Page 1 of 2

RICHARD WILLIAMS AWOL?

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 08:38
by overhand_right
Williams looked a reet old handful against the old boy Eastman december 06.

12 month layoff? Is he coming back? Injured? Turns 37 in may so knocking on a bit.

A fight with Wayne Elcock for the British & Commonwealth belts would be a nice scrap. Anyone know Richard?

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 08:53
by bridportboxer
Was going to ask / say the same thing about Glenn Catley, came back had a couple wins, almost fought Reid, then nothing happened. Anyone know if he is still pursuing his comeback?
Another former champ Froch could fight, though I suspect a fit Catley would give him more than a shot Reid.

Re: RICHARD WILLIAMS AWOL?

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 09:11
by Chambers2
overhand_right wrote:Williams looked a reet old handful against the old boy Eastman december 06.

12 month layoff? Is he coming back? Injured? Turns 37 in may so knocking on a bit.

A fight with Wayne Elcock for the British & Commonwealth belts would be a nice scrap. Anyone know Richard?
DG knows Richard, he might be able to shed some light on what hes doing

Re: RICHARD WILLIAMS AWOL?

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 09:32
by Podmore_Birmingham
overhand_right wrote:A fight with Wayne Elcock for the British & Commonwealth belts would be a nice scrap. Anyone know Richard?
For the record, Wayne is only the British champion, as Howard didn't put it on the line and then was stripped. As you will probably know, Darren Barker is the Commonwealth belt holder.

Wayne will be making a voluntary defence of his Lonsdale belt in March.

Re: RICHARD WILLIAMS AWOL?

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 09:48
by oliverfennell
Podmore_Birmingham wrote:
overhand_right wrote:A fight with Wayne Elcock for the British & Commonwealth belts would be a nice scrap. Anyone know Richard?
For the record, Wayne is only the British champion, as Howard didn't put it on the line and then was stripped. As you will probably know, Darren Barker is the Commonwealth belt holder.

Wayne will be making a voluntary defence of his Lonsdale belt in March.
vs McDermott? :TU:

Re: RICHARD WILLIAMS AWOL?

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 09:55
by Podmore_Birmingham
oliverfennell wrote:
Podmore_Birmingham wrote:
overhand_right wrote:A fight with Wayne Elcock for the British & Commonwealth belts would be a nice scrap. Anyone know Richard?
For the record, Wayne is only the British champion, as Howard didn't put it on the line and then was stripped. As you will probably know, Darren Barker is the Commonwealth belt holder.

Wayne will be making a voluntary defence of his Lonsdale belt in March.
vs McDermott? :TU:
Sadly not, no. Macca is having an eight-rounder in Wolverhampton on February 28. He is, however, expecting to be made mandatory for the title soon.

Wayne has told me one or two names that are in the melting pot, but will have to wait and see.

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 10:13
by Old bones Ian
Oliver did you really think that Williams looked good against Eastman?
I thought he looked like an old fighter after 6 rounds, think Richard should call it a day.

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 10:35
by overhand_right
My names not Oliver but yes i was in the flesh and Williams in person was built like a tank. Really did not come across so much on TV when i watched same fight on DVD.

He was strong & was giving it a go til the 12th when he got clocked.

Where does he/did he train?

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 10:51
by Old bones Ian
Sorry Overhand got you mixed up.
I just don't think that Williams has got much left to beat the top middles in the country, so where does that leave him. I don't want to see him being a target for up and comers

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 10:54
by oliverfennell
Old bones Ian wrote:Sorry Overhand got you mixed up.
I just don't think that Williams has got much left to beat the top middles in the country, so where does that leave him. I don't want to see him being a target for up and comers
Agree. "The Secret" was one of my favourites but there's little point in him coming back now. Chances are he could beat Elcock, but he's already won the British, so what's the point? He was always aiming for world titles, gave it a good shot, came up short. No shame in that, but if he hasn't made it by 37, he's not going to.

Re: RICHARD WILLIAMS AWOL?

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 17:09
by DG.
overhand_right wrote:Williams looked a reet old handful against the old boy Eastman december 06.

12 month layoff? Is he coming back? Injured? Turns 37 in may so knocking on a bit.

A fight with Wayne Elcock for the British & Commonwealth belts would be a nice scrap. Anyone know Richard?
I will drop him a line later this week and see what he is up to.

He could still beat Elcock!




:TU:

Posted: 09 Jan 2008, 17:15
by Twinkle Toes
Doubt it

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 07:05
by overhand_right
Fill us in on the details whatever Richard tells you DG

:box:

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 08:06
by ciscokid
Williams would have a chance against any middleweight in the UK.

