Page 1 of 2

Mundine to defend against Hamdan - Feb 27

Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 09:44
by AntonS

Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 13:35
by bollox
Oh dear :roll: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:

Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 14:16
by Spreadking
LOL

go Mundine, go

Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 16:47
by Grant
6 years to late I'm afraid

Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 18:22
by Joe Corona
LMAO. hardly suprising.

The WBA just let this bloke do whatever he wants.

Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 19:20
by razor7
Surely the WBA have some rule about fighting mandatory challengers. Mundine will go from Clavero to Hamden ie voluntary/voluntary. How can this be. As for the fight itself- tell me it isn't so. :x

Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 19:47
by Ross
Hamdan is way past it and Mundine knows it, do what I do when Mundine fights an undeserving fighter - ignore it.
Unfortunately this hurts Hamdan a figter that I like, but he will get paid

Ross

Posted: 19 Dec 2007, 21:08
by Beltane
Totally agree Ross.

Nadar has been heading downhill ever since he was easily outpointed by Sam Soliman.

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 00:53
by Brute
Sounds like a typical Mundine fight. :-?

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 01:00
by jaafar
I know both these fighters personally....didn't want to see it happening! :evil: :evil: :box:

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 01:13
by Brute
Maybe Mundine wants Hamden to have a big payday before he retires.

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 01:51
by jaafar
Brute wrote:Maybe Mundine wants Hamden to have a big payday before he retires.
That's exactly right! Mundine even said that in the press conference today....

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 02:16
by Sweet P
Worst matchup ive seen in a long time, Mundine chickened out years ago when Hamden was in his prime and now he wants to fight him when Hamden isnt even a top 100 fighter.

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 03:18
by jaafar
ben k wrote:Worst matchup ive seen in a long time, Mundine chickened out years ago when Hamden was in his prime and now he wants to fight him when Hamden isnt even a top 100 fighter.
:oops: :lol:

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 04:03
by Joe Corona
ben k wrote:Worst matchup ive seen in a long time, Mundine chickened out years ago when Hamden was in his prime and now he wants to fight him when Hamden isnt even a top 100 fighter.
Yes, its a horrible match up but comments like that deserve a :roll:

Look for Green to pull a banana out of somewhere and fight not long after, setting up the inevitable rematch which IMO isnt required at all and is just a money grab by both.

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 04:20
by Marlin
Does Mundine really thinking he is fooling anyone with this fight?

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 17:17
by Brute
In hamdan's last fight Mads Larsen beat him. Wouldn't Mundine/Larsen be a fairer matchup? Or Kessler (who has beaten Choc)? Or Lacy?

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 19:22
by Marlin
Brute wrote:In hamdan's last fight Mads Larsen beat him. Wouldn't Mundine/Larsen be a fairer matchup? Or Kessler (who has beaten Choc)? Or Lacy?
Nah they might test Mundine, he wouldn't want that...

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 20:12
by Joe Corona
Yes, there are obviously much better matchups out there, but the problem is unfortunately choc can make enough $$$ fighting easy fights so the incentive to fight better calibre simply isnt there.

The need to improve through better opposition obviously doenst drive the Mundines at all.

So, the problem comes back to us, the paying public. Anyone who buys these horrible shows can only blame themselves.

I can sleep at night knowing I havnt paid for a Mundine fight in a long time, but Im obviously the minority of boxing fans.

And the same goes for Green when he no doubt pulls out a bananarama for his next fight.

Posted: 20 Dec 2007, 20:23
by Marlin
I have never paid for a Mundine fight... apart from Green Mundine, but that was a Green fight in my book not a Mundine fight...

Posted: 21 Dec 2007, 04:05
by Sweet P
Joe Corona wrote:
ben k wrote:Worst matchup ive seen in a long time, Mundine chickened out years ago when Hamden was in his prime and now he wants to fight him when Hamden isnt even a top 100 fighter.
Yes, its a horrible match up but comments like that deserve a :roll:

Look for Green to pull a banana out of somewhere and fight not long after, setting up the inevitable rematch which IMO isnt required at all and is just a money grab by both.
Whats wrong with the comments, Mundine met Hamden and another Fenech fighter years ago in a press confrenence and said he wouldnt fight his Muslim Brother. Hamden was undeafeted at the time and at his peak.

Posted: 21 Dec 2007, 04:24
by Trent
I'd prefer to see mundine fight Sakio Bika, better challenge than hamden, even though i still think Mundine would win easily.

Posted: 21 Dec 2007, 04:30
by Collins2000
Trent wrote:I'd prefer to see mundine fight Sakio Bika, better challenge than hamden, even though i still think Mundine would win easily.
At this point in time Bika would be 10 times the threat Hamden is. So he won't be fighting Mundine.

I saw Hamdan lose every round in a totally uncompetitive 8 rounder with the average Mads Larsen. That's the sort of form the Mundines like when they are picking an opponent to defend against.

I think Mundine is a very good fighter but these kinds of matches are a joke.

Posted: 21 Dec 2007, 04:44
by bollox
By god this makes me think of Ray Robinson giving a way past it and in need of money Kid Gavilan, a decent payday before he retired. Anthony Mundine = Ray Robinson

Posted: 21 Dec 2007, 15:49
by Autobarn
Disappointing. For a man with all that ability he is a bit shameless. Time Mundine took a gamble. Looking back, with his style and speed, he should've beaten Kessler, instead of languishing on those ropes and giving most of the rounds away.

Mundine seems to have improved a lot since Kessler, so it makes it even more wretched. But I suppose it's good easy work from his POV.