Page 1 of 2
Just got my paper, Warren/Sheehan having a pop at Billy Grah
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 02:02
by STP
Both Frank and Pat are having a pop at Hatton's trainer, Graham.
It's uncalled for.
Hatton WAS hunting him down masterfully and cutting the gap fast, as Graham said he would be, but he just couldn't get his shots off quick enough or well enough on the night once he was there. I DO think he's looked abit cumbersome in both his welterweight title fights, but surely that's down to Kerry Kayes and not Billy Graham.
Graham looks after tactics and technique. Kayes does the muscle stuff/weight stuff.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 02:27
by jammidodger
frank's just pissed he didnt keep his finger in the pie...

Re: Just got my paper, Warren/Sheehan having a pop at Billy
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 06:03
by KO Artist
STP wrote:Both Frank and Pat are having a pop at Hatton's trainer, Graham.
It's uncalled for.
Hatton WAS hunting him down masterfully and cutting the gap fast, as Graham said he would be, but he just couldn't get his shots off quick enough or well enough on the night once he was there. I DO think he's looked abit cumbersome in both his welterweight title fights, but surely that's down to Kerry Kayes and not Billy Graham.
Graham looks after tactics and technique. Kayes does the muscle stuff/weight stuff.
I'm not sure how much influence these trainers have. From my observation Hatton got schooled.
Cutting the distance betweenyou and your opponent is all very well if you land a shot or slip a shot at the end of it.
Hatton was too one dimensional for Floyd
Graham cant give him a ramrod jab and crushing one punch ko power (which is what a fighter needs to beat Floyd)
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 07:08
by Damian
Hasn't there been a long history of emnity between Warren and Graham? Doesn't Hatton's dad also have a rocky relationship with him?
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 08:00
by Sammy Mendelson
Damian wrote:Hasn't there been a long history of emnity between Warren and Graham?
You're not wrong. As far as I am aware, Warren has always disliked Billy, and that's putting it lightly.
It annoys me somewhat when people look too hard for reasons why a sportsman may have lost. All too often the trainer is turned upon when it is not justified.
A good example of this was when Anthony Farnell left Brian Hughes. Hughes had moulded the limited talent of Farnell into something akin to a half decent fighter. Farnell was making a good living through sheer determination and the tutelage of Hughes. When he got caught cold by a beautiful shot from Takaloo and knocked out in a round, those around Farnell turned on Hughes and lay the blame at the veteran trainer's door. I personally think that was awful.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 08:16
by lowersmiths
from what i could hear, graham was telling hatton to stop attacking in straight lines because he was smothering his work - which was exactly the right advice.
the fact hatton wouldnt do it isnt graham's fault.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 09:14
by Dirk Kelly
Says in the Mirror that Hatton is reviewing the whole Mayweather fight and ditching Graham is an option since tension was running high in the camp, Graham didn't fly back with them yesterday.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 09:15
by Damian
Sammy Mendelson wrote:Damian wrote:Hasn't there been a long history of emnity between Warren and Graham?
You're not wrong. As far as I am aware, Warren has always disliked Billy, and that's putting it lightly.
It annoys me somewhat when people look too hard for reasons why a sportsman may have lost. All too often the trainer is turned upon when it is not justified.
A good example of this was when Anthony Farnell left Brian Hughes. Hughes had moulded the limited talent of Farnell into something akin to a half decent fighter. Farnell was making a good living through sheer determination and the tutelage of Hughes. When he got caught cold by a beautiful shot from Takaloo and knocked out in a round, those around Farnell turned on Hughes and lay the blame at the veteran trainer's door. I personally think that was awful.
I would like to see Hatton remain loyal to Graham for precisely these reasons.
Loyalty is too undervalued a commodity in boxing.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 09:23
by lowersmiths
Dirk Kelly wrote:Says in the Mirror that Hatton is reviewing the whole Mayweather fight and ditching Graham is an option since tension was running high in the camp, Graham didn't fly back with them yesterday.
hasnt graham got a house in the USA?
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 10:06
by Autobarn
Give Hatton a new trainer and FM Jr will knock him out quicker.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 11:03
by yiddo14
Fwanky gutted that Hatton became richer than him on the back of that fight, and Sheehan is a football jounalist who has never written anything worth reading about boxing.
Why does any newspaper insist on having a promoter as their weekly "specialist"?
Surely an ex-fighter or trainer(or both)would be a better option?
Afterall, you would'nt listen to a single word Karren Brady came out with when talking about football tactics, so why should Fwankys opinion carry any weight?
