Mitchell/Small Setanta gripe
Posted: 16 Jan 2008, 21:46
So I went away for a long weekend, the recorder bolloxed up my live taping of Saturday's fights, but I figured I still had the replay to lokk forward to, even if it was only an hour.
Now, Mitchell-Torres was a main event in name only. And, considering it only lasted three rounds, surely Setanta could squeeze in the REAL main event i.e. what knowledgeable fight fans were most looking forward to - Small v Takaloo?
But no, we get Kevin's brother v Robin Deakin in a four-rounder, plus some Bunce-in-a-pie-shop guff and full ring entrances, introductions, studio chit-chat and interviews.
Come on.
As good as Vinnie-Deakin was, I wouldn't have torn my hair out if I'd missed it. But I damn near did at missing Small v Takaloo. Did we need that pie shop segment, which told us virtually nothing? More importantly, did we need full ring walks, studio stuff, introductions and interviews?
If they'd dropped all that filler and Vinnie-Deakin, Setanta could have fit in Small-Takaloo no problem.
Thoughts? Or was I the only poor sod to miss the live broadcast?
Now, Mitchell-Torres was a main event in name only. And, considering it only lasted three rounds, surely Setanta could squeeze in the REAL main event i.e. what knowledgeable fight fans were most looking forward to - Small v Takaloo?
But no, we get Kevin's brother v Robin Deakin in a four-rounder, plus some Bunce-in-a-pie-shop guff and full ring entrances, introductions, studio chit-chat and interviews.
Come on.
As good as Vinnie-Deakin was, I wouldn't have torn my hair out if I'd missed it. But I damn near did at missing Small v Takaloo. Did we need that pie shop segment, which told us virtually nothing? More importantly, did we need full ring walks, studio stuff, introductions and interviews?
If they'd dropped all that filler and Vinnie-Deakin, Setanta could have fit in Small-Takaloo no problem.
Thoughts? Or was I the only poor sod to miss the live broadcast?