WBA should reconsider 'super ' champs
Posted: 05 Nov 2007, 20:57
Its just that I saw this in the 'British Forum' and I think it is funny and sad at the same time. The WBA should hang it's head in shame for allowing this statement to be made.
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Yes, it's the single most damaging factor for the sport.
When you get Audley announced live on the BBC as 'the heavyweight champion of the world', you know things are getting serious.
it also allows talented fighters to get devloped and ultimately, if there is a lot of talent, you get more good fighters. even Joe won a vacant title and grew into it. like IBF champ Bute is doing now
there are loads of negatives though.
Anway, Joe doesn't have the WBA regular belt, only the super version.
All we need to know is that Joe is the man at the weight, which he either proved vs Lacy or Kessler. That he beat both makes him the clear #1.
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
Yes, it's the single most damaging factor for the sport.
When you get Audley announced live on the BBC as 'the heavyweight champion of the world', you know things are getting serious.
it also allows talented fighters to get devloped and ultimately, if there is a lot of talent, you get more good fighters. even Joe won a vacant title and grew into it. like IBF champ Bute is doing now
there are loads of negatives though.
Anway, Joe doesn't have the WBA regular belt, only the super version.
All we need to know is that Joe is the man at the weight, which he either proved vs Lacy or Kessler. That he beat both makes him the clear #1.