Page 1 of 2

Ian Napa v Martin Power Poll !!

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 08:42
by MPG
I tip Martin Power to win on points in a closely fought fight.

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 09:11
by Wales
I actually dont care. Probably wont watch or record the bill, which is a bit sad isnt it.

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 09:21
by THEBUTCH
Very interesting re-match. I had Napa winning the first fight, but struggle to pick a winner this time.

Errrr.....Napa on points as he's the man in form and had the edge last time.

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 09:45
by oliverfennell
Napa wins; he's riding a big wave of momentum, while Power hasn't recouped from two heavy defeats. Napa might even get the stoppage he was well on his way to getting legitimately against Haskins.

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 09:50
by WildWaylon
I cant quite see Napa getting the stoppage but points is almost a cert for him.

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 10:10
by Captain Hook
Napa on points, he's looked good in his last two outings...

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 18:59
by MPG
Wales wrote:I actually dont care. Probably wont watch or record the bill, which is a bit sad isnt it.
If you dont care or wont record or even watch the fight,WHY the fornicate would you post to tell us that.
This is gona be a cracking fight,2 excellent fighters slugging it out for the british title!!!

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 19:19
by Max Molyneux
Napa Is Toney like.

Power might be affected mentally by the Munyai defeats so I'll go for Napa.

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 20:29
by observer1
Dont know who they are, so not going to Vote.

But Martin 'Power' sounds like has the edge with that name.

Posted: 29 Nov 2007, 23:29
by Coco
observer1 wrote:Dont know who they are, so not going to Vote.

But Martin 'Power' sounds like has the edge with that name.
You don't follow boxing much then??

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 06:02
by HairyBoxe24
:-? Why's everyone saying Napa has been looking good lately? Very confusing, he's been slowly getting worse through out his last 3 fights, and was getting spanked by Haskins till Haskins picked up the injury.

From where I'm sitting, Napa's got worse and Haskins 27 so he could surely of only got better.. unless getting stopped twice took something away from him, but don't kid yourself in to thinking Napa would of got anything else then KO'd by that Munyai guy.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 06:11
by oliverfennell
HairyBoxe24 wrote::-? Why's everyone saying Napa has been looking good lately? Very confusing, he's been slowly getting worse through out his last 3 fights, and was getting spanked by Haskins till Haskins picked up the injury.

From where I'm sitting, Napa's got worse and Haskins 27 so he could surely of only got better.. unless getting stopped twice took something away from him, but don't kid yourself in to thinking Napa would of got anything else then KO'd by that Munyai guy.
Napa was excellent against Haskins. Sure he took a lot of stick in the early rounds, but he remained calm, didn't waste energy, made his shots count, and then was firmly on top from round four onwards. He would have stopped Haskins even without the injury.

The fight was a lot like Pryce v Small, and Pryce is another who people are saying has improved a lot.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 06:30
by HairyBoxe24
I remember betting on Napa in the fight and thinking, I've lost this...untill the knock out, not that a clear memory though so I'll take your word for it.

Been a big fan of Napa how he fights, even though he's not much power.. But this is the first time I betted agaisnt him.. I just think he's slowing down.. we'll see.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 06:34
by stujones
Interesting fight.... Normally, I would go for Napa everytime but I do have one or two worries.

1) Is he slowing up... I wasn't all that impressed with him vs Haskins. Took his time and I think could have done a better job when Haskins arm "went".

2) Has he fought too often this year... are we going to have enough James Hare/Kevin Anderson scenerio.

Prime Napa is better than prime Power IMO - question is though, is this a prime Napa.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 06:38
by Marc.C
observer1 wrote:Dont know who they are, so not going to Vote.

But Martin 'Power' sounds like has the edge with that name.
Your not much of an 'observer' then are you :D

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 06:43
by Captain Hook
HairyBoxe24 wrote::-? Why's everyone saying Napa has been looking good lately? Very confusing, he's been slowly getting worse through out his last 3 fights, and was getting spanked by Haskins till Haskins picked up the injury.

From where I'm sitting, Napa's got worse and Haskins 27 so he could surely of only got better.. unless getting stopped twice took something away from him, but don't kid yourself in to thinking Napa would of got anything else then KO'd by that Munyai guy.
Napa was calm against Haskins, who blew his wad in the first 2/3. Napa started getting the upper hand and outboxing him, hurting him a couple of times, then all of a sudden Haskins had an arm injury. What was the story behind that in the end?

