Page 1 of 1
WBC. Title
Posted: 01 Feb 2008, 16:37
by DG.
Here we go again!
Hatton bashing!
I rate Witters WBC Title wining effort and defences ABOVE Hattons 727 WBU Titles defences.
What do you think?
Do the History Books even mention the WBU?
Posted: 01 Feb 2008, 16:48
by Dioufy
No, but the history books remember a former WBA welterweight world champion and a former IBF, WBA, IBO light welterweight world champion.
Posted: 01 Feb 2008, 16:57
by Matt W
And the point of this thread is......???????
Posted: 01 Feb 2008, 17:20
by Poncey
Dioufy wrote:No, but the history books remember a former WBA welterweight world champion and a former IBF, WBA, IBO light welterweight world champion.
2 time IBF baby, 2 time.
Posted: 01 Feb 2008, 17:25
by DG.
Dioufy wrote:No, but the history books remember a former WBA welterweight world champion and a former IBF, WBA, IBO light welterweight world champion.
The same as your post.
Posted: 01 Feb 2008, 17:26
by Dioufy
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Dioufy wrote:No, but the history books remember a former WBA welterweight world champion and a former IBF, WBA, IBO light welterweight world champion.
2 time IBF baby, 2 time.
Ah, I remember now. I forget he vacated it to face Luis Collazo and then re-won it by beating Juan Urango.
Posted: 01 Feb 2008, 17:27
by DG.
Matt W wrote:And the point of this thread is......???????
The POINT is,
I think it is better to WIN a legit BELT and hold onto it instead of winning a belt VACATING and then going BACK for the belt to call yourself a time Champ etc etc!
Comprende?
Posted: 02 Feb 2008, 12:59
by Matt W
Yes, I understand that, but surely it's about who you beat and not what gaudy belt you have around your waist?
Posted: 02 Feb 2008, 13:11
by m1kee50
Matt W wrote:Yes, I understand that, but surely it's about who you beat and not what gaudy belt you have around your waist?
The 'Herol Graham' effect if I may
Posted: 02 Feb 2008, 13:23
by Max Molyneux
DG. wrote:Matt W wrote:And the point of this thread is......???????
The POINT is,
I think it is better to WIN a legit BELT and hold onto it instead of winning a belt VACATING and then going BACK for the belt to call yourself a time Champ etc etc!
Comprende?
It Is better Indeed.
I like when a champ becomes champ and cleans out the division too rather than just beating one guy thinking their the best.
Posted: 02 Feb 2008, 17:48
by DG.
Max Molyneux wrote:DG. wrote:Matt W wrote:And the point of this thread is......???????
The POINT is,
I think it is better to WIN a legit BELT and hold onto it instead of winning a belt VACATING and then going BACK for the belt to call yourself a time Champ etc etc!
Comprende?
It Is better Indeed.
I like when a champ becomes champ and cleans out the division too rather than just beating one guy thinking their the best.
Exactamundo!