Page 1 of 2

haye v maccarinelli.........yes or no, one more fight ?

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:05
by rhino222
just a simple yes or no.

should david haye, just for the sake of british boxing, drop down to cruiser for one more fight, a big moneyspinner with enzo maccarinelli, in london cos haye is now the boss man so deserves home advantage, on a huge maloney promotion.

come on frank, persuade david to do it, for the good of british boxing, please, just one more cruiserweight tilt !

so my answer is a big fat.....

YES

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:11
by Horse
Yes.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:32
by Deserter
No.
Haye has proved he's the man at Cruiser while bar Braithwaite Enzo has been content to talk the talk but not walk the walk. I'll never forgive him for the Bobby Gunn fiasco and his latest fight was a joke as well, especially when he had a better opponent clearly willing to face him.
Haye is clearly murdering himself to make Cruiser and shouldn't be risking his body and health any more. He's done what he wanted to do and now he needs to get in with the big boys and start mixing it up!

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:34
by no your stuff
well don to the haymaker.a great performance last knight. my first time to see him fight i was impressed. what a big man for a cruserweight.
as the man said himself getting down to14.4 was very hard.
the last person he needs in front of him is a hungery enzo

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:34
by rhino222
so 2-1 in favour of 'yes' at the moment.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:35
by rhino222
oops...2-2

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:37
by PompeyScot
No.

Haye has killed himself for a while now to make the weight, and has made no secret that the Mormeck fight would be his last at the weight. Basically, he has nothing else to prove at cruiser. He's gone to the home of the recognised number one of the division and KO'd him, taken the belts and is now ready to move up. He doesn't owe anybody anything.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:39
by Autobarn
NO. Otherwise you're bending over backwards to give Sports Network all the advantages. Macca's not worthy and when Haye sees the Setanta video you'd think he won't be very happy.

I want to see Haye back on Sky. With non-SN hijacked studio pundits and with Maloney in control of the promotion. Fight a novetly fight like Roman Greenberg or a moving up O'Neil Bell. Then take on a hard headed, durable, light hitting heavy. Have some fights in the States, have some at home.

Macca needs Haye for real respect (and to headline a show of his own). Haye has the marketability and the credentials right now. He can do what he wants as he readies for the heavyweight attack.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:45
by Ally-M1
Haye is finished at Crusier... Enzo must surely realise this, despite him crashing on about a fight at Cruiser.

No.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:47
by rhino222
yes 2

no 5

and i like the sound of haye v greenburg for a starter

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:48
by WildWaylon
Sorry Rhino, has to be a no from me, as much as I would love to see them fight.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 10:51
by DG.
NO!

What has Haye got to gain?

He is the UNDISPUTED Cruiserweight King.


Money? - he will make much more money up at Heavyweight especially now he moves up having held the top belts.

Why give Enzo the opportunity?

If Fwanky offers £1.6M then it is stil not worth it imo.

Haye is 50% at Cruiserweight and to beat Enzo he will need to be at least 70%


Move to Heavyweight NOW.





:TU:

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 11:36
by Syntax Error
I would love to see it, but paring his body down to CW is killing Haye & I don't think he'd fancy doing it & going up against a puncher like Enzo.

It might be interesting if Enzo himself was to jump up to HW; he's certainly big enough to do so. :-?

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 12:34
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Yes, British boxing needs fights like this BUT Enzo should do it on Hayes terms. Haye may or maynot do wonderfully at HW, if he doesn't he can at least have had a great British fight at Cruser for all the marbles

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 12:49
by Rocky Balboa
Haye, in beating Mormeck, is now ranked as the recognised No.1 @ Cruiser. Haye said last night he's moving up to HW, & I for one am glad he is. Haye cannot keep making the weight, it's as simple as that! What did David weigh on fight night?

Haye stated last night that if the fight against Enzo happens, it has to be up @ heavy, or it doesn't happen. Whilst I appreciate Enzo uis not a natural HW at the moment, it may happen in time.

I, like the rest of you, want the fight to happen, but I don't wan't to see a guy deplete himself to make 200lbs, only to lose a fight because of such weight-making difficulties. It's not about that!

Anyway, I really think it's academic what we think or would like. Haye has made his decision & I hope he sticks to it!

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 13:15
by rhino222
but what i will say to you all is that its only 3 and a half years since haye was making 13st 8lbs !!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 13:19
by Autobarn
He's much bigger than the lean guy who fought Thompson.

I think he was quite heavy vs Delaney, and he's got gradually more muscular with the Rossito and Frago fights.

By Fragomeni, he was looking massively muscled.

Enzo, the ball's in your court. Have a 1 off at heavy. Or sweep up all the belts. You may as well start off with the Huck-Cunningham winner! Pick up the scraps - you have the skills to do so.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 13:21
by yiddo14
No, not at cruiserweight.

Haye said he would love the fight at heavyweight, so Enzo should bow to Hayes demands or forget it and go back to his Bobby Gunn's :TU:

Haye is the main man now so why should he fight Enzo at a disadvantage?

Would like to see it, but only on the champions terms.So a no from me.

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 13:21
by leforge
When will Haye next fight be?

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 13:51
by mrbassie
yiddo14 wrote:No, not at cruiserweight.

Haye said he would love the fight at heavyweight, so Enzo should bow to Hayes demands or forget it and go back to his Bobby Gunn's :TU:

Haye is the main man now so why should he fight Enzo at a disadvantage?

Would like to see it, but only on the champions terms.So a no from me.
my thoughts exactly

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 14:02
by rhino222
Autobarn wrote:I think he was quite heavy vs Delaney, and he's got gradually more muscular with the Rossito and Frago fights.

By Fragomeni, he was looking massively muscled.
but how? and im certainly not implying anything on the 'juice' front, im just saying that, the human body does not continue to grow with men in their 20's, unless there is a pituitary problem or a hormonal one. the human man will increase weight as they get deep into their 30's as the metabolism starts to slow down !

is it hayes training regime, weights etc, that is causing the weight increase, and is so why? because if you are struggling to make the weight then you should not pump iron, simple as. calzaghe struggles big time to make weight, he does not use weight training at all as part of his training regime.

so why is haye struggling to make the weight? why and how has he bulked up?

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 14:03
by BAMBI
in the words of franky boy warren - "Fuk No"

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 14:06
by Poncey
Fkc No!!!

Haye is at a disadvantage. Macca should fight at a catch weight of 210 (appreciate Haye is still going to have to lose 20lbs, but it's a better option).

I don't buy the Macca excuse that he's not able to ooperate well above 200lbs

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 16:19
by rasputin
NO!!!

Re: haye v maccarinelli.........yes or no, one more fight ?

Posted: 11 Nov 2007, 16:23
by Albert
rhino222 wrote:just a simple yes or no.

should david haye, just for the sake of british boxing, drop down to cruiser for one more fight, a big moneyspinner with enzo maccarinelli, in london cos haye is now the boss man so deserves home advantage, on a huge maloney promotion.

come on frank, persuade david to do it, for the good of british boxing, please, just one more cruiserweight tilt !

so my answer is a big fat.....

YES
Yes!!!!!!!!!