His "talent" is making money off the back of a boxers GENUINE talent.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 11:16
by Mario
I wonder how much warren is paying the sun for his weekly column? Britains best selling tabloid on a saturday is a fantastic place to advertise your upcoming shows and slate those your not making money off anymore.
I guess whatever else you say about him, he's a good businessman!
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 11:53
by rhino222
keep your eye on this situation, i smell trouble between hatton and graham and have suspected it for a long time !!
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 12:05
by Southpaw Stylist
Don't get me wrong, Graham was lucky to get someone like Hatton in the first place, but he is certainly NOT to blame for Hatton's performance.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 12:08
by Sammy Mendelson
rhino222 wrote:keep your eye on this situation, i smell trouble between hatton and graham and have suspected it for a long time !!
I hope you're wrong. The Hamedification of Hatton is a metamorphosis I do not wish to see.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 13:39
by Chambers2
yiddo14 wrote:
Why does any newspaper insist on having a promoter as their weekly "specialist"?
Surely an ex-fighter or trainer(or both)would be a better option?
spot on
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 14:53
by Poncey
Sammy Mendelson wrote:rhino222 wrote:keep your eye on this situation, i smell trouble between hatton and graham and have suspected it for a long time !!
I hope you're wrong. The Hamedification of Hatton is a metamorphosis I do not wish to see.
Not sure if it was apparent on the PPV, but I was behind Hatton's corner for the fight and there was something just not rightbetween Hatton and Graham I thought at the time.
Graham was also having a row with HBO as they made their were getting ready.
Could've just been nerves and they were blocking his corner, but I'd never seen him like that before.
Also thought it odd on 24/7 that they weren't really shown together outside the ring when being interviewed, especially given their past together.
Might just be reading into nowt
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 15:03
by jamesmcdonnell
lowersmiths wrote:Dirk Kelly wrote:Says in the Mirror that Hatton is reviewing the whole Mayweather fight and ditching Graham is an option since tension was running high in the camp, Graham didn't fly back with them yesterday.
hasnt graham got a house in the USA?
He does yes.
I hope Hatton doesn't ditch Graham, fighters do sometimes react in this fashion after a big loss, but it rarely works to their advantage from what I can see.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 15:11
by hitman_hatton1
jamesmcdonnell wrote:lowersmiths wrote:Dirk Kelly wrote:Says in the Mirror that Hatton is reviewing the whole Mayweather fight and ditching Graham is an option since tension was running high in the camp, Graham didn't fly back with them yesterday.
hasnt graham got a house in the USA?
He does yes.
I hope Hatton doesn't ditch Graham, fighters do sometimes react in this fashion after a big loss, but it rarely works to their advantage from what I can see.
load of pie in the sky.
hatton and graham will stay together.
it was obvious warren was gonna slag hatton big style.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 15:16
by chesh
jamesmcdonnell wrote:lowersmiths wrote:Dirk Kelly wrote:Says in the Mirror that Hatton is reviewing the whole Mayweather fight and ditching Graham is an option since tension was running high in the camp, Graham didn't fly back with them yesterday.
hasnt graham got a house in the USA?
He does yes.
I hope Hatton doesn't ditch Graham, fighters do sometimes react in this fashion after a big loss, but it rarely works to their advantage from what I can see.
You can't teach an old dog new tricks and Hatton, in the twilight of his career after 44 fights, is unlikely to learn any. I agree with Ian McNeilly's report on BBN that Ricky was pretty much gassed from round 3/4. I'm no expert on training techniques, but maybe there was too much emphasis on strength rather than cardio training. Hatton's shown no evidence that he still has great stamina since the Tszyu fight.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 15:55
by observer1
When will you fools learn to not trust Tabloids...
Their BS..
Time will tell..
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 15:59
by steve689
Frank's column is just an outlet for spouting bile and slagging off rival boxers/promoters. They should certainly draft in a neutral writer for analysis and opinion instead of a one sided propoganda machine.
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 16:29
by jamesmcdonnell
News of the World as Sponsors for Sports Network as I recall, isn't their logo plastered on the boards at ringside, and in the ring as well?
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 19:35
by STP
yiddo14 wrote:Fwanky gutted that Hatton became richer than him on the back of that fight, and Sheehan is a football jounalist who has never written anything worth reading about boxing.
Why does any newspaper insist on having a promoter as their weekly "specialist"?
Surely an ex-fighter or trainer(or both)would be a better option?
Afterall, you would'nt listen to a single word Karren Brady came out with when talking about football tactics, so why should Fwankys opinion carry any weight?
His "talent" is making money off the back of a boxers GENUINE talent.
It's who you know...
Posted: 15 Dec 2007, 19:38
by STP
Frank became friendly with the sports editor of the News of the World, who moved to The Sun in the summer.