have avoided the site - but you're as much as a pr1ck by saying don't look at it.....that makes me think he got beat.
Don't be such a knob old bean, just telling people not to look unless they want to know how he got on.
How is that giving the result?
Alternatively the very fact that you are talking about the result and pointing it out makes it more tempting and likely people will look
Ok but I am feeling really tempted to look now.........chris s wrote:Honestly, you are getting the wrong end of the stick. I guess there is quiet a lot of traffic on this site that goes there also as it is a decent info base.E wrote:Well the implication is that he lost so don't look.........chris s wrote: Still had a prick last time I looked old son, so dare say I am one.
Don't be such a knob old bean, just telling people not to look unless they want to know how he got on.
How is that giving the result?
Alternatively the very fact that you are talking about the result and pointing it out makes it more tempting and likely people will look
If they go on there tonight the result is there on the first page. All I was suggesting is don't go there if you don't want to know what happened
There is no implication or agenda by what I've put on this thread.
We are.SticknMove wrote:Got a feeling that Bika will be next up this coming Sunday, then Smigga the following week. I think we are two shows behind the ESPN broadcast.