Page 1 of 1
does anyone know how much skelton
Posted: 16 Jan 2008, 23:37
by boxerbob
is making from his fight on sat night???
for fighting for the heavyweight title i think he should be on between 250k to 500k
Re: does anyone know how much skelton
Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 04:36
by Poncey
boxerbob wrote:is making from his fight on sat night???
for fighting for the heavyweight title i think he should be on between 250k to 500k
He should be so lucky! Remember, this is in Germany, not Vegas, and isn't on PPV.
Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 05:39
by TerribleTerry
I would be surprised if he was getting much in excess of 100,000 to be honest.
Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 07:21
by Old bones Ian
TerribleTerry wrote:I would be surprised if he was getting much in excess of 100,000 to be honest.
I'd think it would be around that mark, i remember that Warren turned down a previous shot at Maskaev because they offered only £50,000 to Skelton.
Its a calculated risk on Saturday for Skelton, smaller end of the pay scale for this fight, but win and he's going to earn big.
Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 07:39
by bigped
when a boxer gets paid 100 grand?? do they lose 40 per tax?? and ten per cent to manager? and ten per to trainer??
Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 07:49
by n1ebf
it's a paltry offer 50k.
he's making up HALF of the fight, they shouldn't take these liberties just cos he's new to that level of boxing.
if they offered me that I'd tell them to beat it. Sod the title. It's disrespectful. Full stop.
Good look Skelts, give it some son!!!!!!
Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 08:00
by Poncey
bigped wrote:when a boxer gets paid 100 grand?? do they lose 40 per tax?? and ten per cent to manager? and ten per to trainer??
Depends, there's ways around HRT. I already do it using an offshore trust. Fck Gordon Brown!
Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 08:54
by chesh
bigped wrote:when a boxer gets paid 100 grand?? do they lose 40 per tax?? and ten per cent to manager? and ten per to trainer??
The overheads - manager's and trainer's cuts, training and other expenses - would, I assume, come off the top. Just say, for example, that amounted to 40k, then Skelton's taxable earnings would be 60k which, after tax at 40%, would leave him with 36k in his pocket. There would obviously be many legal ways - such as payments into pension funds etc. - to reduce the liability. I'm not an accountant, by the way. I've just spent many hours in the company of accountants, having run my own business for many years.
Posted: 17 Jan 2008, 09:44
by overhand_right
Going abroad to box the locals in Germany is supposed to be a lucrative business isn't it?