PS Some of Haskins fans there on the night = bunch of wankers, started a fight at ringside then swore all over the place. Scum.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 08:03
by oliverfennell
stujones wrote:Interesting fight.... Normally, I would go for Napa everytime but I do have one or two worries.

1) Is he slowing up... I wasn't all that impressed with him vs Haskins. Took his time and I think could have done a better job when Haskins arm "went".

2) Has he fought too often this year... are we going to have enough James Hare/Kevin Anderson scenerio.

Prime Napa is better than prime Power IMO - question is though, is this a prime Napa.
I'm sure it isn't a prime Power anyway.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 08:30
by MPG
I'm off to ladbrokes to place a few bets on Martin Stopping Napa in the late rounds.
The odd's are great :

Round 8 :33/1
Round 9 :40/1
Round 10 :50/1
Round 11 :50/1
Round 12 :66/1

I see it going to points but ya never know.I know Powers up for this!!!

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 09:24
by Captain Hook
Waste of money, he'll have his head boxed off. He might win 4/5 rounds, and that's it...

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 09:33
by HairyBoxe24
For those who are confident on Napa can you go take all the money laid on him at http://www.betfair.com

So someone we accept the odds I want on Power, cheers :TU:

Even better, accept my request of 1.98, so we can have a bet of our own :D

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 10:12
by stujones
oliverfennell wrote:
stujones wrote:Interesting fight.... Normally, I would go for Napa everytime but I do have one or two worries.

1) Is he slowing up... I wasn't all that impressed with him vs Haskins. Took his time and I think could have done a better job when Haskins arm "went".

2) Has he fought too often this year... are we going to have enough James Hare/Kevin Anderson scenerio.

Prime Napa is better than prime Power IMO - question is though, is this a prime Napa.
I'm sure it isn't a prime Power anyway.
Yeah good point, haven't seen enough of Power recently to know how near his prime he is also. Maybe the break has done him some good.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 10:16
by stujones
Captain Hook wrote:
HairyBoxe24 wrote::-? Why's everyone saying Napa has been looking good lately? Very confusing, he's been slowly getting worse through out his last 3 fights, and was getting spanked by Haskins till Haskins picked up the injury.

From where I'm sitting, Napa's got worse and Haskins 27 so he could surely of only got better.. unless getting stopped twice took something away from him, but don't kid yourself in to thinking Napa would of got anything else then KO'd by that Munyai guy.
Napa was calm against Haskins, who blew his wad in the first 2/3. Napa started getting the upper hand and outboxing him, hurting him a couple of times, then all of a sudden Haskins had an arm injury. What was the story behind that in the end?

PS Some of Haskins fans there on the night = bunch of wankers, started a fight at ringside then swore all over the place. Scum.
What I didn't like about the performance though was the final round. Now, I don't know what was wrong with Haskins but he spent a few rounds feeling sorry for himself. Then when he goes out for the one more round (something Sanigar wanted more than him, although Chris later denies it) - Haskins started boxing one handed and could be argued he leveled the round.

Now, Haskins has stamina issues and a temporament issues - well documented. It could be argued though that the only rounds he lost were the rounds he felt sorry for himself.

Power won't feel sorry for himself at all.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 10:16
by stujones
Wales wrote:I actually dont care. Probably wont watch or record the bill, which is a bit sad isnt it.
Well you should tape it at least Wales, last time it was a FOTY canditate. You could be missing a treat.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 11:07
by johnswan1
MPG wrote:I'm off to ladbrokes to place a few bets on Martin Stopping Napa in the late rounds.
The odd's are great :

Round 8 :33/1
Round 9 :40/1
Round 10 :50/1
Round 11 :50/1
Round 12 :66/1

I see it going to points but ya never know.I know Powers up for this!!!
How do you know? I assume you are either a) Martin Power or b) a relative of his. I know there is at least another person like you on here who starts Martin Power threads and then disappears. I don't care either way but if you are Martin Power or are a relative of his, why not share any extra info you have with the rest of us.

Posted: 30 Nov 2007, 11:09
by Coco
Maybe MPG stands for Martin Power's Girlfriend!