Page 1 of 1

BRITISH TITLE ELIABILITY

Posted: 18 Jan 2008, 01:11
by p4p1
just a question about the britich title... if a bloke was born in australia and has lived in aust his whole life but his mother and grandparent were all born and lived in blackpool is he eligable to fight for a british title?

Re: BRITISH TITLE ELIABILITY

Posted: 18 Jan 2008, 10:07
by DG.
p4p1 wrote:just a question about the britich title... if a bloke was born in australia and has lived in aust his whole life but his mother and grandparent were all born and lived in blackpool is he eligable to fight for a british title?
Depends if his cousins sister ate chicken and if she got it from Tesco.


:TU:

Posted: 18 Jan 2008, 10:39
by Old bones Ian
if he held a British passport that would be enough,

Re: BRITISH TITLE ELIABILITY

Posted: 18 Jan 2008, 11:07
by Chambers2
p4p1 wrote:just a question about the britich title... if a bloke was born in australia and has lived in aust his whole life but his mother and grandparent were all born and lived in blackpool is he eligable to fight for a british title?
If its good enough for the Welsh Rugby team......

Posted: 18 Jan 2008, 11:54
by jonp
You got to be able to spell british to be eligible. :o

Posted: 19 Jan 2008, 09:36
by p4p1
jonp wrote:You got to be able to spell british to be eligible. :o
lol

Posted: 21 Jan 2008, 14:06
by 1southpaw
i think all you have to do is become a british citicen and be based hear then you can fight for the title :box:

Posted: 22 Jan 2008, 12:17
by oliverfennell
There's some minimum period of residency if you don't have citizenship. I believe it's 10 years. Rule applied to Herbie Hide (Nigerian) and Takaloo (Iranian).

Posted: 22 Jan 2008, 12:44
by stujones
Any ideas if Bami is eligable?

Posted: 22 Jan 2008, 12:51
by oliverfennell
Check the Boxing News rankings; I think they put an asterism next to British-BASED fighters who are not yet officially British.