Page 1 of 2
Sanctioning Fees for WBF?
Posted: 05 Nov 2007, 20:11
by Grant
Does anyone know how much sanctioning fees are? Is it a percentage of the gate? or a set fee. and how much are the WBF fees as opposed to the major organisations?
I notice that Sonny Michaelangelo has prefered to fight for the WBF Lt Heavyweight belt rather than the rematch with SHannon. Anyone know why?.
Anyway .....go the bloods in 2008
Posted: 06 Nov 2007, 06:01
by Brute
Sanctioning fees? I would think the WBF would have to pay people to fight for their dinky belts

Posted: 06 Nov 2007, 06:10
by Grant
Brute wrote:Sanctioning fees? I would think the WBF would have to pay people to fight for their dinky belts

Title belts are like government buildings, some of the worst run governments have the best buildings.
The WBF belt is the best looking, ergo............
Posted: 06 Nov 2007, 18:25
by Marlin
I reckon Anto might have some answers on this. He seems to be 'up' with the WBF...
Posted: 07 Nov 2007, 20:30
by tilly69
Posted: 07 Nov 2007, 21:07
by AntonS
Yeah Marlin.
It's only a matter of time WBF offers me an executive possy and 26 overseas junkets per year.

Posted: 07 Nov 2007, 22:17
by Marlin
When they do can I be Heavyweight Champ!?! :P
Posted: 08 Nov 2007, 02:05
by middleman
Marlin wrote:When they do can I be Heavyweight Champ!?! :P
how soon can u pay the wbf the 5 grand the belts yours,we can bring an overweight thai over 4 u hows that sound champ?

Posted: 08 Nov 2007, 06:29
by Grant
Has to be a taxi driver though
Posted: 08 Nov 2007, 16:30
by middleman
your right mate,but didnt u now most of them cab drivers already hold wbf titles.

Posted: 08 Nov 2007, 17:21
by Marlin
Posted: 10 Nov 2007, 06:49
by jomothepure
You can't put a figure on WBF sanctioning. It's priceless. Literally.
Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 00:46
by Brute
Actually, the most recent WBF Heavyweight champ, Albert Sosnowski, does not have a bad record. He's no Wladimir Klitschko, but then again he is not Joe Bugner either. :(
Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 02:35
by middleman
Brute wrote:Actually, the most recent WBF Heavyweight champ, Albert Sosnowski, does not have a bad record. He's no Wladimir Klitschko, but then again he is not Joe Bugner either. :(
mate pat kennedy could be a wbf heaveyweight champ its that easy,pay and your there,who did sosnoski beat to win the title?a blown up thai???dont u relise the wbf giv fighters that cant win a world title the chance to buy one,i call then claytons titles

its sad.

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 04:49
by Sapphire
middleman wrote:Brute wrote:Actually, the most recent WBF Heavyweight champ, Albert Sosnowski, does not have a bad record. He's no Wladimir Klitschko, but then again he is not Joe Bugner either. :(
mate pat kennedy could be a wbf heaveyweight champ its that easy,pay and your there,who did sosnoski beat to win the title?a blown up thai???dont u relise the wbf giv fighters that cant win a world title the chance to buy one,i call then claytons titles

its sad.

He Beat Lawrence Tauasa. And yes Pat Kennendy could be WBF World champ beacuse I think He could beat both those guys. Then use it to get a big pay day fight against a big name fighter. Its good in a way for fighters who want to step up in class but can't get into the big league, with the crappy WBF title they at least have something to bring to the table. I'd rather fight for the IBF Pan-Pacific than the WBF World title.
Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 16:40
by middleman
Scott Edwards wrote:middleman wrote:Brute wrote:Actually, the most recent WBF Heavyweight champ, Albert Sosnowski, does not have a bad record. He's no Wladimir Klitschko, but then again he is not Joe Bugner either. :(
mate pat kennedy could be a wbf heaveyweight champ its that easy,pay and your there,who did sosnoski beat to win the title?a blown up thai???dont u relise the wbf giv fighters that cant win a world title the chance to buy one,i call then claytons titles

its sad.

He Beat Lawrence Tauasa. And yes Pat Kennendy could be WBF World champ beacuse I think He could beat both those guys. Then use it to get a big pay day fight against a big name fighter. Its good in a way for fighters who want to step up in class but can't get into the big league, with the crappy WBF title they at least have something to bring to the table. I'd rather fight for the IBF Pan-Pacific than the WBF World title.
there u go lawrence is a cruiser wen he trains,the only way kennedy could hold a wbf world title is if he fought brett smith 4 one,and no one in there right mind would pay to watch that one,and only the wbf would sanction it.lets b fair to pat lets see him get past kirby first at cronullain a few weeks.

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 18:26
by Marlin
middleman wrote:Scott Edwards wrote:middleman wrote:mate pat kennedy could be a wbf heaveyweight champ its that easy,pay and your there,who did sosnoski beat to win the title?a blown up thai???dont u relise the wbf giv fighters that cant win a world title the chance to buy one,i call then claytons titles

its sad.

He Beat Lawrence Tauasa. And yes Pat Kennendy could be WBF World champ beacuse I think He could beat both those guys. Then use it to get a big pay day fight against a big name fighter. Its good in a way for fighters who want to step up in class but can't get into the big league, with the crappy WBF title they at least have something to bring to the table. I'd rather fight for the IBF Pan-Pacific than the WBF World title.
there u go lawrence is a cruiser wen he trains,the only way kennedy could hold a wbf world title is if he fought brett smith 4 one,and no one in there right mind would pay to watch that one,and only the wbf would sanction it.lets b fair to pat lets see him get past kirby first at cronullain a few weeks.

Tauasa is a good fighter, I reckon he would beat Pat handily.
Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 20:24
by Brute
I said he was no Klitschko, but he has won 41 fights for 1 loss with 25KO wins. With that sort of record he can't be completely hopeless.

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 20:29
by razor7
I notice Solomon Haumono has been added to the Mundine card as has Hoppa who fights the clever Brian Fitzgerald. I just hope that this time they step up Solo's standard of opponent though I suppose thats asking too much!
Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 22:27
by middleman
razor7 wrote:I notice Solomon Haumono has been added to the Mundine card as has Hoppa who fights the clever Brian Fitzgerald. I just hope that this time they step up Solo's standard of opponent though I suppose thats asking too much!
wow brian will b wrapped someone refered to him as clever,his just lucky his getting a payday b 4 chrissy,and the mundine camp dont hav 2 waste money flying a below par nz heavyweight out 4 2 rds.

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 22:40
by Marlin
You guys are aware that Brian Fitzgerald already has a win over Hoppa, right?

Posted: 15 Nov 2007, 23:44
by Brute
Hopfrog is a fucken joke anyway.
Posted: 16 Nov 2007, 01:50
by Brute
Maybe Solo could fight Mark de Mori. Mark has not fought since March.
Posted: 17 Nov 2007, 18:48
by middleman
Brute wrote:Maybe Solo could fight Mark de Mori. Mark has not fought since March.
that would be the end 4 demori,if it happened it could be included in 07 mismatches ko win to solo 2 rds

Posted: 17 Nov 2007, 20:37
by Brute
Boxrec rates de Mori above Haumona. ANBF rates him two places behind Solo. If Mark wants to justify his place he will have to fight Solo sooner or later.
