Page 1 of 3
BBBC - Enza Sellers sanctioned?
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 18:49
by Abbo
Am I wrong, or do the BBBC have the right / duty to refuse to sanction fights that are THIS bad?
They do dont they?
I'm emailing Simon Block.
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 19:24
by stujones
Yes they do, but I doubt they will.
They did not allow a young Maccarinelli to defend his WBU title against the credible (at that time) Jorge Castro- so they could, but doubt they will.
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 20:55
by vargas
They let the fight with Bobby Gunn go ahead. So theres no way they'll not sanction a fight against Sellers, who at one time was a very good fighter.
Posted: 12 Oct 2007, 21:54
by josh fg
I don't think the BBBoC want to get in a fight with Warren and although it won't be an entertaining fight the only reson they can say no is if someone risks being perminantly injured which I don't believe is the case.
This is a promotional problem not a sanctioning problem. If there is a sancitoning problem its the WBO you should email they should be only sanctioning competitive fights.
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 04:01
by Abbo
No response from Simon Block

Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 04:21
by EddieShredder
Abbo wrote:No response from Simon Block

To be fair to the guy, he's probably only been at work for 15mins or so since the weekend, presuming you sent the email on friday afternoon.
As important a matter as this is, it is a monday morning, so for the first hour of the day, he's probably staring blankly out of the window, drinking tea, reading the pages of the nuts or zoo weekly websites, and updating his facebook

Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 06:22
by silkov
Warren more or less owns the board since he saved them from going bankrupt so dont expect them to start not sanctioning his fights unless the guy is on a drip or something!.... remember Bobby Gunn.... at least Sellers used to be a decent fighter!.... so I suppose there is some improvement in the 'match up'!.... 8)

:x
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 12:13
by boxingchat
silkov wrote:Warren more or less owns the board since he saved them from going bankrupt so dont expect them to start not sanctioning his fights unless the guy is on a drip or something!.... remember Bobby Gunn.... at least Sellers used to be a decent fighter!.... so I suppose there is some improvement in the 'match up'!.... 8)

:x
Owns the Board, don't think so.
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 12:22
by jamesmcdonnell
Whilst of course the board is not owned by anyone, you surely agree BC, that without Warren's intervention, they would probably have gone completely bankrupt, given their position following the Watson case.
This does create something of an unusual situation in boxing does it not? Surely the board must feel they owe Warren a great deal under the circumstances.
I am not suggesting any impropriety on Warren's part, merely suggesting that the board may feel a little handcuffed in their dealings with him, due to a debt of gratitude?
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 13:17
by silkov
Lets not beat around the bush he basically owns them in everything except name.... can you imagine someone like Alex Fergusen paying the FA's debts!....
....he didnt do it just out of the kindness of his heart either.
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 13:21
by jamesmcdonnell
You may say that, but I couldn't possibly comment.....
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 13:39
by silkov
Now, now James, watch for those splinters while you sit on the fence!... 8)

.....
...seriously though its pretty obviously a conflict of interests isnt it?... or am I just getting old fashioned in my old age!...

:x
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 18:07
by sweetscience
EddieShredder wrote:Abbo wrote:No response from Simon Block

To be fair to the guy, he's probably only been at work for 15mins or so since the weekend, presuming you sent the email on friday afternoon.
As important a matter as this is, it is a monday morning, so for the first hour of the day, he's probably staring blankly out of the window, drinking tea, reading the pages of the nuts or zoo weekly websites, and updating his facebook

quality post
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 18:17
by steve689
Remind me again why the board refused Castro yet accepted Bobby Gunn esq?
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 18:20
by jamesmcdonnell
Now come Steve, we couldn't possibly hope to understand the byzantine workings of those geniuses at the board of control. Those egg heads know more about boxing and fighters than we could hope to learn, and then forget, indeed more than we've forgottn, or yet to learn, or perhaps forgot to learn.
Indeed it was only the magnificence of Enzo that rebuffed the truly doughty challenge of Gunn.
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 18:21
by steve689
As simple as that eh? Please excuse my impetuous interruption

Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:11
by silkov
Yep, we're obviously beyond all help on here!... maybe we should switch to UFC??.... I'm going now to watch my Hulk Hogan videos!.... :x :x :x

8)
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:24
by Max Molyneux
silkov wrote:Yep, we're obviously beyond all help on here!... maybe we should switch to UFC??.... I'm going now to watch my Hulk Hogan videos!.... :x :x :x

8)
UFC Is Immoral, only people who are possessed by the same Serpent who convince Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit watch the UFC.
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:37
by kevo
Max Molyneux wrote:UFC Is Immoral
Yeah, organized, sanctioned fights are disgusting.
Hang on a minute...... :)
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:45
by Max Molyneux
Boxing Is made equal though both fight with fists, UFC can match a Karate man Vs a Street brawler.
That Is not moral.
*(note) I am not really being serious, I have read too much Moralman posts on ESB and I'm crazy at the moment.
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:47
by kevo
Moralman? Sounds like a right barrel of laughs!!

Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:48
by silkov
Max Molyneux wrote:silkov wrote:Yep, we're obviously beyond all help on here!... maybe we should switch to UFC??.... I'm going now to watch my Hulk Hogan videos!.... :x :x :x

8)
UFC Is Immoral, only people who are possessed by the same Serpent who convince Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit watch the UFC.
Yeah!... I bet Fwanks a big fan!... perhaps thats his game!.... turn everyone off boxing and onto UFC!!!!!.... the guys a bloody double agent!!!..... :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:49
by Max Molyneux
Kevo wrote:Moralman? Sounds like a right barrel of laughs!!

He Is.
He makes fantasy threads Involving Adam West Batman Vs Bin Laden.
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:51
by Max Molyneux
silkov wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:silkov wrote:Yep, we're obviously beyond all help on here!... maybe we should switch to UFC??.... I'm going now to watch my Hulk Hogan videos!.... :x :x :x

8)
UFC Is Immoral, only people who are possessed by the same Serpent who convince Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit watch the UFC.
Yeah!... I bet Fwanks a big fan!... perhaps thats his game!.... turn everyone off boxing and onto UFC!!!!!.... the guys a bloody double agent!!!..... :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x
Unless Frank was possessed by the Serpent who convinced Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit then he would never be a fan of UFC.
UFC does not have a Calzaghe In It either so It Is not Moral.
Posted: 15 Oct 2007, 19:54
by josh fg
clearly Bin Laden he's 6 ft 5 and has a reach advantage