Page 1 of 1
UK v's USA
Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 16:24
by sweetscience
as us brits seemed to be kicking arse on the world scene what do you think the results would be if we pitted our best v's their best
as follows maybe:-
Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v Luevanno
i left the lower weights out cause neither have much depth
i think we would give them a bit of a kicking - i a might post this on the current scene just to rub there noses in it
Re: UK v's USA
Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 17:45
by oliverfennell
sweetscience wrote:as us brits seemed to be kicking arse on the world scene what do you think the results would be if we pitted our best v's their best
as follows maybe:-
Skelton v
Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v
Lacy
Duddy v
Pavlik
Moore v
Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v
PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v
Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v
Luevanno
i left the lower weights out cause neither have much depth
i think we would give them a bit of a kicking - i a might post this on the current scene just to rub there noses in it
Re: UK v's USA
Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 19:09
by stujones
sweetscience wrote:as us brits seemed to be kicking arse on the world scene what do you think the results would be if we pitted our best v's their best
as follows maybe:-
Skelton v
Thompson
Haye v
Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v
Pavlik
Moore v
Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v
PBF
Witter v Hopkins/
Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v
Diaz If you mean Juan.
Arthur v
Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v
Luevanno
i left the lower weights out cause neither have much depth
i think we would give them a bit of a kicking - i a might post this on the current scene just to rub there noses in it
Re: UK v's USA
Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 19:34
by Neri
Neri says wrote:
Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks, Moore v De La Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Juarez DRAW
Matthews v Luevanno
Re: UK v's USA
Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 19:38
by Mario
Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya MOORE OVER SPINKS
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Juarez
Matthews v Luevanno
Re: UK v's USA
Posted: 20 Nov 2007, 19:43
by josh fg
sweetscience wrote:as us brits seemed to be kicking arse on the world scene what do you think the results would be if we pitted our best v's their best
as follows maybe:-
Skelton v
Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
although if the odds are long enough I'm betting on BHOP
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v
Pavlik are you fornicating kidding me
Moore v
Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v
PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
don't know enough about Diaz
Arthur v
Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v Luevanno
don't know enough about both
i left the lower weights out cause neither have much depth
i think we would give them a bit of a kicking - i a might post this on the current scene just to rub there noses in it
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 03:02
by HairyBoxe24
Wouldn't post it on Currentscene, as many of ours would get knocked out.
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 03:41
by Carbo
Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Duddy v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks/De Le Hoya
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Hopkins/Mallinargi
Khan/Thaxton/Earl v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Jaurses
Matthews v Luevanno
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 04:38
by DavidPayne
Williams v THOMPSON
HAYE v Cunningham
WOODS v Hopkins
CALZAGHE v Lacy
Eastman v PAVLIK
Moore v SPINKS
HATTON v Floyd
WITTER v Mallinargi
Thaxton v DIAZ
Arthur v JUAREZ
Matthews v LUEVENNO
5-6 to the USA. IF YOU PICK THE RIGHT TEAM.
Re: UK v's USA
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 05:01
by Podmore_Birmingham
Skelton v Thompson
Haye v Cunningham
Calzaghe v Hopkins
Froch v Lacy
Elcock v Pavlik
Moore v Spinks
Hatton v PBF
Witter v Malignaggi
Thaxton v Diaz
Arthur v Rocky Juarez
Matthews v Luevanno
Tom Podmore.
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 05:11
by Autobarn
Haye would flatten the awful Cunningham
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 05:31
by Tykemania
DavidPayne wrote:Williams v THOMPSON
HAYE v Cunningham
WOODS v Hopkins
CALZAGHE v Lacy
Eastman v PAVLIK
Moore v SPINKS
HATTON v Floyd
WITTER v Mallinargi
Thaxton v DIAZ
Arthur v JUAREZ
Matthews v LUEVENNO
5-6 to the USA. IF YOU PICK THE RIGHT TEAM.
Slightly amended, but if you pick the RIGHT team...
HAYE v Thompson
MACCARINELLI v Cunningham
CALZAGHE or WOODS v Hopkins
FROCH or CALZAGHE v Lacy
Elcock v PAVLIK
Moore v SPINKS***
HATTON v Floyd***
WITTER v Mallinargi
Thaxton v DIAZ
ARTHUR v Juarez
Matthews v LUEVENNO
Would make 7-4 to the Brits. The two I've asterisked are debateable - I wonder if Moore (or Bradley Price) might edge out Spinks, and Hatton to beat Floyd may well be aspirational. However, even allowing for two defeats, we still go over 6 to 5.
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 07:40
by stujones
I am a bit surprised that I am the only one to tip Cunnigham to beat the weight drained Haye we saw two weeks ago.
If they made it at 15 stone then I agree with you all, just think he is not going to reign very long should he stick to Cruiser. Cunnigham might not be as strong as Mormeck - but he is slick and quicker, and Mormeck was catching Haye too easily.
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 07:48
by josh fg
I think those who put it Haye Thompson Enzo Cunningham were perhaps more realistic. Those could well be two british wins.
Posted: 21 Nov 2007, 09:04
by sweetscience
josh fg wrote:I think those who put it Haye Thompson Enzo Cunningham were perhaps more realistic. Those could well be two british wins.
i agree with those two changes to my original list