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 11:03
by DG.
overhand_right wrote:Fill us in on the details whatever Richard tells you DG

:box:
Will do!

Would be good for him to come back, but I would magine it would only be for titles.

Come on Elcock - make a voluntary!


:TU:

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 11:20
by DG.
Terry D wrote:I watched the 1st Samuels fight the other night. Was shaping up to be one for the ages until the cuts stopped it.

Williams oozed quality for most of his career, in that sense, despite the bad luck, his career has been a major let-down.

Hope he does fight Elcock though :box:
He was capable of achieving more than he has. :TU:

IBO - Commonwealth belts are mor than most ahcieve - but imo - he would have been better off with Fwanky Wankerren in terms of making mor emoney etc. Having said that, look at the crap job Fwank did with Wayne Alexander.

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 11:52
by Old bones Ian
Martinez who beat Williams twice, now there's a waste of a career.
He's 32 now, and still no nearer a title shot.

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 12:14
by oliverfennell
Terry D wrote:Would like to interview Richard if he is ever in these parts.
Have you ever seen The Truman Show?

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 12:16
by oliverfennell
Old bones Ian wrote:Martinez who beat Williams twice, now there's a waste of a career.
He's 32 now, and still no nearer a title shot.
I believe he won a WBC eliminator, so hopefully he'll get his shot and is just treading water while he waits. He probably didn't make the best decision in basing himself in Spain; hardly a boxing hotbed.

When Williams beat Shannan Taylor, I thought he looked a world beater.

I guess he just turned pro too late. If he was 32 rather than 37 now, he might yet have made it.

On a side note, he's probably the friendliest and most approachable boxer I've ever met on the circuit. Well, him or Francis Ampofo.

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 12:29
by Podmore_Birmingham
DG. wrote:Come on Elcock - make a voluntary! :TU:
You know Wayne would do a number on him, DG :TU:

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 12:33
by Old bones Ian
oliverfennell wrote:
Old bones Ian wrote:Martinez who beat Williams twice, now there's a waste of a career.
He's 32 now, and still no nearer a title shot.
I believe he won a WBC eliminator, so hopefully he'll get his shot and is just treading water while he waits. He probably didn't make the best decision in basing himself in Spain; hardly a boxing hotbed.

When Williams beat Shannan Taylor, I thought he looked a world beater.

I guess he just turned pro too late. If he was 32 rather than 37 now, he might yet have made it.

On a side note, he's probably the friendliest and most approachable boxer I've ever met on the circuit. Well, him or Francis Ampofo.
Strange to think that out of Martinez, Williams and Shannon Taylor

Its Taylor that got the shot at a world title first.
You'd have said Taylor was finished after the Williams fight.

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 12:56
by Chambers2
Old bones Ian wrote:Martinez who beat Williams twice, now there's a waste of a career.
He's 32 now, and still no nearer a title shot.
Hes an awesome boxer, its a travesty hes not had more opportunities, but who's going to want to fight him by choice.

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 13:23
by oliverfennell
Terry D wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:
Terry D wrote:Would like to interview Richard if he is ever in these parts.
Have you ever seen The Truman Show?
Are you saying that he is a pawn in a bigger game whose career was overseen by an evil genius who constantly wanted to keep him down and bent the laws of reality to do so? Jesus, it is worse than I thought.

We can all make excuses but that one is a doozy!
I'm sure you know what I'm getting at, Mr Fogg :TU:

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 13:45
by DG.
Podmore_Birmingham wrote:
DG. wrote:Come on Elcock - make a voluntary! :TU:
You know Wayne would do a number on him, DG :TU:

No way!

RW knocks him out in 5!

:D

Posted: 10 Jan 2008, 13:48
by oliverfennell
Terry D wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:
Terry D wrote: Are you saying that he is a pawn in a bigger game whose career was overseen by an evil genius who constantly wanted to keep him down and bent the laws of reality to do so? Jesus, it is worse than I thought.

We can all make excuses but that one is a doozy!
I'm sure you know what I'm getting at, Mr Fogg :TU:
'Around the World in 80 Days', or the modern version 'How I picked up a whole new culture in one afternoon whilst paddling in a Vietnamese Vagina, then went home and got my braids sorted, seen?' :TU:
Not sure where you get these ideas about my travels, Terry...

But let's just say you wanted to interview a boxer outside Manchester. How would you go about it? Tough one...